Interesting data released from the Census
Bureau gives us some sense of why the housing market, particularly in some
areas of the United States, is not recovering.
Here is the graph that tells the
story:
Non-seasonally adjusted home
ownership rates peaked at 69.2 percent in both the second and fourth quarter of
2004. Since then, they have drifted lower, hitting the current level of
64.8 percent in the first quarter of 2014. This brings us back to
ownership levels last seen in mid-1995. At the end of the recession in
the second quarter of 2009, home ownership rates were still at 67.4 percent and
have continued to fall since then.
Home ownership rates vary
substantially across the nation as show here with current and levels in the
second quarter of 2009:
Northeast: current - 62.4 percent
Q2 2009 - 64.3 percent
Midwest: current - 69.3 percent
Q2 2009 - 70.5 percent
South: current - 66.5 percent
Q2 2009 - 70.0 percent
West: current - 59.4 percent
Q2 2009 - 62.5 percent
Home ownership rates are lowest in
the western part of the United States, just as they were at the end of the
Great RecessionIn all regions, home ownership rates are down from the end of
the Great Recession, most substantially in the south and west where ownership
rates dropped by 3.5 percentage points and 3.1 percentage points respectively
or 5 percent in both areas.
It is also interesting to see how
homeownership rates by age have changed since 2009 as shown here:
Under 35 years: current - 36.2
percent Q2 2009 - 39 percent
35 to 44 years: current 60.7 percent
Q2 2009 - 66.8 percent
45 to 54 years: current 71.4 percent
Q2 2009 - 74.5 percent
55 to 64 years: current 76.4 percent
Q2 2009 - 79.9 percent
65 and older: current - 79.9 percent
Q2 2009 - 80.4 percent
Home ownership rates dropped the most
for households aged 35 to 44 years with a drop of 6.1 percentage points or 9.1
percent from Q2 2009 to the present. Home ownership rates for households
aged 65 and older barely budged.
Lastly, here is a look at home
ownership rates by family income (above or below median) and how rates have changed since 2009:
Above median: current -
79.8 percent Q2 2009 - 82.2 percent
Below median: current -
49.8 percent Q2 2009 - 51.5 percent
The drop in homeownership rates for
both income groups was roughly the same on a percentage basis.
Several factors are working against
potential homeowners:
1.) The recent rise in the price of homes in some of
America's largest markets.
2.) Mortgage rates that have risen from under 3.5 percent in early 2013 to nearly 4.5 percent today (30 year mortgage rates).
3.) Tight mortgage lending standards
4.) A job market that seems capable of producing millions of low-paying jobs to replace higher-paying jobs.
These factors are working together to put home ownership out
of reach for many Americans, particularly those Americans that are under the age of 45. With
the shrinking number of Americans that are becoming homeowners, one has to
wonder how sustained the resurrection in housing prices will be.
This issue is becoming a bit of a conundrum and conflicts with the message being bantered about that "things are getting better." I have owned an apartment complex for many years and we are currently experiencing the largest number of vacancies we have ever had. Many houses in the area are empty or under leased. In 2005 and 2006 prior to the housing collapse many people were looking at second homes, for investments or as a vacation getaway.
ReplyDeleteToday not only have many people shed the extra home many have doubled up with family or friends reducing the need for housing. We are pushing on a string and calling it demand when someone who can barely pay the rent is encouraged by the government to buy a house they can neither afford or maintain. We have a shortage of "qualified" buyers and renters. More on how low interest rates are hurting housing in the article below,
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/12/super-low-interest-rates-disservive-to.html
Excellent, thoughtful and analytical post. Today's application for new home sales data, down 16% YoY, clearly substantiates your analysis
ReplyDelete