Showing posts with label House of Representatives. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House of Representatives. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

The Personal Wealth of Congress

When it comes to a wealth-divided America, Congress is no different.  A yearly report from the Center for Responsive Politics looks at the 534 Members of the House and Senate and assesses each members' net worth and assesses the concentration of wealth for 2014.  The data used by CRP is gleaned from the financial disclosure forms filed by all Members of Congress in May 2014 which report their assets for the year ending December 31, 2013.  Here are some of the more interesting statistics:

1.) The median wealth for a Member of Congress in 2014 was $1.1 million.  This is significantly higher than the median wealth of $56,355 for an American family unit (2013 data).  Here is a graph that shows how the median wealth for a Member of Congress has risen from around $800,000 in 2007 to its current level:


By way of comparison, the median net worth of an American family unit declined by one-third between 2007 and 2013.  Over that same time period, the net worth of a Senator rose from $2.3 million to $2.8 million and the net worth of a member of the House rose from $708,500 to $843,507.

2.) In 2013, the 533 Members of Congress who had filed their financial disclosure forms were worth a total of $4.3 billion, equivalent to the wealth of 76,000 typical American households.  Here is a pie chart that shows the percentage of Congress' total wealth that is controlled by each percentage of members:


The 53 richest Members of Congress owned nearly 80 percent of the estimated wealth held by all members.  This is similar to the 76 percent of national wealth that is owned by the top 10 percent of households.  The top 1 percent of members control $1.442 billion in assets or 32.8 percent of the total.  The next 4 percent of members control $1.375 billion in assets or 31.3 percent of the total.  The next 5 percent of members control $627.1 billion in assets or 14.3 percent of the total.  In sharp contrast, the bottom 40 percent control only $21 million in assets or 0.5 percent of the total. 

3.) Here is a graphic showing the total value of the assets held by the 10 wealthiest Members of Congress and compares the estimated wealth in 2014 to that held in 2013:


Here is a table showing the top 15 wealthiest Members of Congress:


Representative Darrell Issa (R - California) comes in first place among all Members of Congress with an average net worth of $448.4 million.  He was the co-founder and CEO of Directed Electronics, an aftermarket automobile security and convenience product manufacturer.  Here is a graphic showing how his net worth has changed over time and compares it to the average net worth of a House member over the same time frame:


In second place among all members and first place in the Senate, we have Senator Mark Warner (D - Virginia) who had a net worth of $254.2 million in 2014.  He is a former venture capitalist and entrepreneur, founding Columbia Capital  Here is a graphic showing how his net worth has changed over time:


Now, let's look at the other end of the Congressional spectrum.  Representative David Valadao (R - California) has a net worth of negative $25 million thanks to lines of credit that he has used to fund Valadao Dairy, his dairy business in Hanford, California as we can see here:


Interestingly, according to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington or CREW, he was considered to be one of Congress' "Most Corrupt Members" in 2013 as shown here:





An additional 20 Members of Congress showed a negative net worth.  Poor (literally) Senator Debbie Stabenow (D - Michigan) shows a net worth of only $32,500, the funds that she has deposited in her checking account as shown here:


4.) In case you were curious, like many Americans, members of Congress hold at least part of their assets in stocks.  Here is a graphic showing the number of members who hold stocks in some of America's largest companies:


Let's close this posting by looking at the salaries and benefits that are paid to Members of Congress:

Member Salary - $174,000
Speaker of the House - $223,500
President pro tempore of the Senate - $193,400
Majority Leader in both House and Senate  - $193,400
Minority Leader in both House and Senate - $193,400

Members have not received a "pay adjustment" since 2009 when their salaries were increased by 2.8 percent.  Here's a graph showing what has happened to the salaries for members of Congress since 1992 in both constant (inflation-adjusted) and current dollars:

In addition, according to CRS Report RL30064, Members of Congress also have an annual House Allowance  of between $1.299 million and $1.638 million to cover personnel, office expenses including travel costs and official mail.  Senators have a Senate Allowance that ranging from $2.758 million to $4.417 million annually.  Members are also eligible to participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program.  They also have the option to participate in the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System.

