With Republican members of Congress
appearing to be particularly concerned about spending tax payers nickels and
dimes, I found the recently released analysis from the Congressional Research
Service "Former Presidents: Pensions, Office Allowances and Other
Federal Benefits" by Wendy Ginsberg quite enlightening.
The Former Presidents Act (FPA) was enacted in
1958 to provide former Presidents of the United States with a pension, support
staff, security, office support, travel funds and mailing privileges to
"maintain the dignity" of the Office of the President. Prior to
1958, former Presidents left office with no federal pension or financial assistance.
Due, in large part, to former President Truman's financial difficulties after he left office,
the FPA was enacted by Congress to ensure that former Presidents were not
destitute and an embarrassment to the state. The FPA provides funds to
all former Presidents and their wives to "help him respond to
post-presidency mail and speaking requests, among other informal public
duties". Widows of former Presidents are also entitled to a monetary
allowance of $20,000 annually. Funds are appropriated by the
Administrator of General Services up to $1,000,000 for each former President
and $500,000 for the spouse of each former President each fiscal year for
security and travel related expenses.
In its original form, the FPA
granted former Presidents an annual pension that is equal to the pay received
by the head of an executive department which is $201,700 in 2014. In
January 2013, the Presidential Allowance Modernization Act (H.R. 248)
was introduced; this bill seeks to limit the pensions received by former
Presidents to $200,000 annually and remove other benefits provided for travel,
staff and office expenses. As well, for every dollar that a President
earns in excess of $400,000 annually, his annual pension would be reduced by
$1. As you will see later, this is a very interesting change to the system given the earning power of today's former Presidents. In addition, according to H.R. 248, if a former President holds an elected position in the
federal government, he would not be able to collect his pension until he left
elected office. This bill was referred to the House Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform on January 15, 2013 where it languishes.
On January 10, 2013, President Obama
signed into law the Former Presidents Protection Act of 2012 (H.R.
6620) which extends lifetime Secret Service protection to all former Presidents
and their children. Before the bill was enacted, President George W. Bush
would have been the first former POTUS to have his post-Presidency Secret Service
security limited to 10 years after he left office, changes to the system that were put in
place in 1994 for all Presidents who entered office after January 1, 1997.
Oddly enough, in a Congress that is besought by partisan bickering, H.R.
6620 was introduced on November 30, 2012, passed the House on December 5, 2012,
the Senate on December 28, 2012 and was promptly signed into law. Note
that the Secret Service does not disclose the cost of protecting the former
First Families.
Now, let's get to the bottom line. For
fiscal 2014, Congress appropriated $3,551,00 for former Presidents, down 3.1
percent from the $3,663,000 appropriated for fiscal 2013. Here is a chart
breaking down the 2014 appropriations (in thousands of dollars) for the four
retired Presidents that are still living:
Here are the total appropriations
for all former Presidents that have been the beneficiaries of the FPA since the
year 2000:
In total, since 2000, the pensions
and benefits for the former Presidents of the United States and their widows
have cost $60.053 million.
Here's what the costs for each of
the former Presidents look like in terms of 2013 dollars:
Despite the general trend of
increasing costs, when adjusted for inflation, the value of each former
President's pensions and benefits has remained stable or declined
When President's leave office, they
are entitled to "transitional expenses" that pay for the costs of
winding up the affairs of their office for a period of up to seven months.
In fiscal 2009, President George W. Bush requested $8,520,000 for
transition expenses to support transition costs for the President, Vice
President, President-elect and Vice President-elect. In anticipation of
the 2012 election, President Obama's fiscal 2013 budget requested $8.9 million for
possible transition expenses.
One issue that is of concern is the
cost of renting office space for former Presidents as shown on this chart:
The author of the report suggests
that one option to control rental costs would be to cap the size of the office
and that the office be located in a federal building.
During the debate on
the Former Presidents Act in 1958, Representative Joseph Martin made this comment:
“Mr. Speaker, let me say to the distinguished Speaker that
I favor the adoption of the conference report because I believe it is necessary
to accept the report to have legislation that I believe is just and desirable.
I believe all Government employees are entitled to a pension, regardless of
their offices. It has been my experience to know personally 8 Presidents of the
United States. 4 of them rather intimately. I know the tremendous burden that
is thrust upon their shoulders in this high office. I know the very exacting demands
of the office. I think any man who has served as President of the United States,
no matter what his political faith, is entitled to be assured of a retirement
revenue at the close of his service.
Mr. Speaker, reference has been made to Mr. Hoover. Mr.
Hoover does not need this pension. He does not need any of the emoluments that
go with the legislation. He is big enough to appreciate and say that there may
be men coming along who will need this. We should not force them to write and
lecture to gain a livelihood in their final days. I do not believe that we
should be niggardly. We must not make it so that only men of great wealth can
serve as President.”
Little did Representative Martin know how substantial the earning power of a former President would be fifty years later!
All of the currently
living former Presidents are making a very lucrative living based on
their service to the United States. Fortunately, we have a snapshot of
what former Presidents are capable of earning thanks to Hillary Clinton.
According to Hillary Clinton's financial disclosures from 2012, we know that former President Bill
Clinton earned honorariums ranging from $150,000 to $700,000 for each of
the 73 speeches that he gave during the 12 month period to wide-ranging
business and philanthropic audiences. He also has published
several books as has George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter.
According to the Center for Public Integrity, George W. Bush's
speaking fees of between $100,000 and $150,000 per speech have earned
him about $15 million for the 140 paid talks that he gave by mid-2011. This is
on top of his estimated net worth of between $6.5 million and $20 million.
In light of
the aforementioned information, perhaps a complete review of the Former Presidents Act is
warranted. After all, it's not as though any of the currently living
former Presidents are having difficulty putting food on the table. While
the costs to American taxpayers of keeping retired Presidents out of the
poorhouse are not overly onerous compared to President Obama's 2015 budget, the
message being sent is not a particularly easy one to digest, particularly given
that some members of Congress are kicking up a fuss over spending a few million
dollars on child care subsidies.
Mommas in America were discouraged in a song many years ago from letting their children grow up to be cowboys, it appears to have been a reasonable decision. Today after viewing the lifestyles associated with many career paths, politics and the route of so called "public service" seems to offer much potential.
ReplyDeleteA career in politics can grant you a lifestyle where you, and oftentimes your family will get to rub elbows with the ultra wealthy and the country's most powerful titans of business and industry. This career choice also has the benefit of sheltering you, and extending legal protection that covers you from the responsibilities of your actions. Flying about in private planes politicians are rewarded with generous pensions and superior healthcare benefits far outside the reach of the average citizen. More on this subject below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/01/encourage-your-children-to-become...