With Donald Trump making the following
comments on NATO and the deadbeat nations that weren't paying
their share:
...a recent publication from Poland's Ministry of
National Defense is of particular interest. Here is a summary of what is
found in this document that received very little media coverage.
The document, "Proposal for a U.S.
Permanent Presence in Poland" opens by noting Donald Trump's July 6, 2017
speech given in Warsaw as you can see here:
...where he made the following comments:
"Today, the West is also
confronted by the powers that seek to test our will, undermine our confidence,
and challenge our interests. To meet new forms of aggression, including
propaganda, financial crimes, and cyberwarfare, we must adapt our alliance to
compete effectively in new ways and on all new battlefields.
We urge Russia to cease its
destabilizing activities in Ukraine and elsewhere, and its support for hostile
regimes — including Syria and Iran — and to instead join the community of
responsible nations in our fight against common enemies and in defense of civilization
itself.
As long as we know our history, we will
know how to build our future. Americans know that a strong alliance
of free, sovereign and independent nations is the best defense for our freedoms
and for our interests. That is why my administration has demanded
that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligation.
As a result of this insistence,
billions of dollars more have begun to pour into NATO. In fact,
people are shocked. But billions and billions of dollars more are
coming in from countries that, in my opinion, would not have been paying so
quickly...
Words are easy, but actions are what
matters. And for its own protection — and you know this, everybody
knows this, everybody has to know this — Europe must do more. Europe
must demonstrate that it believes in its future by investing its money to
secure that future.
That is why we applaud Poland for its
decision to move forward this week on acquiring from the United States the
battle-tested Patriot air and missile defense system — the best anywhere in the
world. That is also why we salute the Polish people for being one of
the NATO countries that has actually achieved the benchmark for investment in
our common defense. Thank you. Thank you, Poland. I
must tell you, the example you set is truly magnificent, and we applaud
Poland. Thank you."
Let's start this posting by looking at NATO's current infrastructure in Poland:
Poland is one of only five NATO members that spends at least two percent of its
GDP on defense, with plans to expand that to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2030, as
shown here:
...however, as shown here, the size of its military in terms of armed
forces personnel has declined significantly:
Poland joined NATO in 1999 along with two other post-Soviet
states; Hungary and the Czech Republic, bringing the organizations total
membership to 19 member states. Poland currently hosts the NATO
Multinational Corps Northeast, a NATO Force Integration Unit and a U.S. aviation
detachment and units from a rotational U.S. Armoured Combat Brigade Team and
will host a ballistic defence missile site under the European Phased Adaptive
Approach, scheduled for completion in 2018. Poland also hosted over
16,000 U.S. military personnel for various military exercises during 2017.
Nonetheless, the document goes on to note that:
"Given Moscow's predilection
for aggressive posturing, now is not the time for a reduced U.S. presence in
Europe, particularly on NATO's eastern flank along Poland's border...A
permanent American military presence in Poland would significantly reduce
security vulnerabilities in the region, particularly in the Suwalki Gap. U.S.
military leaders, like U.S. Army Europe commander Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, have
noted that a narrow piece of land connecting two NATO member states Poland and
Lithuania (the Suwalki Gap) could be a target of Russian military aggression,
thereby needlessly exposing Polish and NATO forces in the region to a period of
potentially escalated conflict.
For your illumination, here is a map
showing the Suwalki gap, a 64-mile long stretch of land along the
border between Poland and Lithuania, searing Belarus from Kaliningrad
which, if was controlled by Russia, would mean that the Baltic states of Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia would be cut off from the rest of Europe:
So, in light of the so-called Russian
threat, what does Poland propose? They propose that a permanent American
military presence in Poland will result in a reduction in Poland's security
vulnerabilities, particularly given that Poland's leadership feels that it is
in the crosshairs of Moscow's invasion agenda (i.e. Georgia and Ukraine/Crimea) and that it is under the threat of Russian troops that could, in
the future, be left behind following military exercises in neighbouring
Belarus. To encourage the United States to permanently station troops in
Poland, the document suggests the following:
1.) establish a framework for financing
the construction and upkeep of military installations including allowing
American personnel to us additional infrastructure that belongs to Poland's
Ministry of National Defense, state and local administrative facilities and
other state-owned or state-managed entities.
2.) contribute $1.5 to $2.0 billion to
cover the cost of facilitating the stationing of one U.S. armoured division or
equivalent in Poland.
Since under Poland's tax law, Allied
Armed Forces are exempt from most taxes, investments made by U.S.-based
companies to build infrastructure will not be subject to Polish taxes, something that will make the American military-industrial complex very happy.
Here's the conclusion of the report:
"Poland is a steadfast ally of the
United States and is committed to advancing our shared interests and values,
which are increasingly being threatened by Russian interference. A permanent
U.S. presence in Poland will ensure that both nations can continue to advance,
strengthen, and protect these values and interests.
The Government of Poland understands
that such a burden must be shared, which is why the Government is committed to
providing significant host-nation support for this undertaking. Such expenses
cannot and should not be financed by one country alone.
A U.S. permanent presence in Poland
will provide U.S. allies on NATO’s Eastern flank with increased security and
strengthen transatlantic security. Additionally, it will underscore U.S.
commitment to maintain peace and security in Eastern and Central Europe and
serve as a deterrence against Russia, which has shown its increasing propensity
for violating international norms by invading Georgia and Ukraine."
From this document, we can see
that Poland is extremely anxious to see NATO and, in particular, the
United States expand its presence in Eastern Europe in a desperate effort to
fend off a future Russian invasion. While the drums of war may not yet be
beating, the drummer is certainly sitting on his stool, drumsticks in hand and the American military-industrial complex is just waiting for the music to start.
No comments:
Post a Comment