It is interesting to see how closely the wealth distribution of the Members of Congress reflect those of the rest of the United States.  A few wealthy people at the top of the heap control the vast majority of the wealth and the the majority of members control a much smaller fraction of the total.  Other than the very obvious differences in both the average and median wealth levels, the wealth distribution sounds pretty much like America, doesn't it?    

Friday, November 13, 2015

Who's Missing? - Voting and Not Voting in Congress

One of the most important responsibilities of being a politician is voting on legislation.  We all know that most politicians vote along party lines, however, if they are not even present to vote, there is absolutely no way that they can represent any segment of those who voted them into office.  Fortunately, ProPublica has tracked the voting records of Members of Congress since 2007 and have developed a tool that enables every voter to see which Members of Congress have  missed the most votes and how many votes their own member has missed.  In this posting, I will provide you with a brief summary of Propublica's findings.

Here's a bit of background for you.  According to Rule III of the Rules of the House of Representatives:

"Every Member shall be present within the Hall of the House during its sittings, unless excused or necessarily prevented, and shall vote on each question put, unless having a direct personal or pecuniary interest in the event of such question."

That is a pretty clear job requirement. 

Let's start by looking at the top ten Members of Congress when it comes to missing votes and the percentage of votes that they have missed:


Let's look at the top three Members when it comes to missing votes.  The number one "vote misser" by a very wide margin is Rep. Bobby L. Rush (D-Illinois) who has been a Member since 1993.  He has missed 1549 votes out of a total of 6906.  Unlike the Senate, it is customary for Members of the House to submit the reasons why they have missed a vote and how they would have voted had they been present; Rep. Rush has elected to do so in only 407 or 26.3 percent of the time.  His most common explanation for missing votes is due to medical matters (344 cases - he had a cancerous salivary gland removed in 2008).  In the current Congress, he ranks tenth in votes missed out of 434 voting Members, making it appear that he a chronic vote misser.

The number two "vote misser" is Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Illinois) who has also been a Member since 1993.  He has missed 1044 votes out of 6902 and has explained his missed vote in only 435 or 41.7 percent of cases.  His most common explanations for missing votes are either ambiguous or no reason given (335 cases) and personal or family matter (68 cases).  He ranks number 6 in votes missed in the current Congress.

The number three "vote misser" is Rep. Ruben Hinojosa (D-Texas) who has been a Member since 1997.  He has missed 874 votes out of 6906 and has explained his missed vote in only 128 or 14.6 percent of cases.  His most common explanations for missing votes are either ambiguous or no reason given (58 cases) or for a personal or family matter (55 cases).  He has the distinction of being in first place when it comes to missing votes in the current Congress.

Now, let's switch gears for a moment and look at the Senate.  Here is a listing of the top ten Senators when it comes to missing votes in 2015, the percentage of votes that they have missed and a history of missed votes going back to 2007:


As we know, four high profile Senators are running for the Republican Presidential nomination.  Let's look at their attendance records:

Obviously, hustling for votes has distracted these four gentlemen from one of their key duties as a Senator.

As I noted above, Members of the House of Representatives have the option to provide a reason for missing a vote.  Overall, only one in six absences are explained but those that do take the time to explain away their missed votes have some interesting excuses.  Here are screen captures showing some of them:

1.) Jeff Landry (R - Louisiana): I lost track of time.


2.) Ben Ray Lujan (D - New Mexico): I couldn't work the House voting machine.


3.) Luis Gutierrez (D - Illinois): I was busy protesting.


4.) Adam Smith (D - Washington): Oops, I hit the wrong button.


If you are interested, you can look up your own Member's voting and excuse record by clicking here.


When you take the time to look at the attendance records and the general lack of personal explanations provided by Members for their absences, it should come as no shock that Congress gets an approval rating in the very, very low double digits as shown on this graphic: