In this posting, I'm going to look
at one of the key reasons why the current recovery is different for unemployed
Americans. As you will see, looking back three recessions, one aspect of
the economy has prevented the jobs picture from improving as quickly as it
might.
Let's open with this graph showing the number of government
jobs in the United States since the beginning of the Great Recession in
December 2007:
At the beginning of the recession,
there were 22.376 million government workers in the United States. This
rose to a peak of 22.992 million in May 2010 and fell back to a post-recession
low of 21.826 million, rising ever slightly to its current level of 21.857
million. That means that since the Great Recession took hold, the economy
has seen 519,000 government jobs vanish or 2.32 percent of the pre-recession
total.
Now, let's look back at the second
last recession that stretched from March 2001 to November 2001. I'll look
at government employment data for a 53 month period beyond the end of that
recession to match the time period in the first part of this posting:
You'll notice right away that this graph is almost a perfect inversion of the first graph. At the beginning of the 2001
recession, there were 20.945 million government workers in the United States.
This rose to 21.326 million by the end of the recession and kept rising
throughout most of the remaining 53 months, hitting 21.754 million in April
2005. That's an overall increase of 809,000 jobs or 3.86 percent
of the total pre-recession government workforce.
Lastly, let's look back total
government employment during and after the twin recessions of 1980 and 1981 -
1982:
At the beginning of the 1980
recession, there were 16.201 million government workers in the United States.
This fell to a low of 15.89 million during the middle of the 1981 - 1982
portion of the recession but then rose fairly rapidly, hitting 16.765 million
in April 1986. That's an overall increase of 564,000 jobs or 3.48 percent
of the total pre-recession government workforce.
Basically, while not a terribly
scientific sampling, during the second- and third-last recessions, 4 years and
five months after the end of a recession, government employment rose by around
3.6 percent from its pre-recession level. In the case of the Great
Recession, a 3.6 percent increase would have meant that 805,500 government jobs
should have been added by this point in the recovery, however, as I noted
above, we have seen losses of 519,000 government jobs. If we add the
two together, that's a total loss of 1.325 million potential and actual
government jobs.
With November's
BLS data showing that there were 10.9 million unemployed Americans,
the addition of 1.325 million government jobs would certainly go a long way to
actually reducing the unemployment rate, rather than relying on an
ever-decreasing labor force participation rate to do the heavy lifting.
Unfortunately, this is one of the prices that we all pay for mounting and
nearly unserviceable government debt levels. While there is no doubt that governments do have to cut spending, now we can see quite clearly that there are consequences for the flagrant overspending that has taken place over the past decade.
Government employment should always be a decreasing number. Too much redundancy. Government is in the business of making buggy whips. Not very useful at all.
ReplyDeleteWow ... correleation being used as causation. One can easily conclude (just as validly) that recessions result in less government revenue which result in government layoffs. Refusal to follow such layoffs (such as in 2001 - 2002 and 2010 - 2011) leads to very high government debt, which we now have. Washington needs to wake up --- when one's household income is reduced, one cannot continue their previous life-style and expect finances to get better.
ReplyDeleteBravo, this country needs it's citizens to stand up in 2014/2016 and send everyone home and start over! For lack of a better word, fire everyone in congress and senate!!
DeleteA great report put together by Wells Fargo dovetails very nicely with this Viable Opposition post. If you review it at the link below pay attention to pages 4,5,and 6.
ReplyDeletehttps://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/downloads/pdf/com/insights/economics/special-reports/Our_Favorite_Charts_of_2013_12232013.pdf