With the Trump wall
coming up for discussion on a fairly regular basis and with Donald Trump's
rather fluid estimates of the cost of the wall, a brief by Konstantin Kakaes in the MIT
Technology Review breaks down the numbers for us. For the purposes of the
brief, the author assumes a wall length of 1000 miles with natural barriers
such as mountains blocking cross-border traffic in some regions and the existing
border fencing providing security for the remainder of the 1989 mile-long
international border.
First, here is a map
showing the proposed route of the wall:
Here is map showing the existing portion of
the border barrier system:
There is already 653
miles of existing fencing along the border which has cost $2.3 billion in
construction costs since 2006 with the first fence being constructed back in
1990; some of this "wall" looks like these photos:
About half of the 653
miles of existing fencing is designed to stop vehicular traffic with most of
the rest designed to stop foot traffic. In total, there are 48 controlled U.S. - Mexico border crossings with 330
ports of entry. As you can see from the photo above, much of the fence
would provide very little impediment for an immigrant.
If a concrete wall
were to be built as Donald Trump has suggested, it would be constructed using
concrete reinforced with steel rebar; the author suggests that a wall between
35 and 65 feet in height would be required, recommending an average height of
50 feet with a foundation that extends 15 feet underground for both stability
and to deter cross-border tunnelling with a one foot thickness to reduce the
risk of boring through the wall. To put this into perspective, the
relatively short sections of existing concrete wall that separates Israel from
Palestine is up to 26 feet in height and looks like this:
A wall of the dimensions proposed by the author would use 12.7 million cubic metres of structural concrete (average cost $900
per cubic metre) and 2.3 billion kilograms of rebar (average cost $2 per kilogram).
In addition, there would be labor costs for construction which are likely
to be high given the ruggedness and remoteness of some of the terrain, however, for the sake of this
estimation, the author uses the same labor costs as what went into building the
border fences between 2006 and 2009 as noted above.
Here is a cost summary
for 1000 miles of concrete wall:
Concrete - $8.73 billion
Rebar - $4.6 billion
Labor - $2.3 billion
TOTAL - $15.63 billion
According to the author,
the total cost of megascale projects in the United States is generally two to
three times the material costs. In this case, the material costs total
$13.33 billion; this results in total costs ranging between $26.7 billion and
$39.9 billion. And, as we know, governments rarely spend less than
projected on major construction projects. It is also important to
remember that much of the existing barrier is an easily breached fence meaning
that well more than 1000 miles may be required to ensure security.
In this era of a $20
trillion debt, America's taxpayers will have to decide whether the added
security is worth the cost.
it took over 30 minutes to dig out the remains of the victim from the rubble.But the four survivors, it was gathered, escaped death by the whisker, as they were not completely covered by mud when the fence caved in.
ReplyDeletegalvanized fence