North
Korea's ongoing series of nuclear tests are interesting to me, a geoscientist,
because of the seismic signature that they leave behind. Here is some
background information, showing from a seismic perspective, how North Korea's
ability to produce ever more powerful nuclear weapons is improving.
During
the early stages of the nuclear age between 1945
to 1957, nuclear weapons testing took place in the atmosphere as shown in
this video:
This
led to potential issues since the tests exposed civilian populations to
excessive levels of radiation.
After
the signing of the Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963, most tests took place
underground with the exceptions of China which continued atmosphere testing
until 1980 and France which continued atmospheric testing until 1974. The
explosions from underground testing creates a subsurface cavity which often
collapses, creating a rubble-filled chimney that may go to the surface
depending on the depth of the test. Here is a graphic showing the Nevada
test site and the impact of a nuclear weapons test on the subsurface:
The
only certain way to track these underground tests is through seismic
monitoring. During the nuclear test ban discussions held in 1958, it was
decided that there was a need for a global network of accurately calibrated and
timed instruments that could measure and monitor underground nuclear explosions.
Seismologists had, for some time, recognized the need for a global
network of seismographs to produce the data needed for further global studies
in seismology. This led to the creation of the World-Wide
Standardized Seismic Network or WWSSN. Construction began in 1961 and
was completed at the end of 1967 with the installation of 121 WWSSN systems
plus one which was given to the USSR.
Here
is a map showing the WWSSN stations in 1978:
One
of the major benefits of the WWSSN was its assistance in developing the science
of global plate tectonics, a key aspect of the geoscience world today.
In
1996, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) was
adopted by the United Nations. Here is a map showing the signatory,
ratifying and non-signatory states (in red):
Monitoring
is obviously a very important part of the CTBT Organization. Four types
of monitoring are used including seismic, hydro acoustic, radionuclide and
infrasound. We'll focus on the seismic monitoring for the purposes of
this posting. Seismic
monitoring takes place at 170 seismic stations (50 primary and 120
auxiliary) in 76 nations around the world. The primary stations operate
24 hours a day, 365 days a year and data is relayed in real time to the
International Data Centre in Vienna, Austria. Here is a video which explains how the seismic
monitoring system works:
Now,
let's look at the seismic
history of North Korea's
nuclear tests according to the CTBTO, focussing on the test of September 3,
2017. The "event" was detected at 41 primary and 90 auxiliary
stations along with two hydroacoustic and one infrasound stations. The
event took place at 03:30 UTC on September 3, 2017 and is consistent with a
man-made explosion, however, CTBTO states that the explosion can only be
classified as nuclear once airborne radioactivity is detected, a process which
can take up to55 days which was the case in the 2013 test. The initial
estimate of the event's magnitude was 5.8 which was later revised to 6.1.
Here is a graphic showing how this event's seismic signature compares to
North Korea's other nuclear tests:
As
you can see, there was significantly greater seismic activity after the
September 3, 2017 test than there was in all previous nuclear tests.
Calculations now suggest that the yield of the most recent blast is
approximately 250 kilotons (one quarter of a megaton), by far
North Korea's largest yield as shown here:
By
way of comparison, the Little Boy weapon that destroyed Hiroshima had a yield
of 15 kilotons and the Fat Man weapon that destroyed Nagasaki had a yield of 22
kilotons.
The
data from the latest North Korean nuclear test suggests that the hermit kingdom
has now developed a weapon that would be capable of creating significant damage
to its intended target. With a weapon of this size, accuracy becomes
somewhat less important since destruction will be widespread.
Consistent with a man made explosion can be created with conventional Ultra High Explosives since no radiation of any significance has been detected yet, or in fact in past tests I conclude that NK has no nukes just UHE
ReplyDeleteLA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment:
ReplyDeleteNORTH KOREA NUKE FREE
http://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2017/04/north-korea-nuke-free-white-house.html