A
recent publication "We'll Live to 100 - How Can We Afford It?" by the
World Economic Forum examines the connection between increasing longevity, a
decreasing dependency ratio (the ratio of those in the workforce and those who
are retired) and the sustainability of the current retirement system.
Healthy pension systems are necessary to ensure a prosperous economy in
the future; if retirees see that their post-retirement lifestyle is not
sustainable from the time of retirement until they "depart this orb",
it will have a significant impact on their consumption habits. This would
have an obvious negative impact on the global economy and its long-term
stability.
Let's
start by looking at some demographic issues:
1.)
Increasing longevity:
The
global population aged 66 years and older will increase from 600 million today
to 2.1 billion in 2050.
2.)
Oldest age at which 50 percent of babies born in 2007 are predicted to still be
alive:
One
of the biggest problems facing the global pension system is the dropping
dependency ratio. Right now, the ratio of persons in the workforce to
persons in retirement is 8 to 1. This is expected to drop to 4 to 1 by
2050. This means that, in less than 35 years, the number of workers supporting
retirees will drop by half.
Now,
let's look at some economic issues:
1.)
Lack of access to pension plans: on a global basis, over 50 percent of workers
are in the informal or unorganized sector of the economy (i.e. self-employed)
and have limited access to workplace retirement plans.
2.)
Inadequate savings rates: to support a reasonable level of post-retirement
income, workers need to save between 10 and 15 percent of their annual
earnings. This is particularly a problem where workers are covered by
defined contribution plans which have no guarantee of benefits.
3.)
High degree of individual responsibility to manage pensions: with the
increase in the prevalence of defined contribution pension plans which now account
for more than 50 percent of global retirement assets, individuals are now
responsible for managing their own retirement savings. This requires the
individual to have at least some knowledge about how much they will need to
retire and what investments will provide the necessary returns to achieve their
savings goals.
4.)
Low investment return environment: thanks to the world's central banks, returns
on low-risk, interest-bearing investments that were traditionally the investment vehicle of choice for older investors, are well below historical averages
with bonds yielding between 1 and 3 percent lower than historical values and
equities yielding between 3 and 5 percent lower than historical values.
Additionally, high asset management costs in this low return environment
have further punished investors.
With
that background, let's look at the WEF's calculations for the global pension shortfall.
Their calculations assume that for most people, retirement will be
financed using a combination of three sources of income; government, employer
public or private sector pension and individual savings. The analysis
also assumes that post-retirement income will be 70 percent of pre-retirement
income, a level that is likely low for low-income workers who are likely to
need an income replacement rate closer to 100 percent of pre-retirement income.
Here is a graphic showing the size of the retirement savings gap in
trillions of dollars in 2015 and in 2050 with the orange numbers showing the
annual growth rate of the gap for the eight nations with the largest pension
systems or populations:
In
2015, the retirement savings gap was estimated to be around $70 trillion among
the eight nations which is approximately 1.5 times the annual GDP of these
eight nations. Based on WEF projections, the gap will grow by 5 percent
annually, hitting approximately $400 trillion by 2050, a deficit growth rate of
$28 billion daily. Looking specifically at the United States, the
retirement savings gap is growing by $3 trillion per year, equivalent to five
times the U.S. annual defense budget. Over the period from 2015 to 2050,
the savings gap will grow fastest in both China at 7 percent and India at 10
percent because of rapidly aging populations, a high percentage of informal
sector workers and a growing middle class.
The
current $70 trillion retirement gap is composed of these components:
1.)
75 percent is unfunded government and public employee pension commitments.
2.)
24 percent individual retirement savings shortfall.
3.)
1 percent unfunded corporate pension commitments.
To
close the current retirement savings gap and to prevent the gap from becoming a
$400 trillion behemoth, the authors recommend that the steps need to be taken
as follows:
1.)
provision of a safety net pension for all to prevent those who do not have
access to pension from dropping below the poverty line.
2.)
improve ease of access to well-managed and cost-effective retirement plans;
this is particularly a problem in economies like India's which has a high
percentage of informal workers who have no access to any type of workplace
pension system. Governments could potentially make it compulsory that all
employers automatically enroll all employees into retirement savings accounts.
3.)
support initiatives to increase contribution rates through the use of phased-in
automatic payroll deductions.
Unfortunately,
in this time of extremely high levels of government indebtedness, it is highly
unlikely that governments will be able to provide an enhanced publicly-funded
pension system, in fact, the American Social Security system is facing insolvency in the next decade and a half. As well, companies are facing significant underfunding
levels of their pension plans, making it unlikely that they will take steps to
enhance their retirement plans, in fact, many companies are moving from a
defined benefit to a defined contribution pension system which puts all of the
onus for funding one's post-retirement income on employees, many of whom have
limited investing experience. With the looming demographic nightmare of a
high number of retirees and a dropping number of workers contributing to the
pension system, I would suspect that the retirement savings gap is destined to
continue to grow, leading to a "cat food future" for many retirees.
This lack of savings will come back to haunt us. It is only logical that conflict will arise between different groups of our society concerning financial policy over entitlements. Today an American born in 1945 is receiving nearly $2.2m in lifetime net transfers from the "state" far more than they pay in. The problem is someone has to pay for this.
ReplyDeleteThe myth that funds have been set aside to provide for the social security payments and the medical needs of older Americans will soon be laid bare and the bill for such things is about to be laid at the feet of today's youth. The article below looks at what this means for all of us.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2017/01/generational-conflict-set-to-grow-over.html