Recent
testimony by Defense
Secretary James Mattis before the Senate Armed Services Committee provides us
with an interesting glimpse into what lies ahead in Afghanistan. This
conflict which began on October 7, 2001, within a month of the September 11th,
2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, has ground on for nearly
16 years and the nation is still no safer for its people and no less
politically unstable than it was in 2001. While the American-led combat
mission officially ended on December 28, 2014, making this the longest war
fought in U.S. history, as you will see in this posting, the cost of the war
continues to mount.
Let's
look at some statistics first. Here is a table showing the coalition
military fatalities linked to Operation Enduring Freedom:
Here
is a table showing the number of deaths of U.S. military personnel:
Here
is a table showing the number of deaths related to the use of improvised
explosive devices (IEDs):
Here is a bar graph showing the number of
civilians killed in the Afghani hostilities up to 2015:
It
is estimated that more than 31,000 civilians were killed in direct violence
since the October 7, 2001 invasion.
Here
is a graphic showing the patterns of civilian killings in Afghanistan between
2009 and 2015:
Here
is a graphic showing both the number of Afghani civilians killed and injured
from 2009 to 2015:
According
to the Watson Institute, the cumulative total spent (in current dollars)
on the Afghanistan war from fiscal 2001 to 2016 reached $783
billion. Here is a graphic showing the annual appropriations for each
of the U.S. war operations:
In
addition, the Obama Administration admitted in mid-2016 that its plan to reduce
the number of troops in Afghanistan would be delayed; as a result, they
requested more than $44 billion for the operations in the Afghanistan theatre
for fiscal 2017. As well, more than $117 billion has been allocated to
reconstruction projects throughout the nation according to SIGAR.
With
that background, let's look at Defense Secretary Mattis' most recent comments
on Afghanistan. He requested $64.6 billion for Overseas Contingency
Operations which includes operations in Afghanistan, Iran and Syria with the
goal of "increasing efforts to sustain NATO's defences to deter aggression
and global counterterrorism operations. He states that it is necessary
for the United States to "sustain the international presence in
Afghanistan to help stabilize the South Asia region and deny terrorists a safe
haven." According
to Reuters, he also remarked that the United States was "not
winning" the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan as shown here:
Here
is his justification for these expenditures:
"More
broadly, this need to preserve our security also requires us to sustain the
international presence in Afghanistan to help stabilize the South Asia region
and deny terrorists a safe haven. Instability in the Middle East spills
over into other regions. Extremists and extremist ideologies have spread to
Europe, Africa, and Asia. Numerous countries are dealing with forced migration
of people seeking to escape violence and despair, reminding us that problems originating in
ungoverned or combat torn areas don’t remain there. The United States is
engaged in the Middle East to help restore order and give the people who live
there a more hopeful future, building a better security situation for Americans
who want a safer and more prosperous world for our future."
Again,
according to SIGAR, the period between January and October 2016 saw armed
clashes between Afghani security forces and the Taliban rise by 22 percent over
the same period a year earlier and actually reached their highest level since
United Nations reporting began in 2007. Here is a
graphic showing the number of
reported security incidents per day between November 2012 and November 2016:
Secretary
Mattis also told Congress that by mid-July, he would have a strategy for
combating the Taliban, a plan that many experts predict will include the
addition of thousands of troops to the roughly 9000 that are still in-country,
particularly given the nation's declining security status. Currently, the
fight between the coalition and the Taliban is at a stalemate and, in fact,
once again, the Afghanis are losing as shown here:
According
to mainstream media sources, the bombing which took place in a secured
diplomatic area of Kabul killed at least 90 people and wounded more than 460.
In case you still aren't convinced that the Afghanistan war has been a complete loss, here is a graphic showing the number of
deaths in Afghanistan due to terrorist attacks on an annual basis between 2009
and 2015:
It
would be nice to think that we learned lessons from the failed Soviet
occupation of the 1980s but, apparently, Afghanistan is the war that keeps on
taking and taking and taking.....
No comments:
Post a Comment