There
is one U.S. government agency organization that you are unlikely aware of that
is playing a key roll in this time of so-called fake news; the Broadcasting
Board of Governors or BBG. This entity is an independent agency of the
United States government and is funded by American taxpayers with this
mission:
"...to
inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and
democracy."
BBG
was formed in April of 1994 when President Bill Clinton signed the
International Broadcasting Act. This Act created the International
Broadcasting Bureau, bringing together the five civilian broadcast networks
that the government has operated for decades:
1.)
Voice of America (VOA) which began broadcasting in February 1942. Its
guiding principles are as follows:
a) VOA will
serve as a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news. VOA news
will be accurate, objective, and comprehensive.
b) VOA will
represent America, not any single segment of American society, and will
therefore present a balanced and comprehensive projection of significant
American thought and institutions.
c) VOA will
present the policies of the United States clearly and effectively, and will
also present responsible discussions and opinion on these policies.
2.)
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) which began broadcasting in July 1950.
Its mission is to promote democratic values and institutions by reporting
the news in countries where a free press is banned by the government or not
fully established.
3.)
Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) which began broadcasting in 1985 as Radio
Marti and in 1990 as TV Marti. Its mission is to promote freedom and
democracy by providing the people of Cuba with objective news and information
programming.
4.)
Radio Free Asia (RFA) which began broadcasting in March 1996. Its mission
is to provide accurate and timely news and information to Asian nations where
governments prohibit access to a free press.
5.) Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN) which began broadcasting on its Arabic
language stations Alhurra Television and Radio Sawa in 2004. Its mission
is to provide objective, accurate, and relevant news and information to the
people of the Middle East about the region, the world, and the United States.
MBN supports democratic values by expanding the spectrum of ideas, opinions,
and perspectives available in the region’s media.
The
International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB) was governed by the Broadcasting Board
of Governors or BBG which had oversight authority over all international
non-military government broadcasting. Under the Foreign Affairs Reform
and Restructuring Act of 1998, on October 1, 1999, BBG became an independent,
autonomous entity that was responsible for all U.S. government and
government-sponsored non-military international broadcasting. In its own words, BBG serves
as "a firewall between U.S. government policymakers and journalists".
The Board is composed of nine members who are experts in the fields of
mass communications, broadcast media or international affairs; eight of the
members are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate with the
ninth member being appointed by the Secretary of State and serving ex officio.
Here are the current members of the Board:
It
is interesting to see that current Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, is the
ninth member of the board, following the lead of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Jon
Forbes Kerry. Other than those three Secretaries of State, no other
Secretary of State has actually served on the board. Apparently, it's a good idea to keep propaganda within the confines of the Washington "family".
Here is BBG's current Chief Executive
Officer:
Now,
let's look at BBG's Fiscal Year 2018 Congressional Budget Justification.
Here is a table showing a snapshot of their budget requests for fiscal
2016, 2017 and their request for fiscal 2018:
At just under $685 million, the
request for fiscal 2018 is 8.4 percent lower than it was in fiscal 2017. Note that the budget for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America combined is just under $300 million; please keep this number in mind when you read the next section of this blog. BBG claims that it provides content in 61 languages to 278 million people
in 100 nations around the world. BBG has 400 employees, 1500 string
reporters and 50 news bureaus and its "...extensive network of
seasoned, well-respected and well- connected journalists is particularly strong
in regions where the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Russia, Iran,
China, and other global actors that do not share American values are attempting
to make further inroads."
In
the Executive Summary of the 2018 Congressional Budget Justification, we find
this quote:
"Although
the funding request represents an 8.4 percent reduction from the FY 2017
annualized CR level, the Administration has prioritized funding for countering
Russian misinformation, combatting violent extremism, and enhancing programming
for North Korean audiences in this request."
Obviously,
following Washington's lead, BBG is targeting so-called Russian
misinformation as part of its mission for fiscal 2018. How will it
accomplish this goal?
1.)
through its Russian Service Radio operation, Russian Svoboda (part of
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty).
Here's
what RFE/RL did in 2017:
"The
Current Time (a Russian-language news network that is available to 10 million
households in 12 nations as well as through live streaming on FilmOn.tv and
MeGoGo) digital team’s social media videos on news and current affairs issues,
a new product for RFE/RL’s broadcast region, were viewed more than 125 million
times in the first six months of FY 2017 on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and
Russian social networks. Last year, one video about Russian President Vladimir
Putin’s unfulfilled election promises of five years ago became the top trending
video on the popular Odnoklassniki social network, receiving more than 5.4
million views across social networks."
