Unfortunately, thanks to
the images of a tiny, dead child on a Turkish beach, the world's attention has
become focused on the refugee/migrant crisis in Europe. While Europe is
on the front lines of the mass movement of what could turn out to be millions
of displaced Syrians and Iraqis and has already agreed that it will relocate 120,000 people in clear need of international protection (on top of the 40,000 that were proposed in May 2015), it is rapidly becoming apparent that both
Canada and the United States have paid little more than lip service to the
problem, even with the United States recently committing to take in at least 10,000 refugees over the next year. In the case of the United States, there have long been attempts to defuse the
problem by issuing this statement which stated that:
"The administration is actively considering a range of
approaches to be more responsive to the global refugee crisis, including with
regard to refugee resettlement. We are also in regular contact with
countries in the Middle East and Europe who have been greatly impacted by the
increased refugee flows."
Here's what the
State Department had to say about Syria in early August 2015:
"The United
States supports the Syrian people’s aspirations for a democratic, inclusive,
and unified Syria. The regime of Bashar al-Asad has violently suppressed what
began as a peaceful protest movement in Dar’a in March 2011. Asad has proven
through his brutal and repressive tactics that he has lost all legitimacy, and
he must go as part of a genuine political transition. Asad’s continued tenure
only fuels extremism and inflames tensions throughout the region. There can
never be a stable, inclusive Syria under his dictatorship.
The United
Nations estimates that at least 250,000 people have been killed since the
unrest and violence began four years ago. More than four million people are now
refugees in neighboring countries. Inside Syria, nearly 7.6 million people are
internally displaced and more than 12 million people remain in dire need of
humanitarian assistance. Despite the adoption of UN Security Council
Resolutions 2139, 2165, and 2191, the UN and others in the humanitarian
community continue to face significant challenges reaching many people in need
in Syria. Obstruction and ongoing violence by the regime, opposition, and
terrorist groups are continuing to hinder the delivery of urgent, life-saving
assistance to those in need inside Syria. All parties to the conflict in Syria
must allow safe, unfettered access to all in need."
The crisis
in Syria has created a situation that has resulted in 7.6 million internally displaced
Syrians, mainly in the Aleppo, Homs, Damascus, Deir Ex-Zor and Idlib regions.
The number of Syrians that have fled to neighbouring nations has
surpassed 4 million and the UN High Commission for Refugees expects that number
of reach around 4.27 million by the end of 2015. As
of mid-2015, the following nations have a significant number of Syrian
refugees:
Turkey - 1,805,255
Iraq - 249,726
Jordan - 629,128
Egypt - 132,375
Lebanon - 1,172,753
North Africa - 24,055
As well, more than
348,000 Syrians have made asylum applications in Europe.
To assist in this crisis,
State Department spokesman John Kirby recently said that the United States will accept
between 1000 to 2000 Syrian refugees in fiscal 2015 and between 5000 and
8000 Syrian refugees in 2016. To put this number into perspective, Germany expects to accept 800,000 asylum seekers in 2015, four times more than it accepted in 2014. In light of the millions of displaced
Syrians, why is the number of refugees that will be absorbed by the United
States so low? This letter from the House HomelandSecurity Committee to President Obama in June 2015 may help to explain why:
Let's emphasize this
paragraph:
"We are increasingly
concerned by the decision to accelerate the resettlement of thousands of Syrian
refugees here in the United States despite the serious national security
implications of doing so. There is a real risk that individuals
associated with terrorist groups will attempt to exploit the refugee
resettlement program in order to gain entry into our country. Terrorist
networks are constantly probing our defences and would not hesitate to
manipulate a program meant to save those fleeing violence for the purpose of
infiltrating operatives onto American soil." (my bold)
So, what has the United
States done and what is it planning to do? Again, I refer to what the
State Department had to say about the Syrian situation in early August 2015:
"To help those affected by the crisis in Syria, the United
States has contributed more than $4 billion in humanitarian assistance – the
most from any single donor. These resources support international and
non-governmental organizations operating under the humanitarian principles of
impartiality, independence, and neutrality to assist those in need who have
been affected by the conflict both inside Syria and across the region.
The United
States is also providing more than $400 million in non-lethal support to the
moderate Syrian opposition. This non-lethal assistance is helping the Syrian
Opposition Coalition (SOC), its component bodies, and affiliated opposition
entities, as well as local opposition councils, and civil society groups
provide essential services to their communities, extend the rule of law,
document abuses, and enhance stability inside opposition controlled areas of
Syria. These funds are also being used to provide non-lethal assistance to
vetted units of the moderate armed opposition, to help them to defend
themselves and the Syrian people against attacks by both the Asad regime and
violent extremist groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Non-lethal
assistance is being provided to a range of civilian opposition groups,
including local councils, civil society organizations, and SOC-affiliated
entities to bolster their institutional capacity, create linkages among
opposition groups inside and outside Syria, and help counter violent extremism.
