A recent survey of Americans by the Pew Research
Centre asked whether voters thought that the press had been fair to the
presidential candidates. With growing political polarization in the
United States, this is a rather interesting and timely topic.
As
background, the total sample included 1005 individuals, 249 who identified themselves as Republicans, 336 who identified themselves as Democrats and 355 who identified themselves as
Independents. A combination of landline and cell randomly dialled samples
were used and the total survey is considered accurate to within plus or minus
3.7 percentage points.
Nearly half
of those surveyed (46 percent) stated that they felt that the coverage of Mitt
Romney has been fair. As well, the same percentage stated that they felt
that the coverage of President Obama has been fair. The difference lies
among those who feel that the press is biased; 20 percent feel that the press
has been too easy on Romney and 21 percent feel that the press has been too
tough on him. In contrast, nearly 28 percent of those surveyed felt that
the press coverage of President Obama has been too easy compared to only 15
percent who felt that coverage had been too tough.
If we look
back at the 2008 election, 23 percent of all voters surveyed thought that the
press was too tough on John McCain compared to only 15 percent who thought that
the press was being too easy. In 2008, only 7 percent of all voters
surveyed thought that the press was too tough on candidate Obama and 31 percent
thought that the press was too easy.
Here is a
chart showing a summary of the data for both election cycles:
Those who
identified themselves as Republican tended to be more critical of press
coverage than their Democratic counterparts; 45 percent of Republicans think
that the press has been too tough on Mitt Romney (think about the recent video
release!). This is about the same level as during the 2008 election when
44 percent of Republicans thought that the press was biased against John
McCain. In sharp contrast, only 26 percent of Democrats think that the
press has been too hard on Obama; that said, this is up markedly from the 2008 election
when only 9 percent of Democrats thought that the press was biased against
candidate Obama.
Even more
interesting is the number of Republicans that feel that Obama is getting a
"pass" by the press. A hefty 60 percent of Republicans feel
that coverage of Obama is "too easy", again, sharply contrasting the
29 percent of Democrats that feel that the press has been biased in favour of
Mitt Romney.
The results
of this polling give us an intriguing look at how American voters view media
bias, particularly as it pertains to the candidate of their choosing. It
should not be terribly surprising that at least some of America's most
influential media outlets are up front about their political leanings, an issue
that is particularly noticeable now that "journalists" have 24 hour
news cycles to fill.
As a long term media watcher, I understand why there is more frustration on the part of GOP supporters with the MSM. They do lean somewhat left, but more than that, the bias has been going on for decades without change or correction. I keep wondering why a problem goes so long without an attempt at a solution.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, the conservative media (a necessary result of the left bias of the MSM) is even worse in pursuing its bias. But at least there's something readily available on the other side.
What would be interesting would be a really well-rounded news organization. Haven't found it yet.