You couldn't write a
believable script for what has happened during the 2016 presidential election
cycle, particularly now that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has, for the
second time, decided to recommend that no charges be pressed against the
Democrat's choice for president. While the scandal over the Clinton
private server has consumed more "paper" than it's really worth, the
real late campaign issue has been the steady release of emails from the
computer of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's right hand man and a stalwart
supporter of all things Clinton (except, perhaps, for Chelsea) and who is to blame for this unexpected invasion of privacy.
While Ms. Clinton loves
to place the blame for the release of John Podesta's insider emails, which
clearly show how the Clinton camp functions, on the Russians, according to the
man who should know, the Russians had absolutely nothing to do with the release
of what should be very damning information for the Clinton campaign and the
family charitable foundation. In that light, I would highly recommend
that my readers (and anyone else that they are in contact with), watch the following
interview with Julian Assange who is exchanging his thoughts with
the renowned journalist, John Pilger, an Australian journalist who
reported extensively on the war in Vietnam and who just happened to be in the
same room as Robert Kennedy when he was assassinated in 1968. Here is the
video interview in its entirety:
As an aside, in searching for the
interview on Google, it is interesting to see how little covered it was by the
American mainstream media. A search using the terms "John Pilger,
Julian Assange and interview" yielded a stunningly small 40 results with
some of them being duplicates of others. Not a single one of the
mainstream media outlets in the United States was included in the results of
this search, suggesting that they are deliberately choosing to ignore this
interview because it plays against their candidate of choice, Hillary Clinton.
Thanks to John Pilger's transcript of the interview
at Consortiumnews, I can provide you with a few of the key quotes from Julian
Assange. Please note that all bolds are mine and that the comment about the Deep State is also mine:
"John Pilger: What’s
the significance of the FBI’s intervention in these last days of the U.S.
election campaign, in the case against Hillary Clinton?
Julian
Assange: If you look at the history of the FBI, it has become
effectively America’s political police. The FBI demonstrated this by taking
down the former head of the CIA [General David Petraeus] over classified
information given to his mistress. Almost no one is untouchable. The FBI is
always trying to demonstrate that no one can resist us. But Hillary Clinton very
conspicuously resisted the FBI’s investigation, so there’s anger within the FBI
because it made the FBI look weak. We’ve published about 33,000 of Clinton’s
emails when she was Secretary of State. They come from a batch of just over
60,000 emails, [of which] Clinton has kept about half – 30,000 — to herself,
and we’ve published about half. Then there are the Podesta emails we’ve been
publishing. [John] Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign manager, so
there’s a thread that runs through all these emails; there are quite a lot of
pay-for-play, as they call it, giving access in exchange for money to states,
individuals and corporations. [These emails are] combined with the cover-up of
the Hillary Clinton emails when she was Secretary of State, [which] has led to
an environment where the pressure on the FBI increases.
John
Pilger: The Clinton campaign has said that Russia is behind all of
this, that Russia has manipulated the campaign and is the source for WikiLeaks
and its emails.
Julian
Assange: The Clinton camp has been able to project that kind of
neo-McCarthy hysteria: that Russia is responsible for everything. Hilary
Clinton stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had
assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That is false; we can
say that the Russian government is not the source.
WikiLeaks
has been publishing for ten years, and in those ten years, we have published
ten million documents, several thousand individual publications, several
thousand different sources, and we have never got it wrong...
Julian
Assange: I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person
because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions, tormented
literally to the point where they become sick; they faint as a result of [the
reaction] to their ambitions. She represents a whole network of people and a
network of relationships with particular states. The question is how does
Hilary Clinton fit in this broader network? She’s a centralizing cog. You’ve
got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman Sachs
and major elements of Wall Street, and Intelligence and people in the State
Department and the Saudis. (i.e the Deep State)
She’s the
centralizer that inter-connects all these different cogs. She’s the smooth
central representation of all that, and ‘all that’ is more or less what is in
power now in the United States (once again, the Deep State). It’s what we call the establishment or the DC
consensus. One of the more significant Podesta emails that we released was about
how the Obama cabinet was formed and how half the Obama cabinet was basically
nominated by a representative from Citibank. This is quite amazing.
Julian
Assange: Libya, more than anyone else’s war, was Hillary Clinton’s
war. Barak Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person championing it?
Hillary Clinton. That’s documented throughout her emails. She had put her
favored agent, Sidney Blumenthal, on to that; there’s more than 1,700 emails
out of the 33,000 Hillary Clinton emails that we’ve published, just about
Libya. It’s not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of
Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state — something that she would use in
her run-up to the general election for President.
So in late
2011 there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock that was produced
for Hillary Clinton, and it’s the chronological description of how she was the
central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state, which resulted in around
40,000 deaths within Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the
European refugee and migrant crisis.
Not only
did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the destabilization of
other African countries as a result of arms flows, but the Libyan state itself
was no longer able to control the movement of people through it. Libya faces
along to the Mediterranean and had been effectively the cork in the bottle of
Africa. So all problems, economic problems and civil war in Africa — previously
people fleeing those problems didn’t end up in Europe because Libya policed the
Mediterranean. That was said explicitly at the time, back in early 2011 by
Gaddafi: ‘What do these Europeans think they’re doing, trying to bomb and
destroy the Libyan State? There’s going to be floods of migrants out of Africa
and jihadists into Europe,’ and this is exactly what happened."
I think
that's enough for this posting. I would urge you to watch this important
video before you cast your vote in this election. With only one current
superpower, what happens in America largely dictates what happens to the rest
of the world. We need you to make the right decision.
Thanks for making the Assange interview available. It seems nothing has or is really changing and much of the world is caught between a rock and a hard place.Thanks to information leaked by Edward Snowden we know the "black budget" is big, a massive 52 billion dollars. This is the money used in "secret" spy operations, and it is enough to send shivers down the back of those that cherish privacy.
ReplyDeleteThis is beginning to look like the society we have read about the totalitarian society of Oceania described in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. In Orwell's novel, all citizens of Oceania are monitored by cameras and are fed fabricated news stories by the government. More on this subject in the article below titled, "Are We Creating An Orwellian Society?"
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/09/are-we-creating-orwellian-society.html