The World Economic Forum
has just released the 2016 version of its Global Risks Report, a
look at the ways that various global risks will develop and interact over the
coming decade. The authors of the report survey nearly 750 experts
and decision-makers, drawn from academia, business and the public sector around
the globe, asking them to consider 29 global risks in five main categories -
societal, economic, technological, geopolitical and environmental - and rank
each on their perception of the likelihood of the risk occurring and its
impact on the global village.
Here is a graphic showing
how the top five global risks in terms of likelihood have evolved since
2007 with blue being economic, green being environmental, orange being
geopolitical, red being societal and purple being technological:
In light of the ongoing
migrant crisis in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, the large scale
involuntary migration of people is at the top of the the list followed by two
climate-related risks; extreme weather events (which have been in second place
for three years running) and the failure of climate-change mitigation and
adaptation.
Here is a graphic showing
how the top five global risks in terms of impact have evolved since
2007:
At the top of the list in
terms of impact on the globe we find the failure of climate change mitigation
and adaptation.
Here is a graphic showing
the top five global risks over the next ten years:
You'll notice how the
first four risks are related to climate change and the fifth, profound social
instability, is interconnected with climate change. Let's take a brief
look at the number one long-term issue, water. Currently, around 2.7 billion people
or 40 percent of the world's population suffer water shortages for at least a
month every year with future water demand expected to exceed sustainable supply
by 40 percent in 2030. The OECD estimates that 4 billion people could be
living in water-scarce areas by 2050 This problem will only become worse
as the amount of food required by a growing global population rises.
Declining water availability will be most likely in the Middle East,
North Africa and South Asia and is widely believed to have been one of the root causes for the current unrest in Syria.
Let's take a more
in-depth look at the number one risk in terms of likelihood, the large-scale
involuntary migration of humans. In 2014, an estimated 59.5 million
people were forcibly displaced from their homeland, more than the 40 million
who were displaced during World War Two. More than half of these
displaced persons came from three countries; Syria, Afghanistan and Somalia.
Here is a map showing the source nations that are responsible for the
lion's share of conflict-related displaced persons:
Involuntary migration has
become a long-term problem; in the 1980s, the average duration of displacement
was nine years. By the mid-200s, that had lengthened to 20 years.
This becomes problematic because many countries do not have effective
integration policies. As we've seen in Europe, integration of millions of
immigrants is very costly and, where the immigrants end up in less robust
economies, the cost of housing and medical care can consume significant
portions of national GDP.
Let's close this posting
by looking at the risk of a fiscal crisis. Economic concerns are
developing around the massive growth in debt levels by corporations and by
emerging market economies. The IMF estimates that corporations have
over-levered themselves by up to $3.0 trillion, pushing the corporate
debt-to-GDP ratio up by 26 percentage points over the decade between 2004 and
2014. China is a particular point of concern; IMF estimates show that by
the end of 2014, the ratio of total corporate debt liabilities to equity in
China's construction sector exceeded 250 percent. As well, China's oil
and gas sector has seen its debt-to-equity ratio double since 2007.
Thanks, in large part, to the long period of near-zero interest rates,
risk premiums on low quality corporate and emerging market debt has been compressed with the premiums no
longer reflecting the true level of risk involved. With the advent of the
global economy, a weak economic link in one key nation like China could lead to
a domino effect that will impact the entire global economy.
As we can see from this
report, many of the risks to the global economy are interconnected. In
this year's report, the WEO suggests that the key factors in global risk show a
strong connection to global climate change even though, at first glance, they
may not appear to be linked. If climate scientists are correct in
their prognostications, the risks the economy that are associated with global
climate change will only increase as the years pass.
Viewing large scale corporate migration as a threat is a little silly. Many US corporate giants pay no taxes, don't hire Americans, and get billion in government support i.e. my tax dollars. They are "takers", corporate welfare recipients. Given the above I don't see them leaving as having any significant impact inasmuch as they've already done massive amounts of damage. As an American I would encourage them to leave, no, dare them to leave. But they won't. Why? Because there isn't another country like the USA STUPID enough to put up with their crap. They've bought and paid for their politicians, leaving would be a "bad investment".
ReplyDeleteIf you don't want pidgins shitting all over you porch don't feed them. Same applies to migrants ignore them and they will be forced to go away. Where is away? That doesn't matter as long as its not where you are. Nature will take its course if allowed, just allow it. There is no reason for someone in a desert to have six kids when there is only food and water for one. Same applies everywhere but I do think nature will take care of it.
ReplyDelete