There is one issue that
the Federal Reserve's protracted period of near-zero interest rates have
created that doesn't receive a great deal of coverage in the mainstream media.
This issue could prove to be a significant problem for millions of
hapless small investors who have been doing their best to get a reasonable
return on their meagre savings. Please note that I will be using the terms "high yield debt" and "junk bonds" interchangeably throughout this posting.
Here is a graph from Thomson Reuters' Debt Capital Markets Review
for the first nine months of 2015 showing the volume of high yield corporate
debt (i.e. junk bonds) that have been issued globally every quarter since 2007:
You can easily seen how
the volume of junk bonds has grown since the end of the Great Recession as
interest rates have fallen and remained at generational lows. Global high
yield debt volumes decreased 19.8 percent in the first three quarters of 2015
compared to the previous year, however, a total of $297.3 billion of junk debt
was still issued over the nine months. Yields rose from 6.4 percent in Q2
2015 to 6.8 percent in Q3 2015 with an annual average of 6.3 percent for all of
2015 so far, still hardly reflecting the risks involved.
There have been two main
factors at work in the global junk bond market over the past six years:
1.) Less creditworthy
companies wanted to issue debt at ultra-low interest rates that simply didn't
reflect the risks involved because they could raise a lot of cash without paying a lot of interest.
2.) Debt
markets/investors demanded a reasonable return on their investment dollars and
since interest rates on Treasuries, other government bonds and creditworthy
corporations were unreasonably low, the demand for higher yielding junk bonds
grew significantly.
This graphic shows the
issue type composition for the world's top global debt bookrunners (i.e.
underwriter for the bonds being issued) for the period between January 1, 2015
and September 30, 2015 with junk bonds being coloured turquoise:
For every underwriting
bank with the exception of Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse, more than 14
percent of their total bonds issued over the 9 month period consisted of junk
bonds with Wells Fargo having the highest proportion of junk bonds at 19
percent of their total underwriting over the period.
Let's take a look at the
issuance of high yield debt in the United States for the first 9 months of 2015
as shown on this table:
In total, in the first 9
months of the year, Wall Street banks have issued $216.499 billion in high
yield corporate debt, down 11.8 percent from the same period in 2014.
These dubious investments have earned the top ten issuers $2.105 billion
in underwriting fees, down 14.5 percent from the previous year. JP Morgan is, once
again, the largest book runner with 142 deals for 46.1 percent of the market
share on deals with proceeds of $24.518 billion. For their troubles, JPM
has earned $333.9 million in fees. You can see why Wall Street loves a sucker!
Now that we have that
background, let's look at what has happened to all of this "junk"
that has been floating around. Keep in mind that bond yields act
inversely to price; as the price of a bond drops (i.e. because it is seen as a
risky investment), yields will rise and vice versa. As well, the spread
between a bond that is deemed a "zero risk investment" like a
Treasury and a junk bond (CCC-rated in blue) will normally be higher than
between a Treasury and an investment grade corporate bond (AAA-rated in red) as
you can see on this graph:
Here's what has
happened to the yield on CCC-rated/junk bonds since the end of the Great
Recession:
The yield on junk
bonds fell to a post-Great Recession low of 7.9 percent in June 2014.
Since then, it has risen to 16.73 percent, finally reflecting the risk
involved in many of these bonds that Wall Street has made billions of dollars
in commissions selling to unwary investors.
As I noted above, bond
yields and prices act inversely to each other. As such, here is a chart showing what has happened to
Barclay's High Yield Bond ETF over the past year:
JNK is now at its lowest
level over the past year. If we look back further in time, here's what has happened to JNK since December 2007:
Not only is JNK at its
lowest level over the past twelve months, it is now at its lowest level since
July 2009. This would suggest that many investors have seen the value of
their high yield bond holdings decline substantially in value as the market is
awakening to the fact that many of these bonds, particularly those issued by
the beleaguered commodity sector, (i.e. oil) are starting to reflect their true risk profile. If you want some idea of how big this problem could be, here is a graphic showing the historical volume (in billions of dollars) of B, BB and CCC-rated debt is in the United States:
Estimates by UBS suggest that 35 to 40 percent of the American high yield debt is "at risk", working out to roughly $1.05 trillion to $1.2 trillion in low quality speculative grade debt that will be difficult to refinance.
Estimates by UBS suggest that 35 to 40 percent of the American high yield debt is "at risk", working out to roughly $1.05 trillion to $1.2 trillion in low quality speculative grade debt that will be difficult to refinance.
Thanks to the Federal
Reserve and its braintrust, American investors (and others around the world)
are likely to feel a great deal of pain over the coming months as the global
economy looks set to slow down and the corporate world finds itself unable to service its mounting debt levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment