The
IMF recently released its latest prognostication for Asia's economy and things
are not particularly looking great. The world's economic engine is
looking like it might be starting to show evidence of "Euro
Influenza" as the impact of Eurozone debt and banking issues spill over
into Asia. Here's a brief summary of what the IMF predicts in its Regional Economic Outlook for Asia and
the Pacific.
I'll also post a bit of information from the Outlook showing how big
China's impact is on the world's economy and how a slowdown there would impact
its neighbours and the rest of the world.
The
IMF opens by noting that the world economic recovery is much more sluggish than
it appeared to be back in the spring of 2011, particularly because of the
eruption of Eurozone financial turbulence. Economic growth from advanced
economies is weak and is unlikely to improve; this will most likely lead to
decreasing external demand for goods produced in the Asia-Pacific region. Despite
the drop in external demand, internal demand is expected to remain robust which
will lead to both an increase in both credit and inflation in the area. Internal
demand has been resilient largely because of increased employment and gains in
real wages, the complete opposite to what is being experienced in Europe and
the United States. In the Asia-Pacific, the conflict between a potential
economic slowdown because of dropping exports and an increase in inflation as a
result of high domestic demand means that Asian central bankers are walking a
very fine line between over-tightening and not tightening enough. Here is
a look at the year-over-year change in inflation rates since January 2011 for
selected Asian countries:
On a
year-over-year basis, inflation increased from 4.6 percent in January to 5.5
percent throughout the entire region due to both increases in commodity prices
and the pressures of increased demand for goods. Inflation remains above
central bank targets in Vietnam, Korea, Hong Kong and China. Contrary to
this, Japan is still mired in deflation with negative core inflation when food
and fuel are excluded. Here's a rather cool graph showing which countries
are within their inflation targets by month with the red months showing that
inflationary pressures are above target and rising and which are not:
The
IMF has changed its growth forecast for the region since its last report in
April. Growth for 2011 is expected to be 6.5 percent (down 0.5 percent
from their previous prognostication) and for 2012 is expected to be 6.75
percent (down 0.25 percent). Growth levels of this magnitude would be
positively amazing for the world's advanced economies where many nations are on
the cusp of seeing economic contraction. The drop in economic growth in
the Asia-Pacific region is almost exclusively related to a drop in exports to
the world's advanced economies where the IMF's economic forecast shows
declining growth levels. Here is a chart showing the IMF's latest Asian
growth projections by country:
Taking
a closer look at the economic giants of the area we note that China is still
expecting growth of 9.0 percent in 2012, Taiwan is expecting 5.0 percent ,
Korea is expecting 4.4 percent and India is expecting 7.5 percent growth. On
the downside, Japan is expecting growth of only 2.3 percent following a
contraction of 0.5 percent this year and Australia is expecting growth of only
3.3 percent following 1.8 percent growth this year. With this economic
dichotomy, if Asia's central banks raise interest rates too much, they risk
either pushing their weaker local economies into a slowdown or increasing the
value of their local currency which will make their exports even more expensive
to consuming nations. Oh what a tangled web!
Despite
the very high growth levels in many Asian nations, their stock markets have not
been immune from the "Eurozone Influenza" which struck with a
vengeance during the summer. Here is a look at how three of the Asian
markets responded to the multi-country debt debacle:
1.)
Nikkei 225 Index:
2.)
Shanghai Composite Index:
3.)
Hang Seng Index:
Stock
markets throughout the Asia-Pacific noted declines that paralleled those seen in
advanced nations in August and September. This demonstrates that there is
no safe place to hide from the "Eurozone Influenza" and from the
after-effects of the United States debt near-default. You may try to run, but you definitely cannot hide!
Now,
let's change gears and take a closer look the impact that China's economy has
on the rest of the world and on its neighbours.
Let's
start by looking at China's inflation. This graph shows you how volatile
consumer price inflation has been in China (blue line) over the past five years
when compared to the rest of Asia (green line):
Inflation
in China spills into the surrounding nations (and from there into the rest of
the world) with a one percentage point increase in China's inflation that is
related to supply and demand shock leading to a 0.25 percent increase in the
rest of the Asia-Pacific. Because China is the dominant importer of many of the
world's commodities, in particular metals, the impact of their demand on the
world's supply and price reaches far. Here's a graph showing how much of
the world's total imports of certain commodities are imported by China noting
that the country is not yet impacting the world's food supply and demand equation:
In
2009, China consumed 65 percent of the world's imports of iron ore and 53
percent of the world's soybeans, nearly doubling since 2000. China has
been the world's largest consumer of iron ore since 1992 and produces 47
percent of the world's steel. In total, China imports 29 percent of the
world's total imports of all metals and 13 percent of the world's imports of
all raw materials.
Looking
even further into the problem of China's growing demand for commodities, the
IMF calculates that a one percentage point increase in China's output may
raise commodity price inflation by about 5 percent! Now that's what I call an
economic powerhouse!
China's
ASEAN neighbours have been big suppliers of exports to China with commodities
including iron ore, petroleum and rubber which have replaced exports of
information technology. This increase in commodity exports is expected to
continue for the foreseeable future as China ramps up its construction of
social housing projects. Here is a graph showing how much exports to
China from its neighbours have grown over the past three years, in some cases
doubling in value:
Should
China's economy slow down in a meaningful way, the impact on its commodity-rich
neighbours would be widespread, leading to a slowdown in their economies.
With this information in mind, it is interesting to see the
issues facing the world's new economic powerhouse. With China reporting
its lowest economic expansion since 2009 for the third quarter of this year, a
deceleration in their economic growth pattern seems to be in place. While
growth is still a robust 9.1 percent, it is at its weakest level since the
second quarter of 2009 when it hit a low of 8.1 percent. While growth
levels of this magnitude are unheard of among OECD nations, the impact of
China's economy on the rest of the world cannot be denied, most particularly on
its Asian neighbours. Should China's economy continue to slow, the
"Asian Influenza 2011 Variant" could create further nightmares for
central bankers and other policy makers throughout the Eurozone and America who
are already struggling to keep their economies above water. Apparently we
really do have most of our eggs in a single basket. Three cheers for
globalization!
Will India ever get its act together enough to challenge China economically in any real sense?
ReplyDeleteOne has to wonder. Many of India's most successful corporations are closely held by insiders making it difficult for newcomers to enter the marketplace. Endemic corruption and a very poor infrastructure also complicates the issue for entrepreneurs wishing to expand into the country.
ReplyDeleteGiven a huge disproportion in population between China (1,400 mill.) and Russia (140 mill.) with its Siberian oil, gas, minerals, timber, etc., - will China gradually take over economic control over major areas of the underpopulated Siberian territory ? Will this trend lead to the eventual secession of parts of Siberia from the Russian Federation ?
ReplyDelete