An analysis by Catherine
Theohary for the Congressional Research Service looks at official and
unclassified data on conventional arms transfers to developing nations around
the world by the United States over the years between 2008 and 2015. As
well, it compares the value of the American arms transfers to those made by
other nations and provides us with a ranking of which nations were the greatest
beneficiaries of this "generosity".
The total value of all
conventional arms transfer agreements (representing orders for future delivery)
to both developed and developing nations in 2015 was $79.9 billion, down from
$89 billion in 2014. Here is a graphic showing the value of arms transfer
agreements going back to 2008, showing the split between developed and
developing nations:
As you can see on the
graphic, arms sales to developing nations are very important
to the arms industry. Over the years between 2008 and 2015, conventional
arms transfer agreements (which represent orders for future delivery) to
developing nations comprised 80.24 percent of all international arms transfer
agreements with the level hitting 81.7 percent in 2015. Actual arms
deliveries to developing nations comprised 72.69 percent of the total value of
all such arms deliveries in 2015.
Let's look at the volume
of arms that are being sold to developing nations. In 2015, the total
value of arms transfer agreements to developing nations was $65.2 billion, down
from $79.3 billion in 2014. In total during 2015, $33.6 billion of
conventional arms were actually delivered to developing nations. Here is
a table showing the total value of worldwide arms transfer agreements
to developing nations by supplying nation for the periods between 2008 to 2011,
2012 to 2015 and for 2015 alone:
Over the
period between 2008 and 2015, arms sales to developing nations comprised most
of the total transfer value for all supplying nations. As well, in
constant 2015 dollars, the United States is, by a wide margin, the largest
seller of conventional arms to developing nations over the study period with
total sales (arms transfer agreements) of $208.47 billion compared to $86.12
billion for second place Russia and $51.83 billion for France as shown on this
table:
Here is a table showing
the number of each type of weapons that have been supplied to developing nations
over the periods between 2008 to 2011 and 2012 to 2015:
Now, let's look at the
value of United States conventional arms transfers to developing nations.
This is particularly pertinent given that Saudi Arabia appears to be
using weapons, including U.S.-made cluster bombs, against the Houthis in Yemen.
The total value of U.S. arms transfer agreements with developing nations
decreased to $26.7 billion in 2015 from $29.7 billion in 2014.(page 7)
Despite that, the United States market share value of all such agreements
with developing nations rose to 40.99 percent in 2014 from 37.48% in 2014.
In 2015, key agreements were reached with Saudi Arabia, Iraq and South
Korea. These sales included very expensive major weapons systems as well
as upgrades and support of systems that had previously been sold.
Fortunately, thanks to
the Defense Security
Cooperation Agency website, we are able to clearly ascertain what
equipment was sold to each nation by the U.S. defense industry. Since the study covers only the period to the end of 2015, let's
look at what was sold to Middle East nations in 2016 by nation with the value of the agreements in U.S. dollars:
1.) Iraq:
- F-16 weapons,
munitions, equipment and logistics - $1.95 billion
- Hellfire missiles -
$800 million
- KA-350 aircraft -
sustainment - $350 million
- AC-208 aircraft
sustainment, logistics and spares support - $181 million
- AC-208 aircraft,
training and support - $65.3 million
2.) Oman:
- TOW 2B missiles - $51
million
- continuation of
logistics support and equipment - $260 million
3.) Jordan:
- repair and return of
F-16 engines, sustainment and support - $115.1 million
4.) United Arab Emirates:
- AN/AAQ-24(V)N Large
Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures - $225 million
- Hellfire Category III
missiles - $476 million
- munitions sustainment
and support - $785 million
- exercise participation
support - $70 million
- Apache AH-64E
helicopters - $3.5 billion
5.) Saudi Arabia:
- support services - $200
million
- MK15 Phalanx Close-In
Weapons Systems - $154.9 million
- Saudi Abrams Battle
Tanks and Hercules Armed Recovery Vehicles - $1.15 billion
- CH-47 F Chinook cargo
helicopters - $3.51 billion
6.) Qatar:
- RIM-116C Rolling
Airframe Missiles - $260 million
- Javelin Guided Missiles
- $20 million
- Mk-V Fast Patrol boat -
$124.02 million
- F-15QA aircraft - $21.1
billion
- spare C-17 engines and
equipment - $81 million
- continuation of
logistics support services and equipment - $700 million
7.) Kuwait:
- F/A-18 services and
support - $420 million
- field radar system -
$194 million
- F/A-18 Super Hornet
Aircraft - $10.1 billion
- Joint Direct Attack
Munition Tail Kits - $37 million
- recapitalization of
M1A2 tanks - $1.7 billion
8.) Egypt:
- Harpoon Block II
Encapsulated Missiles - $143 million
- Sentinel Radars and
related equipment and support - $70 million
- Common Missile Warning
System for Apache, Blackhawk and Chinook helicopters - $81.4 million
9.) Tunisia:
- Kiowa Warrior Aircraft
equipment - $100.8 million
10.) Israel:
- excess Sea-Hawk
Helicopter equipment and support - $300 million
11.) Morocco:
- TOW 2A Radio Frequency
Missiles - $108 million
As you can see, exporting
their products to the developing nations of the world, particularly the Middle East, brings in significant
revenue to America's military-industrial complex not to mention corporate tax
dollars to Washington. While these sales definitely lead to military
instability in the region, they do keep thousands of Americans in jobs!
Now you see why there is never a chance for peace on this tiny planet. War is forever sustainable.
ReplyDelete