These efforts enable the delivery of basic goods and essential services to
liberated communities as they step in to fill voids in local governance. In
addition to civil administration training programs, we have provided opposition
groups with a wide array of critical equipment, including generators,
ambulances, cranes, dump trucks, fire trucks, water storage units, search and
rescue equipment, educational kits for schools, winterization materials, and
commodity baskets for needy families in the local community.
The United
States is also helping to strengthen grassroots organizations and local
administrative bodies– a foundation of democratic governance – as they step in
to fill gaps in local governance and provide basic services, including
emergency power, sanitation, water, and educational services to their
communities. U.S. assistance also is being directed to maintaining public safety,
extending rule of law, documenting human rights violations and abuses and
violations of international humanitarian law, and mitigating sectarian
violence.
U.S.
non-lethal assistance includes training and equipment to build the capacity of
a network of thousands of grassroots activists, including women and youth, from
more than 400 opposition councils and organizations from around the country to
link Syrian citizens with the national- and local-level Syrian opposition. This
support enhances the linkages between Syrian activists, human rights
organizations, and independent media outlets and empowers women leaders to play
a more active role in transition planning.
Support to
independent media includes assistance to both television and radio stations;
mentoring from Arab media experts to broadcast professionals inside Syria;
training for networks of citizen journalists, bloggers, and cyber-activists to
support their documentation and dissemination of information on developments in
Syria; and technical assistance and equipment to enhance the information and
communications security of Syrian activists within Syria." (my bold)
Unfortunately, of the $4.53 billion required for refugee programs implemented by the United Nations and other NGOs, only $1.06 billion or 23 percent of the total needed had been received by the end of May 2015.
Unfortunately, of the $4.53 billion required for refugee programs implemented by the United Nations and other NGOs, only $1.06 billion or 23 percent of the total needed had been received by the end of May 2015.
Syria's
refugee crisis is extremely geopolitically complex, largely because so little
was done to uproot Bashar al-Assad from "his throne" back in 2011
when it became clear that human rights violations against Syrian civilians were
the order of the day. This has resulted in the creation of a power vacuum which has allowed an influx of Islamic State fighters who now control
significant parts of Syria as shown on this map:
This has left millions of Syrian refugees caught between a rock (Assad) and a hard place (the Islamic State). It has become apparent that the United States is reluctant to accept more than a
token number of Syrian refugees. Obviously, the provision of American humanitarian
and non-lethal assistance to civilian opposition groups has been a colossal
failure; apparently, when people are hungry and living in fear, the last thing
that they are thinking about is forming a grassroots movement against both
their President and the local arm of the Islamic State which now controls their
lives. Unfortunately, there is no easy solution to this lengthy crisis that has had a very high cost for millions of Syrian refugees.
Obviously, the provision of American humanitarian and non-lethal assistance to civilian opposition groups has been a colossal failure...
ReplyDeleteOh, gosh. The Us am the bad, terrible country again. We should just quit trying to help. Syria is in the EU's, not ours. The EU's all growed up know, what with their lavish welfare states and all. Maybe they should put on their big boy pants on and deal with this problem all by themselves. It should be entertaining to watch. Meantime, the US should take zero Syrian refugees. Zero, meaning 0. Zip. None. Nada. Let the enlightened and oh-so-lefty EU lead the way.
Syria in the EU !!!! Really, it's in the Middle East not Europe, geography not exactly your bag uh..
DeleteThat would be awesome if US fucked off to where they come from. Everyone would be better off. That is the best idea I have heard in a long time.
DeleteAbout two years I wrote a piece advocating the only and most likely solution for Syria would be to break the country into two parts. If Assad remains in power those who have suffered and been displaced will never forgive him and live under his rule. A change in ruling factions is also not a viable solution in that it would probably unleash a wave of killings, and reprisals. Remember the Shiite-related Alawites rightly fear an Al Qaeda led triumph as the worst possible outcome, they would make the mass killing of Alawites their first priority.
ReplyDeleteThe secular leaders of the Syrian rebels, clustered in the exile group known as the Syrian National Council, also must worry about the extremist threat they themselves would face if the Assad government fell. It all appeared a massively ugly mess and little has changed. More on why I finally came to this solution and why it still remains the best option in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/09/syria-must-be-split-in-two.html
Two isn't enough. The Kurds need piece as well. A 3 way split is what will actually happen over time. Whether its de-facto and the map stays the same or its three new countries with lines drawn on the maps this is what will likely occur. It will take an outside country to invade if the map is to stay the same and if the US is dumb enough to get rid of Al Assad they would need to stay for at least 10 years or more.
DeleteMaybe you'd go for a reprise of the Principality of Antioch and the County of Edessa? The (friendly) Emirs get the rest.
DeleteBe kind
ReplyDeleteBe kind
ReplyDelete