As the ongoing conflict
with ISIS continues, over the past few months, we frequently hear something
resembling the following:
With these criticisms of
the current Administration's policies, let's look at one key American
beneficiary of the ramping up of anti-ISIS ground and air forces in Iraq.
SOS International,
also known as SOSi, was founded in New York City in 1989 by Sosi Setian, a
Columbia University-educated Armenian American and is the largest family-wound business in the defense
contracting industry. Ms. Setian worked with several U.S. government
agencies including the DEA, FBI and U.S. Customs Services before staring her
own company which provided translation and interpretation services to federal,
state and local law enforcement communities. SOSi's mandate has morphed
over the past 25 years and the company has provided a wide range of specialized consulting
services to the Department of Defense Special Operations Command, contract
intelligence analysis services to the U.S. military in Iraq, operating and managing the Counter-Narcotics Customs and Border Management Training Academies for the
Afghan Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Finance and providing airfield infrastructure
construction and engineering in Iraq for the U.S. Air Force among other duties.
The company now terms itself "an international solution
provider". In 2014, SOSi formed a Board of Advisors to "assist
in the company's organic growth, acquisitions and professionalization.".
We will take a closer look at the Board of Advisors later in this
posting.
Let's look at what SOSi
has been up to recently. According to their website, in 2015, the company
was "awarded prime contracts, valued in excess of $400 million, to provide
life support, sustainment and logistics services in support of thousands of
U.S. and coalition troops in Iraq." Here are three of the contracts
as reported by Iraq Business News:
1.) Camp Taji, Iraq (1):
Camp Taji is a military
installation located north of the city of Baghdad. It was originally a
Republican Guard base and was a centre for the manufacture of chemical weapons.
It is currently being used to house members of the new Iraqi Army with the purpose of training members of Iraq's new Air Force. Under the terms of
the contract, "SOSi will provide all services, equipment
supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials and supervision
necessary to meet the needs of several thousand deployed U.S. coalition forces
and contractors. This included lodging, office space, command and control
centre operation, emergency fire and medical services, meal services, bulk
water, bulk fuel, prime power, internet and IT communications, general
facilities maintenance operations and site security.".
2.) Camp Taji, Iraq (2):
Notice that one bid was
solicited for this $100 million contract and only one bid was received.
The contract is expected to be completed on June 30, 2018.
This compound is also
being used to train soldiers from the Iraqi Army as shown on this document from the Combined Joint Task
Force, Operation Inherent Resolve:
Now, as promised, let's
look at SOSi's Board of Advisors. Here is a
photo of the Board which is "comprised of leaders drawn from the
government contracting and defense and security sectors":
Do you recognize anyone?
Take a closer look at the gentleman on the far left in the back row.
That's one Dr. Paul Wolfowitz, former President of the
World Bank, U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia and, most importantly, U.S. Deputy
Secretary of Defense under Donald Rumsfeld between 2001 and 2005. He was the chief architect of
the Bush II Adminstration's policies on Iraq prior to and during the Iraq war
and is also considered to be a key figure behind the "Project for a New
American Century" (PNAC), a non-profit, ultraconservative organization that was established
in 1997, dedicating itself to the proposition that "American leadership is good
for America and the world" and that U.S. policy toward Saddam Hussein
should entail the removal of his leadership from Iraq. PNAC sent this letter to President Bill Clinton on
February 19, 1998 advocating the following:
•
Recognize a provisional government of Iraq based on the
principles and leaders of the Iraqi National Congress (INC) that is
representative of all the peoples of Iraq.
•
Restore and enhance the safe haven in northern Iraq to allow
the provisional government to extend its authority there and establish a zone
in southern Iraq from which Saddam's ground forces would also be
excluded.
•
Lift sanctions in liberated areas. Sanctions are instruments
of war against Saddam's regime, but they should be quickly lifted on those who
have freed themselves from it. Also, the oil resources and products of the
liberated areas should help fund the provisional government's insurrection and humanitarian
relief for the people of liberated Iraq.
•
Release frozen Iraqi assets -- which amount to $1.6 billion
in the United States and Britain alone -- to the control of the provisional
government to fund its insurrection. This could be done gradually and so long
as the provisional government continues to promote a democratic Iraq.
•
Facilitate broadcasts from U.S. transmitters immediately and
establish a Radio Free Iraq.
•
Help expand liberated areas of Iraq by assisting the
provisional government's offensive against Saddam Hussein's regime logistically
and through other means.
•
Remove any vestiges of Saddam's claim to
"legitimacy" by, among other things, bringing a war crimes indictment
against the dictator and his lieutenants and challenging Saddam's credentials
to fill the Iraqi seat at the United Nations.
•
Launch a systematic air campaign against the pillars of his
power -- the Republican Guard divisions which prop him up and the military
infrastructure that sustains him.
•
Position U.S. ground force equipment in the region so that,
as a last resort, we have the capacity to protect and assist the anti-Saddam
forces in the northern and southern parts of Iraq.
Of the many neoconservative signatories to the letter we find the name Hon. Paul
Wolfowitz, Dean of John Hopkins SAIS (Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies).
It's nice to see that a
voice from the past has reappeared as a key advisor to a family-owned American
company that is benefitting to the tune of $400 million in (taxpayer-funded)
contracts awarded for services provided in Dr. Wolfowitz's old stomping
grounds. After all, the Iraqi War Part I worked so well, why not get in on the ground floor of Part II?
At least now we know who in the
United States is really benefitting from the ongoing battle against ISIS....
It is a mess and the easy answer as to who benefits is the makers of weapons! War is often not the easy solution many people think it will be.
ReplyDeleteGlaring examples of America's lack of a sound strategy in fighting ISIS are presented in articles such as the May 23 Washington Post story that paints a picture of total chaos and mayhem garnered from the accounts of fighters in the city of Ramadi that recently fell. Bottom-line is the Iraqi's remain conflicted and ununited, this makes them unreliable as a fighting force.
No amount of money or training will ever solve this problem. Iraqi security forces lost 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles when ISIS overran Mosul last year. This represents well over $1 billion of American tax payers money. The article below delves into our botched effort and how little progress is being made.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2015/06/isis-undeterred-by-weak-us-strategy.html
Excellent post.
ReplyDelete