Canada's
Parliamentary Budget Officer and Stephen Harper's nemesis and a man he wishes
that he had never hired for the job, Kevin Page, has released his
prognostication for Canada's economy in his most recent PBO Economic and Fiscal Outlook (EFO). Here are some of
the highlights of his independent and non-partisan analysis.
The
PBO opens by noting that the global economic outlook has soured since their
June EFO due, in large part, to the ongoing concerns about unsustainable levels
of Eurozone debt. Also playing into the equation is the slowdown in the
United States economy and the downward revisions to previous quarterly growth
figures which show that the 2008 Great Contraction was longer and the rebound
has been weaker than originally thought. Here's a graph showing what
really happened to American economic growth once revisions were considered:
All
of this has led to downward pressure on global commodity prices; this is of
particular concern to Canada's economy which hinges on the production of
commodities. Here is a graph showing how commodity prices have retraced
their steps to just above last year's lows:
When
the PBO takes all of these factors into consideration, they conclude that the
level of nominal GDP will likely be $20 billion lower this year and $48 billion
lower in 2012 what was expected in their May 2011 projection. Here is a
chart showing the growth downgrade:
The
PBO anticipates that real GDP will grow by 2.2 percent in 2011, 1.5 percent in
2012 and 2.1 percent in 2013. The growth in 2011 is 2.5 percent below the
economy's productive capacity and this gap will ultimately lead to higher
unemployment. As well, the PBO is concerned that the high level of
Canadian household debt will restrain growth by a significant amount and
will result in less spending on residential investments. With Canada's
real estate market becoming increasingly frothy-looking, I suspect that a
correction in the housing market could retard Canada's economic growth even
further than the PBO projects.
Mr.
Page goes on to discuss the impact of slower growth on the Federal government's
(pardon me, the Harper government's) fiscal situation. Let's look at the
revenue side of the ledger first. As the economy grows, budget revenues
are expected to outpace growth in nominal GDP for two reasons; first, the
increase in tax revenue based on growth in the economy and second, the increase
in EI premiums from $1.78 per $100 of insurable earnings to $2.28 in 2016. Unfortunately,
this is offset by the reduction in corporate income tax to 16.5 percent in 2011
and 15 percent at the beginning of 2012.
On
the expense side of the ledger, government program expenses are projected to
growth at 2.8 percent annually on average over the next 5 years with direct
program expenditures expected to growth at 1.6 percent annually, well below
growth levels seen in the mid-2000s but higher than what was seen in the second
half of the 1990s as shown on this graph:
Unfortunately
for all of us, public debt charges (interest on the debt) is projected to
increase from $30.9 billion in 2010 - 2011 to $40.7 billion in 2016 - 2017 as
deficit spending adds to the debt and interest rates rise to normal levels. The
only thing saving our bacon right now is the prolonged period of ultra-low
interest rates.
Mr.
Page does note that revenues are anticipated to increase faster than total
expenses including debt charges with deficits falling from $33.4 billion in
2010 - 2011 (2.1 percent of GDP) to $7.3 billion in 2016 - 2017 (0.3 percent of
GDP). Here is a graph showing how he assesses the likelihood of Ottawa
actually balancing its budget over the next 5 years showing that he feels that there is only a 10 percent chance of achieving balance by 2014 - 2015:
The
fly in the ointment for whether or not Ottawa can achieve fiscal balance over
the long term is Canada's aging population. As the coming decades pass,
increasing numbers of Canadian's join the ranks of those who collect both their
public pension and make use of their health care entitlements as shown on the
red bars. The dashed and solid black line shows that there is a massive
decline in the number of Canadians paying into the system at the same time as
more and more Canadians are availing themselves of the nation's pension plan
and health care:
It
is this demographic transition that, over the long term, will make it
increasingly difficult for Canada's federal government to achieve fiscal
balance, in fact, here is a graph showing how Canada's net combined Provincial
and Federal debt will climb exponentially over the next 60 years as a
percentage of GDP:
The
preceding graph brings to mind this particular graph from the United States
Congressional Budget Office which shows the impact of aging on growth in
America's federal spending as a percentage of GDP over just the next 25 years:
The
aging issue will be faced by most of the world's developed and developing
economies, some sooner rather than later, because of a worldwide decline in
birthrates over the past 4 decades. In the case of Canada, the PBO
estimates that permanent policy actions that include tax increases, reduced
spending or a combination of the two amounting to 2.7 percent of GDP (1.5
percent of GDP at the provincial level and 1.2 percent of GDP at the federal
level) would be required to stabilize Canada's net debt-to-GDP ratio at 58
percent of GDP. Delaying this action by 10 years will increase the amount
of corrective action to 3.4 percent of GDP and waiting for 30 years will
require an increase in corrective action to 5.8 percent of GDP.
It will be interesting to see whether Mr. Flaherty shows the
intestinal fortitude required to keep Canada's spending and revenue picture in
balance through tax increases and staff reductions among other things. As
shown here, his prognostications have been far from accurate in the past. With
the Federal Reserve revising down their projections
showing that growth for 2011 has dropped from 2.7 to 2.9 percent to 1.6 to 1.7
percent in just three short months, I'd suggest that the growth projections of both
Mr. Page and Mr. Flaherty may both be well on the optimistic side. This will make it increasingly unlikely that the Conservatives will reach their budgetary targets.
Another great article PJ; and I am glad to see that provincial debt is now being highlighted along with our federal net debt considering it is a material amount on its own!
ReplyDeleteGood informative article. This Canadian ex-pat thanks you. The Federal gov't (sorry, Harper gov't) will have its hands full keeping the economy on an even keel.
ReplyDeleteHappy to keep you up to date
ReplyDeleteGreat post and useful. Want to "follow" in Google+, but can't get you there. Advice how to do so, please.
ReplyDeletebut the politicians and also the community doesn't appear to determine it that way.
ReplyDelete