tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6399730406480392183.post5208741327426891037..comments2024-03-27T11:18:34.222-03:00Comments on Viable Opposition: COVID-19 Vaccines - Real Risk Reduction vs. Absolute Risk ReductionA Political Junkiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03342345936277964422noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6399730406480392183.post-48953595958960864802021-06-07T17:00:51.448-03:002021-06-07T17:00:51.448-03:00You know what else would have saved lives? The us...You know what else would have saved lives? The use of ivermectin which has proven to be an effective treatment for those suffering from COVID-19. But, then again, Big Pharma wouldn't make enough money to keep themselves in the lifestyle to which they've become accustomed, would they?A Political Junkiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03342345936277964422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6399730406480392183.post-62012322831200464742021-05-20T08:14:50.487-03:002021-05-20T08:14:50.487-03:00Early on the argument was that IFR was even lower ...Early on the argument was that IFR was even lower than CFR and low to start with anyways. <br />Result in the US: 600k deaths (!)<br />Vaccines do work and are safe (both at the individual and population levels) and, if available in early 2020, would have effectively protected the various at-risk groups (to the tune of 90% at least). Result: 600k - 90% of 600k<br />Absolute risk is another valuable perspective but using it to convey dogmatic messages is not helpful.Carlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01792779708580094262noreply@blogger.com