Now that we're all aware of the State of the Union, I thought it would be interesting to see how another country views the issues facing America's fiscal future. As
consumers of information from the mainstream media, we tend to hear a lot about
sovereign debt ratings from the major ratings agencies; S&P, Moody's and
Fitch. Most non-financial people seem quite unaware of another ratings
agency by the name of Dagong Credit. I stumbled on this agency while
reading a summary of agency credit ratings for the United States and Dagong
stuck out like a sore thumb by giving the United States an "A"
rating, rather than the AAA or AA+ granted by most other agencies. Interestingly, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission refuses to recognize Dagong's debt ratings because the Commission cannot supervise the Beijing-based agency!
From their website, here is a brief summary outlining who Dagong is:
"Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. Ltd. (hereinafter
referred to as "Dagong") is a specialized credit rating and risk
analysis research institution founded in 1994 upon the joint approval of
People‘s Bank of China and the former State Economic & Trade Commission,
People’s Republic of China, and is also a key credit information and credit
solution service provider in China.
As the most influential founder of China‘s credit rating
industry and market, Dagong has all franchise qualifications granted by the
Chinese Government, and is an official institution providing credit rating
services for all bond issuers in China."
I was rather shocked to find out that the former Communist
Empire had a ratings agency. Dagong has over 500 employees, among them,
200 with Master's or Doctorate level education and 50 with post-Doctoral
education.
Now, let's see what Dagong has to say about the United States sovereign debt. Dagong's assessment
opens by noting that the United States Congress has, as of August 2, 2011,
approved the bill on raising the debt ceiling of the federal government. They
then note the following:
"Though
this decision enables the government to continue the practice of repaying its
old debt through raising new debt, it has not changed the general trend that
the increase in national debt outpaces the increase in economy and revenue,
making this incident a turning point for the US government’s solvency to
decline even further. Hence, Dagong decides to downgrade the local and
foreign currency credit rating of the US put on the negative watch list on July
14 from A+ to A with a negative outlook." (my bold)
If
you look back at Dagong's ratings system, you will see that the agency ranks
American debt at third from the top, denoting expectations of relatively
low default risk and vulnerability to adverse economic conditions.
I
find the comment that the practice of repaying the old debt by issuing new debt
most interesting, particularly, since I have observed (and posted) that
governments never, ever talk about actually repaying their debt obligations,
rather, as in the case of Congress, they make vague statements about cutting
the growth rate of the debt.
Here
are the four reasons for Dagong's downgrade:
1.) The
bipartisan struggle over the debt ceiling has exposed growing defects in the
United States government's ability to resolve the debt crisis. This means
that United States’ creditors lack any sort of a guarantee from both the
political and economic system of the country. The growing difference in
political views between the two Parties is preventing efficient
decision-making. Here's a quote from the assessment:
"...at
this crucial juncture, neither the Democratic Party nor Republican Party has
shown any consideration for the general interest in order to argue for their
own partisan interest; they had a hard time making the correct choice in a timely manner
leaving the world in terror, which highlights the negative role of the US
political system on an economic basis. This incident will definitely exert its
continuous impact on investors’ confidence in US Treasury bonds, affecting the
stability of the US debt income." (my bold)
I
couldn't have said it any better. Apparently the children of Congress
simply don't wish to share their toys or play well together, preferring to act
like an immature class of Grade One children (my apologies to Grade One
children everywhere).
2.)
By raising the debt limit, the U.S. staves off default, however, by increasing
the debt burden, the American debt crisis ultimately deepens further. The
solvency of the United States will continue to decline and "...the
accumulation of the contradiction between the lowering solvency and the rising
debt add to the inevitability of triggering a sovereign debt crisis".
3.)
The pace of the proposed United States' deficit cut is far lower that the
growth rate of new debt, largely as expenditure growth outstrips growth in
revenue. The deficit cut objective matches the size of the increase in
the debt, however, there is an eight year difference between the two
objectives. Dagong estimates that the United States will have to cut its
deficit by at least $4 trillion within the next 5 years to maintain the current
debt level, a highly unlikely occurrence in this divisive political environment.
4.)
The United States Congress has not come up with a substantive plan for growing
the domestic economy. This means that the Federal government cannot
resolve the influence of low growth, high deficit and higher debt through an
increase in wealth creation, making a decline in national solvency
irreversible. Dagong also notes that the implementation of another round
of easing (the Twist?) will throw the world economy into an overall crisis which
will shake the status of the United States dollar as a reserve currency.
Here's
Dagong's summary:
"The
radical deterioration in the state management capability, economic strength and
fiscal strength that affect the government debt service capability and
willingness revealed in the struggle over the debt ceiling determines the
outlook of the sovereign credit rating of the US as negative."
I
found this a rather profound and interesting summary of the issues facing the
United States. China has a great deal to lose in this process; with $3.18
trillion in foreign reserves including $1.13 trillion worth of United States
Treasuries, they have a vested interest in assuring that the United States
dollar remains the world's choice for a reserve currency as shown here:
At
least until China has a viable alternative in place as shown in this Wikileaks document where China suggests that as countries around the world increase their gold reserves, the importance of the renminbi will increase at the expense of the United States dollar.
Hey Buddy
ReplyDeleteI noticed you no longer had my website on your "recommended sites" list anymore.
My site thecomingdepression.net still has yours on our homepage.
Please consider re-adding us.
Thanks
Sorry, I accidentally deleted the widget for my recommended sites. I'll try to get it back ASAP.
ReplyDeleteThanks and my apologies.
CD
ReplyDeleteConsider it done!
"Neither the Democratic Party nor Republican Party has shown any consideration for the general interest in order to argue for their own partisan interest; they had a hard time making the correct choice in a timely manner leaving the world in terror, which highlights the negative role of the US political system on an economic basis."
ReplyDeleteAmen. As I have watched the GOP go through the exercise of selecting a worthy candidate to square off against Obama, I am very much reminded that there is a segment of the U.S. population and the U.S. political system (right wing religious fundamentalist Conservatives) who seem to be so divorced from reality I honestly wonder if there has been a systemic and wide-spread problem of oxygen deprivation at birth in American hospitals for the past hundred years. Many, a lot, a die-hard few are convinced beyond reasonableness of America's invincibility without realising that even the gods can fall from grace. If the British ruled the 19th century, the Americans ruled the 20th century. However the U.S. is headed beyond a doubt to their own chapter in the history books with the next chapter shaping up to be written in Mandarin. I have been amused to see Chinese-like pictogrammes displayed quite prominently in science fiction films like The Matrix, Blade Runner and Johnny Mnemonic. It is a telling sign than others, not of the mainstream establishment (political, academic or religious), see something on the horizon while the GOP remain oxygen deprived.
"I was rather shocked to find out that the former Communist Empire had a ratings agency."
ReplyDeleteCountries which are lenders need credit rating agencies to rate their customers. The US has credit rating agencies because in the past (1920-1970) it was a net lender. The US assessing it's own debt is a relic from days gone by.
Right now China is doing the lending, and the US is doing the borrowing, so it stands to reason it's China which should assess the US, and not the other way round.