Updated March 2017
A study published in Endocrinology looks at the chemicals used in fracking and finds that the contamination of both ground and surface water by the more than 750 chemicals used in the process is not insignificant when measured in terms of their endocrine-disrupting nature with a recent study showing that over 100 of these ingredients having the ability to cause negative health effects through the human endocrine system. These chemicals are termed endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs. EDC's have the ability to mimic or block the effects of the body's reproductive hormones and exposure to these chemicals has been linked to birth defects, cancer and infertility.
A study published in Endocrinology looks at the chemicals used in fracking and finds that the contamination of both ground and surface water by the more than 750 chemicals used in the process is not insignificant when measured in terms of their endocrine-disrupting nature with a recent study showing that over 100 of these ingredients having the ability to cause negative health effects through the human endocrine system. These chemicals are termed endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs. EDC's have the ability to mimic or block the effects of the body's reproductive hormones and exposure to these chemicals has been linked to birth defects, cancer and infertility.
The authors from the Department of
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health and the Department of Health
Management and Informatics, both at the University of Missouri and the United
States Geological Survey, collected water samples in Garfield County, Colorado where the drilling
density is high (there are more than 10,000 natural gas wells in the area) and
fracking is commonly used in drilling operations. Looking at the bigger
picture in Colorado, there are now about 30,000 active wells in the state, up
markedly from 5700 twenty years ago. In the study, unique water samples
were collected from five fracking fluid spill sites, two reference sites and
the Colorado River. These samples were tested for twenty-four chemicals
used in natural gas drilling operations and were measured for both estrogen
(female) and androgen (male) receptor activities in human cells.
Let's open by looking at at map of
Colorado from FracTracker showing the outline of shale basins (in light
orange) and shale plays (in pink), where directional wells are being drilled in
the state (in dark orange) and where spills from directional wells have taken
place (in yellow):
Here is a map showing the outline of
counties in Colorado along with oil wells (in green) and gas wells in red),
noting that Garfield County is located in the northwest quadrant of the
state:
As an aside, spills of fracking related fluids
were of recent concern to Colorado state officials after flooding in September 2013
damaged areas in northern eastern Colorado that had high concentrations of oil industry
infrastructure as you can see on the map. With over 50,000 drill sites in Colorado alone, the
problems with spills and related contamination of both surface and subsurface
water could be catastrophic.
As further background, estrogen
and androgen receptors are proteins that are found within human cells that are
activated by these two hormones. Estrogen and androgen influence much of
human physiology including reproduction, cardiovascular health, cognition and
behaviour. Given its importance in the human body, estrogen is linked to
the development of many diseases including breast, ovarian, colorectal and
prostate cancers, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and obesity. In
the case of breast cancer, estrogen binds to the estrogen receptors and
stimulates growth of breast cells. The increased rate of breast cell
growth increases the odds that some cells will be mutated, resulting in the
development of cancer. As well, estrogen metabolism can result in the
creation of toxic by-products that can directly damage DNA, again resulting in
the initiation or promotion of cancer cells. Obviously, human physiology
is very susceptible to anything introduced from the environment that either
magnifies or diminishes the impact of both androgen and estrogen.
Let's go back to the study. Of
the 39 samples, 89 percent measured positive for estrogenic activities, 41
percent measured positive for anti-estrogenic activities, 12 percent measured
positive for androgenic activities and 46 percent measured positive for
anti-androgenic activities. As well, the Colorado River, the main
drainage waterway in the area exhibited moderate levels of estrogenic,
anti-estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities suggesting that contamination is
occurring from know natural gas activity spills into the river. In
comparison, water samples taken from less drilling intensive areas showed the
lowest levels of contamination with endocrine disrupting chemicals.
Here is a link and some screen captures
showing a partial list of fracking chemical additives that were proposed for use in the
State of New York by the oil industry:
The various chemicals which comprise
up to 2 percent of the total fluids used during fracking act as proppants to
keep fractures open, acidize perforations to allow access from the drill pipe
to the rock interface, bactericides that prevent the growth of hydrogen
sulphide (rotten egg gas), prevent movement of clay particles that could block
pores, reduce the development of rust and increase fluid viscosity.
In 2005, under the Bush-Cheney
Administration, fracking was exempted from the provisions under the Safe
Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act (known as the
Halliburton loophole) under the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Here is
Section 322 of the Energy Policy Act showing the exclusion of hydraulic fracturing from the Safe
Drinking Water Act regulations:
Back in 2010, the Environmental
Protection Agency stated that it would undertake a thorough study on the
environmental impact of fracking with the study to be completed in 2014,
however, the EPA has recently announced that the final report will not be
released until 2016.
To close, I want to take a quote
from Garfield County's webpage on the oil and natural gas industry and its use of frac chemicals:
"Just
as household cleaning agents may be lethal in high concentrations, some frac
fluid constituents may be harmful in certain concentrations and not in others."
At last, we can rest easy,
assured that our health is in good hands.
When is enough enough? I love how acts passed by with names like Safe Drinking Water Act or Clean Water Act, do neither and act as loopholes for corps to do more polluting.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you have an ad prompting Keystone XL Pipeline on the bottom of your page?
ReplyDeleteThe latest EPA research report on fracking proves that alarmist and scientifically uninformed media reports about fracking were mostly hype. Fracked natural gas is far better for the environment than mining and burning coal (still the most common fuel for electricity generation, tar sands oil, and oil pipelines (that have bursted and polluted mostly pristine rivers such as the Yellowstone River). Nothing is zero risk. The question to ask is, risky in comparison with what?
ReplyDelete