Back in 2009, German Green Party
politician Malte Spitz sued his wireless carrier T-Mobile in an attempt to get
six months worth of metadata from his cell phone that the company had collected
and stored.
Under the European Data Retention Directive,
telecommunications service companies are required to store clients' personal
data for a period of between six months and two years as follows:
“7) The
Conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 19 December 2002
underline that, because of the significant growth in the possibilities afforded
by electronic communications, data relating to the use of electronic
communications are particularly important and therefore a valuable tool in the
prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, in
particular organised crime.
(8) The
Declaration on Combating Terrorism adopted by the European Council on 25 March
2004 instructed the Council to examine measures for establishing rules on the
retention of communications traffic data by service providers.
(9) Under
Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), everyone has the right to respect for his private
life and his correspondence. Public authorities may interfere with the exercise
of that right only in accordance with the law and where necessary in a
democratic society, inter alia, in the interests of national security or public
safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, or for the protection of the rights
and freedoms of others. Because retention of data has proved to be such a
necessary and effective investigative tool for law enforcement in several
Member States, and in particular concerning serious matters such as organised
crime and terrorism, it is necessary to ensure that retained data are made
available to law enforcement authorities for a certain period, subject to the
conditions provided for in this Directive. The adoption of an instrument on
data retention that complies with the requirements of Article 8 of the ECHR is
therefore a necessary measure.”
Even though the directive is
supposed to protect the clients' right to privacy, telecom companies are
required to collect data that will identify the users and details of phone
calls and emails sent but not the actual content of those emails (i.e. collecting the
metadata). This information is to be provided to law enforcement
authorities upon their request.
Unfortunately for Europe, each
nation within the EU has its own set of regulations making data collection an
unlevel playing field for both consumers and service providers as shown on this country-by-country chart for the year 2010:
This is what the same data
availability looked like two short years earlier (noting that Germany collected
metadata at that point in time):
If you don't think too deeply about
it, the collection of metadata sounds rather harmless, doesn't it? After
all, if they aren't tracking exactly what you are saying, what's the harm?
To answer the last question, let's go back to Mr. Spitz.
After getting 6 months worth of metadata (35,830 pieces of data all told)
from his cell phone, he published the data on the weekly German Zeit
Online website with the information posted on a map on a minute by minute
basis. Here is an example of one day's worth of data including the number
of incoming and outgoing calls and messages and the total time that he was
connected to the internet:
While one day's data looks rather
innocuous, when you hit the play button on the graphic, you can track Mr. Spitz's travels
throughout Germany and see the time that he's outside the country and exactly
where he is on a very detailed basis:
If you happen to want even more
detail on where he spent six months, here is a link to the Google Docs showing the
raw information.
Recalling that we are being assured
that the NSA has only been collecting metadata (more than a trillion records over a five year period) and
not the actual contents of our emails and conversations, do you feel better
about what you retain of your privacy now that you've seen how metadata can be
used?
Great work, much appreciated. We fought this in Norway (DLD) and its postponed from april 2012 to january 2015. Im hoping public outcry will build around this once more.
ReplyDeleteDon't believe for a moment they're not collecting the contents of conversations as well.
ReplyDeleteUp until recently, we were told they weren't collecting metadata either, weren't we?
Liars lie, figurers figure, and government spies.
Why not use old-fashioned snail-mail to communicate?
ReplyDelete