Government Overreach in the Time of COVID-19

Since early 2020, it has become apparent that governments around the world, particularly those of English-speaking nations, have used the COVID-19 "emergency" as an excuse to solidify their power over those that elected them. Apparently, even the invocation of a coronavirus emergency is no longer the "only game in town" when it comes to government overreach, at least for those who live in Colorado.

 

Here is a recent announcement from the Democratic Governor of Colorado, Jared Polis:

 

Here is the Executive Order in full with my highlights on the pertinent sections:

 

This Executive Order gives the Governor the power to take whatever actions he deems necessary "in prevention of, preparation for, response to and recovery from disasters", which, in this case have been expanded to include not only COVID-19 but Respiratory syncytial virus (which the EO admits is common), influenza (which is also common) and other respiratory illnesses.  The Executive Order will expire 30 days from November 11, 2022 (highly unlikely) but can be continued indefinitely with further Executive Orders (highly likely).

 

Coincidentally and somewhat ironically, despite being fully vaccinated, Polis has now tested positive for COVID-19 as shown here:

The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse. 

Edmund Burke

The Surveillance State - Using Technology to Track Your Grocery Purchases

Food has become one of the main stories in both the dinosaur and independent media sources with regular reporting on increasing food prices and decreasing supplies of some key food items.  One issue that has not been covered is how governments could well use technology to track our food purchases.  In this posting, we'll look at one governments latest efforts at unprecedented food surveillance.

 

This announcement recently appeared on the Norwegian government's Statistics Norway portal:

 

 

Here is the introduction:

 

"The assessment describes the need for collection and use of payment transactions via BankAxept from Nets Branch Norway (hereinafter Nets). Data will be used in established official statistics and for the development of new official statistics within the framework of the National Statistics Program 2021-2023.

 

The benefit is related to the fact that BankAxept transactions from Nets can be utilized as a new source in various official statistics that Statistics Norway produces and thus contribute to improving quality and timeliness in the production of statistics. Utilization of BankAxept transactions as a source of more statistics can at the same time help to reduce the workload for those required to do so because data collection becomes more efficient and coordinated. In addition, this will help to reduce Statistics Norway's use of resources related to data collection and processing of data.

 

The costs of collecting payment transactions from Nets are largely related to privacy consequences because some statistical purposes require that transaction data be compared with other personally identifiable information. Statistics Norway will therefore consider how data collection can be minimized, both in the short and long term, as well as implement justifiable privacy protection measures - and data security measures."

 

Norway's Department of Personal and Social Statistics is requiring BankAxept, the Norwegian national payments system which is used in 80 percent of payments to stores, to provide Statistics Norway with all of its customers' transactions with the goal of "contributing to improving quality and timeliness in the production of statistics".  BankAxept was launched in the early 1990s and is owned by Norwegian banks.  It can be used for both physical and digital transactions with payment approval in real time through the use of a mobile telephone, chip and PIN and contactless technology.  The amount of the purchase is immediately debited from the cardholder's account if sufficient funds are available. 

 

In the announcement, the Norwegian government is requesting data containing information on all payment transactions up to and including January 1, 2022 for the entire 2021 calendar year.  The data provided by BankAxept must include the following:

 

1.) Transaction date.

2.) Transaction type status.

3.) Card service.

4.) Organization number of the company where the card was used.

5.) Name of the company where the card was used.

6.) Name of card user, bank account number.

7.) Amount paid for items.

8.) Total amount paid.

Here is the raison d'être for the program:

 

1.) to produce official statistics according to the statistics program, more specifically statistics on consumption in Norwegian households.

2.) new official diet statistics - Statistics Norway is now developing the statistics on behalf of the Norwegian Directorate of Health. The development work is anchored in the letter of intent for a healthier diet , an agreement between the health authorities and the food industry (business organizations, food and beverage producers, the grocery trade and the catering industry)

3.) to study the use of transaction data for the production of other official statistics that use data on turnover and price development of goods and services in the production of statistics. This includes: retail trade and business services, transport and tourism, enterprises and accounting and the use of private health services.

Further, the Norwegian government claims that the main goals of the strategy is...

 

"... to collect, use and share the data for the benefit of society."

  

The Norwegian government states that, until 2012, data on household consumption was collected through sample surveys which led to sampling bias and underreporting which created data quality issues.  This was particularly the case for groceries where the volume of goods sold was very high, leading to a high risk of underreporting.  With this new mandate, Statistics Norway will link each of it citizens' payment transactions to grocery store receipts, allowing them to develop more accurate consumption statistics that are more relevant than those that can be achieved through sample surveys.  Specific grocery item purchases will now be directly linked to persons/households; this will allow the government to analyze socio-economic and regional differences in consumption and link it to income, education, health information and place of residence.

 

Here is another quote:

 

"Statistics Norway will be able to develop new and highly sought-after statistics on developments in the Norwegian diet. The statistics will have a much higher quality and degree of detail than before as a result of the access to transaction data from Nets, combined with e.g. receipt data from the grocery chains, data on nutrient content in the food and household information from Statistics Norway's administrative register. This applies, for example, to statistics that present how the diet of the Norwegian population varies with socio-economic background factors such as income, education and labor market affiliation, and how it varies with demographic and geographical dimensions. It is important to bring out regional, demographic and social differences in diet since this is a key dimension when the population's living habits are to be measured and quantified.