2.)
through the February 2017 launching of Current Time, a Russian-language
news network that aims to counter Russian false news
and misinformation throughout Europe and in Russia as shown here:
3.)
using VOA Russian to confront Russian disinformation/proganda by focussing
on factual information and alternatives.
In
one example, VOA opened a Silicon Valley news bureau
to cover the ongoing U.S. contributions to the world technology and innovation
revolution, one story profiled a Russian-born entrepreneur who told of “the
surprising kindness and support of total strangers” in Silicon Valley and of
the “stark difference” between America and the environment he left in Russia.
Here
is a quote from the document showing how VOA countered Russian propaganda:
"VOA
expanded television and digital programming from the United States in a daily
one-hour Current Time America TV newscast for Russia and the former Soviet
Union. The broadcasts, in partnership with RFE/RL, were complemented by a
robust digital component that engages and connects with global audiences via
social media and other platforms, including Briefing, a daily digest that looks
at Russian misreporting about America; Russians in America, a TV documentary
series highlighting the lives of everyday Russian immigrants to the U.S.; and
Polygraph.info, a
VOA and
RFE/RL fact-checking website that separates fact from fiction, adds context and
debunks lies. In Eurasia, VOA expanded the number of affiliates it serves with
U.S. news to more than 200, to counter Russia’s increased penetration of the
Balkans. VOA’s Albanian, Bosnian, Macedonian, Serbian, and Ukrainian services
expanded their reporting across broadcast and digital platforms with a
particular focus on providing fact- based alternatives, including a hard-
hitting documentary series produced by VOA Serbian about the Kremlin’s influence
in the country.
In
2018, VOA's Russian Service will premiere additional Current Time programming
to hold discussions with ordinary Americans with roots in Russia about their
lives and experiences in the United States."
Remember that the budget total for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America totalled $300 million? That gives you some idea of how much Washington is willing to spend to counter Russia's "disinformation program".
Remember that the budget total for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America totalled $300 million? That gives you some idea of how much Washington is willing to spend to counter Russia's "disinformation program".
I
think that's enough information to give you a sense of how serious the United
States government is about countering Russian propaganda in fiscal 2018.
Let's close with this quote from the 2018 Congressional Budget
Justification:
"In
a difficult, even hostile, global political and media environment, support for
U.S. international broadcasting is a critical component of American power,
security, and prosperity. Consistent with America’s commitment to free speech
and free expression, the BBG’s networks advance U.S. national interests by
providing audiences in closed societies, or where free media is not yet fully
established, with consistently accurate and compelling journalism and other
content that opens minds and stimulates debate. BBG’s networks demonstrate to
the world the values that reflect American society: freedom, openness, and
democracy. Societies that embrace these values support U.S. interests because
they enjoy greater stability and prosperity, engage more peacefully with their
neighbors, more forcefully reject terrorism and extremism, and make better
political allies and trade partners for the United States."
Interestingly,
from personal experience, in Russia, there are absolutely no restrictions on
access to news sites from around the world so Russia can hardly be described as
a "closed society" with a "free media that is not yet fully
established".
As
you can see from the information that you have read in this posting and given
that BBG is extremely closely tied to the U.S. government (in fact, a banner at
the top of every BBG webpage looks like this...
...how
can anyone believe that Washington is not involved in propagandizing the world
with its own version of democracy and freedom. Most obviously, truth is
in the eye of the beholder and, as governments have long known, this is
particularly applicable to state-controlled propaganda. All we need to do is look at the example of Joseph
Goebels to see how well propaganda worked on convincing a nation of one version
of the "truth".
There's a reason there are no other comments. This posting is a joke. I know the inner workings of BBG, and this blogger doesn't have a clue.
ReplyDeleteThere are many possible reasons for the number of comments. If you really know the "inner workings" of BBG, then please show respect for your readers and explain briefly exactly why you allege this obviously interesting article is a "joke" and why we should believe your claim to have such work experience. Thank you.
DeleteAll of this posting was sourced from information available to the public on BBG's website. Please point out where my posting is a "joke" and I'll be happy to correct any errors.
Delete