Updated July 2015
In the mainstream media, those who contribute to the financial pages are starting to publish stories expressing concerns about the relatively lofty valuations in the stock market. One measure that gets very little attention is the ratio of the market value of United States companies to the U.S. gross national product (GNP), a measure that is also known as the Buffett Indicator. Ted Berg, an analyst at the Treasury's Office of Financial Research cites the current level of this ratio as cause for concern in a recent publication entitled Quicksilver Markets.
In the mainstream media, those who contribute to the financial pages are starting to publish stories expressing concerns about the relatively lofty valuations in the stock market. One measure that gets very little attention is the ratio of the market value of United States companies to the U.S. gross national product (GNP), a measure that is also known as the Buffett Indicator. Ted Berg, an analyst at the Treasury's Office of Financial Research cites the current level of this ratio as cause for concern in a recent publication entitled Quicksilver Markets.
The author begins by
comparing this bull market to historical bull markets as shown on this graphic:
Here is a chart showing
what has happened to the market since the beginning of 2006:
The author notes that
from the peak in October 2007 to the trough in March 2009, the stock market
lost 57 percent of its value. Since then, the S&P 500 has risen from
677 to its current level of around 2080, a gain of 207 percent. As well,
he notes that the current bull market reached an important milestone in March
2015; it hit its sixth anniversary. At 72 months, this upturn has lasted
significantly longer than all but 3 advancing markets since the Great Depression.
Now, let's look at one of
the author's fundamental valuation metrics, the aforementioned Buffet Indicator
which measures the ratio of corporate market value to gross national product.
This indicator is informally termed the Buffett Indicator because it is
reportedly Warren Buffet's preferred measure for assessing overall stock market
valuation.
Let's start by looking at
what has happened to the market value of U.S. companies since 1949. Here is a graph from FRED showing the total stock
market value of all non-financial American companies:
At $22.443 trillion, the
stock market value of U.S. corporations is at an all-time high and has risen 37.4 percent above its previous pre-Great Recession high of $16.336 trillion.
Here is a graph from FRED showing the gross national
product since 1947:
At $17.827 trillion at
the end of 2014, the nation's GNP is just below its all-time high of $17.896
trillion.
Now, let's use both
graphs to give us the ratio of the total market value of Corporate America to
gross national product also known as the Buffett Ratio:
Over the 63 years from
the fourth quarter of 1951 to the fourth quarter of 2014, the arithmetic mean
Buffett Ratio was 68.55 and the median value was 65.22. Values ranged
from a low of 31.83 in mid-1982 to a high of 153.14 at the beginning of 2000.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Buffet Ratio was 125.89, its highest
level since it rose to 153.14 during the technology sector bubble in the first
quarter of 2000 as noted above. At present, the Buffett Ratio is 83.6
percent above the arithmetic mean and 93.0 percent above the median. As
shown on this graphic, the Buffett Ratio is now just below two standard
deviations above the average, an event that has only occurred twice in the past
45 years:
We all know how those two stories ended, don't we? It took years for equity prices to recover to
pre-correction levels. We also have to keep in mind that at least some of
the boost in equity prices has been created by the Federal Reserve's massive
injection of liquidity into the economy since 2008. All of that
"money" has to go some place and there are at least two other asset
classes that have benefitted from the Fed's munificence; bonds and the housing
market.
Ted Berg concludes by
noting that systemic crises are proceeded by bubbles and that four factors
accelerate the emergence of asset bubbles:
1.) expansive monetary
policies.
2.) lending booms.
3.) foreign capital
inflows.
4.) financial
deregulation.
I think that we can see
that all four factors have been in play for at least the last decade and that
the current stock market valuations are in bubble territory. This should
not be particularly surprising given the Federal Reserve's long-term experimental
monetary policy that has led Corporate America to pile on ever-increasing debt
as shown on this graph:
Once the economy slows,
it will quickly become apparent just how much of a bubble has been created by
the current massive expansion in the monetary base, money that found a home in
the U.S. stock market.
Yes, once prices have collapsed, if they do, it will be apparent that there was a bubble. Bubble means collapsible prices. What good is it to know that? This bubble talk is all retrospective. If there is no price collapse, then there was no bubble.
ReplyDeleteWords like stagflation and slow growth may be the cornerstone of the global economy for years to come. As I have written before, currencies are the "Trojan Horse" of governments, and a weapon that will be used to fleece the average citizen out of his wealth. To think those in charge of our central banks and economies have the wisdom to guide us on the path to prosperity is a bit naive.
ReplyDeleteKnowing that many of those leading us honed their skills in the noncompetitive ivory towers of academia rather than in the arena of commerce should give us pause. Even before you factor in things like hidden agendas and arrogance it would not be wise to follow them blindly. The article below explores this subject.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2015/06/stagflation-and-slow-growth.html