 

In sum, the statistics will contribute to a far better knowledge base on developments in the Norwegian diet with higher quality and level of detail than before. This is also in line with how it is expressed in the health authorities' action plans and in a letter of intent on a healthier diet entered into between the health authorities and the food industry.

 

The statistics must cover transactions throughout the calendar year. The statistics can be published with high relevance, but the starting point is to establish an annual statistic that can gradually be further developed both in terms of publishing content and frequency in close collaboration with the data sources and other partners."

  

Of course, the Norwegian government assures its citizens that the government has strict requirements for information security and any statistic that it releases will be confidential.  Here is a further quote;

 

"In order to address the privacy challenges ..., pseudonymisation of data will be an important measure. Among other things, connections at the personal level will be made with pseudonymous data. In addition, aggregation of data for the individual user location and payee, before further use in, for example, business cycle statistics for the business sector, will be relevant measures for data minimization."

 

To summarize, the Norwegian government has granted itself the right to know exactly what food items enter Norwegians' homes, all in the name of more accurate food consumption statistics.  Of course, this most personal data will remain private...at least until there is a security breach of the system.  While surficially, this appears to be a relatively benign government surveillance program, in fact, it could easily be used for nefarious purposes.  What if governments decide that certain individuals are prohibited from purchasing certain food items or that consumers can only buy a limited amount of certain foods, another form of rationing?  Given that a key part of the Great Reset is a reduction in the amount of meat consumed all in the name of saving Planet Earth from climate change, it really isn't much of a stretch to think that meat could be one of the items that is rationed or forbidden for the organ donor class.  It's also a great way to force consumers to eat foods like weeds, insects and manufactured "meat" as alternative sources of protein given that there is likely to be consumer reluctance to eat these "food items".

 

A question - do you really think that it is any of the government's business what you and your household eat? If there is anything that the past two years have taught us its that today's conspiracy theory is tomorrow's reality.  While Norway is currently on the leading edge of this invasive use of payment technology, you can assure yourself that other governments will follow their lead since all governments seem to be following each other's lead into the establishment of a surveillance state.

The Biderman Chart of Coercion: A Roadmap for Government Coercion During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Back in 1956, Dr. Alfred D. Biderman created a report that was delivered on November 13, 1956 to a combined meeting of the Section on Neurology and Psychiatry with the New York Neurological Society.  The presentation was part of a panel discussion on the Communist Methods of Interrogation and Indoctrination and covers the brainwashing techniques use by the North Koreans and Chinese on captured American pilots.

Here is the title page of what has become known as the Biderman Report which, coincidentally appears on the National Institutes for Health website:

 

Here is a chart (known as the Biderman Chart of Coercion) from the report showing the coercive methods used by the Communists for "eliciting individual compliance":

 

I'm wondering if any of my readers would happen to think that some of these techniques sound familiar?

 

Let's look at each of the techniques in turn and summarize the methods being used by governments around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic:

 

1.) Isolation - social distancing, physical distancing, quarantines at home and in other facilities, semi-isolation from elderly family members, lack of physical contact with loved ones, lack of ability to attend funerals and weddings.

 

2.) Monopolization of Perception - general restriction of all movement, prevent social gatherings including church, meetings, sporting events, concerts, complete control of the mainstream media and its coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

3.) Induced Debilitation/Exhaustion - stay-at-home orders, exercising and socializing is banned, exposed to 24 hour a day, 7 day a week negative media coverage.

  

4.) Threats - threats of fines and or imprisonment for breached emergency order laws, threaten to close businesses, threaten shuttering of all travel, threaten mandatory vaccines, heavy-handed use of police to enforce laws created under Emergency Orders.

 

5.) Occasional Indulgences - some intermittent reopening of stores and restaurants under strict rules including social distancing/capacities, increase the number of people that are allowed to meet in homes, churches, long-term care centres, allow small weddings and funerals.

  

6.) Demonstrating "Omnipotence" and "Omniscience" - force dependency on government handouts because of massive unemployment levels related to shuttering of the economy, develop surveillance techniques to ensure that social distancing and quarantining rules are being adhered to, float trial balloons about the need for a government-mandated Universal Basic Income, use of social media to ensure that only the pro-vaccine narrative receives coverage while all other theories are considered "fake news".

  

7.) Degradation - humiliate people who refuse to wear masks, social distance or accept vaccination, force people to walk in a certain direction in public places and stand in certain places when eating in line, force people to wait in line to access goods and services.

 

8.) Enforcing Trivial Demands - family members must not be in close contact with each other, suggestions like wearing a mask or using glory holes while having sex, force people to wear masks while in their own home while at the same time government officials don't obey their own proclamations.

 

It's very clear that governments, intentionally or unintentionally, are following every aspect of the Biderman Chart of Coercion during the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to control our every behaviour and force us to become willing automatons who cannot think for ourselves while those who are "in charge" cherry pick the rules that they wish to follow because, after all, they are both omnipotent and omniscient.