Time passes quickly in Washington. It seems like only yesterday that the October debt ceiling crisis ended up with a shutdown that saw hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of a job. At that time, in an attempt to resolve the latest
version of the ongoing United States debt crisis, the Senate and the House passed
the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014 that
allowed the federal government to "temporarily solve" the debt
ceiling and government shutdowns. In the Act, the government is funded
until January 15, 2014 and the debt ceiling is suspended until February 7,
2014, kicking the can just a bit further down the road. With this new
deadline just under 6 weeks away and with the Christmas and New Years break
coming up, it looks like there is going to be yet another debt crisis looming
in early 2014. While we occasionally hear that Washington is getting its
fiscal house of cards in order, the data shown in this posting may give us
pause to ponder the veracity of that claim.
In this posting, I'd like to look at
a few graphs and a bit of data that shows how critical the situation is
becoming, how Congress and the Senate are now in uncharted fiscal territory and how difficult it will be to turn this boat around.
Let's start with a graph that shows total public debt as a percentage of GDP:
At its level of 100.46 percent in
the second quarter of 2013, the level of debt is now at its second highest
level, falling just short of the 101.43 percent record level seen in the first
quarter of 2013. To put these numbers into perspective, when President
Obama took office in January 2009, the debt-to-GDP level was a "mere"
77.37 percent.
The U.S. federal debt can be broken
into two parts; the portion that is "loaned" from one part of
government to another also known as intergovernmental debt and the portion that
is actually market debt (i.e. Treasuries of all types) held by the public.
The debt held by the public includes all federal
debt held by individuals, corporations, state and local governments, Federal
Reserve Banks, foreign governments and all other entities outside of the United
States. Here is a graph that shows the federal debt held by the public as a percentage of GDP:
At its level of 71.46 percent in the
second quarter of 2013, the level of debt held by the public is also now at its
second highest level, falling just short of the 72.1 percent level seen in the
first quarter of 2013. Looking way back to the first quarter of 2009 when
President Obama's dream was still alive, the publicly held debt-to-GDP level
was a "measly" 47.54 percent.
Here's a graph that shows the interest owing on the federal debt as a percentage of GDP:
You will notice that relative to the
1980s and 1990s, that the current level of interest owing on the debt as a
percentage of GDP appears to be quite healthy. For example, in 2012,
interest owing on the debt was 1.36 percent of GDP, a level rarely seen since
the psychedelic sixties and seventies and well down from the 3 percent plus
level seen in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It is this very issue that
has lulled Washington into an unrealistic sense of well-being, much as the
psychotropic drugs of the sixties and seventies lulled baby boomers into an
alternate reality because of our current environment of near zero interest
rates. As shown on this chart, the amount of interest paid on the
outstanding federal debt in fiscal 2013 was still the fourth highest on record
even with the lowest overall interest rate ever seen on Treasuries:
This indicates quite clearly that
when interest rates rise to historical levels, that Washington will be seeing
interest owing as a percentage of GDP rising to new record levels even if the
economy shows robust growth.
Now, let's look at the federal surplus/deficit as a percent of GDP:
Ignoring the massive spending and
resulting deficits during the war effort in the 1940s, federal deficits as a
percentage of GDP hit a new record in 2009, hitting -9.8 percent of GDP.
Certainly things have improved since the depths of the Great Recession,
however, 2012's deficit of 6.69 percent of GDP is still the fourth worst on
record excluding the Second World War. It's also interesting to note the
overwhelming number of years that deficit spending has taken place. In
total, of the 84 years since 1929, deficit spending has taken place in 70 years
within only two year,s 1948 and 2000, seeing a budget surpluses in excess of 2
percent of GDP. On average, the budget has run an average deficit of 3.0
percent. Perhaps this explains why we're in the mess that has now become
our new reality!
Lastly, let's look at federal net outlays as a percentage of GDP:
Again, ignoring World War Two, as a
percentage of GDP, net federal spending while down from its Great Recession
highs of 24.4 percent of GDP, is still at one of its highest levels in the past
65 years at 21.77 percent of GDP. On average, since 1929, federal
spending as a percentage of GDP has averaged 18.1 percent so, at current
levels, federal spending is still quite elevated.
It is quite clear from this data
that it is highly unlikely that the current political environment in Washington
will allow the federal government to turn this "debt boat" around, particularly if interest rates rise and economic growth slumps.
The most likely scenario is that Congress and the Senate will choose to
kick the debt can further down the road, hoping for the best and not planning for the worst. It's always easiest to maintain the status quo and always hardest to change course, particularly when fiscal momentum is not in one's favour. While the debt crisis looms year after year, it certainly appears that they'd rather spend their time renaming post offices and arguing about political differences than actually doing something that may improve the lot for future generations of Americans.
That's largely why the current fiscal battle is all uphill.
That's largely why the current fiscal battle is all uphill.
Love the charts but I feel that chart #6 may be somewhat more comforting then it should be because of the "scale" they chose to use, changing the scale paints a dire picture. Also if I'm correct, recent changes in the way GDP is figured that shows growth as more robust also lessens the ratio of debt to GDP. Bottom-line all this is ugly and a world wide problem with modern governments that think they are immune to the laws of economics.
ReplyDelete