In
recent weeks, I have posted several articles in this blog looking at the rapid
expansion of the balance sheets of three of the world's major central banks;
the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank. Since
the middle of 2008, all three of these banks have seen rapid increases in their
balance sheets as they've made desperate attempts to stimulate their respective
economies through the purchasing of their local sovereign debt instruments. What
we rarely read about, are the balance sheets of the central banks of the
emerging Asian economies and how the actions of these banks could impact the
economy.
In a
Bank of International Settlements research paper entitled "The expansion of
central bank balance sheets in emerging Asia: what are the risks?" by Andrew Filardo and James
Yetman outlines the growth in the balance sheets of Asia's central banks
because of the huge buildup in foreign reserve assets and the risks associated
with this rise.
First,
let's look at how assets and liabilities are looked at from a central banker's
viewpoint and exactly what a central bank's balance sheet is used for. A
central bank's balance sheet assets consist of foreign and domestic assets
including government bonds, foreign exchange and gold and its liabilities
consist of currency in circulation, bank reserves, central bank securities,
government deposits and equity capital (accumulated profits). Policies
that result in an increase in the size of a central bank's assets by necessity
require a corresponding increase in the bank's liabilities. This is where
problems can occur.
What
does a central bank use its balance sheet for? Historically, central
bankers have used their balance sheets as a lender of last resort. They
can alter the size of their balance sheets to achieve certain economic goals
(either controlling inflation or, as we are now experiencing, stimulating
economic growth) as we have all seen from the recent rather futile actions of
Ben Bernanke and Mervyn King.
Let's
open by looking at two graphs from the report, the first which shows the
increase in the size of the balance sheets for the Fed, the Bank of England,
the ECB and the People's Bank of China (PBOC) since the 2001 reference year and
the second graph which shows the increase in the balance sheets since the
reference year 2001 for Hong Kong (HK), Singapore (SG), Malaysia (MY),
Philippines (PH), Thailand (TH), Indonesia (ID), India (IN) and Korea (KR): :
Most
of the Asian central bank balance sheet growth has been in the form of foreign
exchange reserve assets, some of which is related to the bolstering of reserves
after the 1990s Asian crisis, however, at least some of the growth is
attributed to central banks efforts to keep their local currency from
appreciating. The combined size of the balance sheets of all
aforementioned 9 nations (including China) has risen from $1.1 trillion in 2001
to $6.4 trillion in 2011. In some nations, the central bank balance
sheets are now close to 100 percent of GDP as shown on this graph:
In
general, central bank balance sheets in the Asian region are far larger as a
share of the GDP in these nations than in the more developed economies of the
world as shown on the right.
How
have Asia's central banks behaved differently than those of the developed
nations? In the world's more advanced economies, central banks generally
purchase domestic assets (i.e. government bonds like Treasuries, gilts
etcetera) that results in lower interest rates (i.e. QE and "The
Twist") and is accompanied by an increase in central bank liabilities in
the form of bank reserves. In contrast, Asia's central banks have
intervened heavily in foreign exchange markets and have accumulated massive
foreign reserve assets as shown on this graph:
Every
action by central bankers results in an economic reaction, some of which are
totally unanticipated. What are the risks to the economy associated with
the increased size of Asia's central bank balance sheets?
1.) Inflation: Rapid expansion of central
bank balance sheets is generally associated with higher inflation. Most
experts agree that it is not the size of the balance sheet that matters,
rather, it is the speed at which the balance sheet expands. A high rate
of expansion can result in inflation when the financial system cannot absorb
the expansion of the bank's monetary liabilities. Fortunately, in the
case of Asia's central banks, the expansion of their balance sheets does not
appear to pose an inflationary risk at this point in time, however, history is
not on their side since there are numerous examples where strong growth of
central bank liabilities is associated with higher increases in prices.
2.) Financial
Instability: The
accumulation of foreign reserves can lead to the crowding out of domestic
lending. A study of the balance sheets of private Asian banks between
2003 and 2007 suggests that a 1 percent increase in central bank foreign
exchange reserves led to a 1.3 percent decline in the rate of growth of total
loans made by the private banks. On the other hand, a persistent
expansion of central bank foreign exchange assets held on deposit at central
banks on behalf of the private banking sector can result in a glut of very
low-yielding, no risk assets on the books of the private banks. Many
banks will continue to hold these low-yielding assets as long as there is risk
in the economy, however, when it appears that an economy is about to enter a
growth phase, the private sector banks will look to sell these assets in a
search for higher yielding investment. This could lead to overly
exuberant and unsustainable lending practices.
3.) Financial
Market Distortions:
When an emerging market central bank finances its accumulation of foreign
exchange assets with thinly traded local currencies, it can quite quickly
become the dominant player in a given market. This can lead to the market
responding to moves made by the central bank rather than responding to economic
reality. Central bank actions can, in this case, distort interest rates
from what they would normally be in the open market (take note Mr. Bernanke et
al).
Central
banks are also running the risk of large financial losses that grow along with
the size of their balance sheets. Here are three risks to central banks
associated with expanding of their balance sheets:
1.)
Central banks normally get a lower rate of return on their foreign assets than
the cost of financing these assets; this means that the asset may well be
yielding less than the cost of issuing central bank paper and the interest rate
paid on excess private bank reserves.
2.)
The central bank may incur losses on its foreign portfolio when the domestic
currency appreciates against the foreign currency.
3.)
The central bank may face a mark-to-market loss when interest rates rise,
pushing the value of the asset down (since interest rates and asset (bond) prices
operate in opposition). As well, the central bank may face additional
losses if the asset issuer defaults.
In
conclusion, the rapid growth in Asia's central bank balance sheets is
concerning since the ramifications of such actions are neither fully understood
nor is the response of the world's economy to such actions completely
predictable. According to the authors, the ballooning of central bank
balance sheets "...raises concerns about distortions in financial markets
and implications of central bank losses...", an issue that is rarely
discussed. The world's central banks and their bloated balance sheets are
entering uncharted territory and, "...the risks associated with the size
and structure of central bank balance sheets should not be overlooked."
Romney is in quite a long line...In fact, Just repeat two words again and again: "Guns" and "God;" And there you have IDIOT-AMERICA, voting directly against themselves and their own self-interests, decade after decade. To be fair, The Democrats are worse than useless, tiptoeing around, never wanting to offend potential voters. It['s disgusting. Personally, I'm quite ready to offend Every Stupid-Idiot-Moron in this GODFORSAKEN PIT, America. After all, the IDIOTS truly deserve that at the very least.
ReplyDeleteWhats up with C Marlowe? comment not about article - very well written and clear analysis thanks.
ReplyDeleteThis country had the greatest chance ever had we elected Ron Paul for president in 2008.
ReplyDeleteBut the gop is so corrupt they chose to make sure we got another 4 years of obama.
NEVER FORGET