The
Bank for International Settlements or BIS has recently released its 82nd annual report for the year 2011. As you may recall, BIS is an
intergovernmental organization of the world's central banks located in Basel,
Switzerland; in other words, it's the central bank for the world's central
banks. Scattered throughout this rather large document are a few gems
that I would like to include in this posting since, surprisingly, the
mainstream media pays very, very little attention to what BIS has to say.
BIS
opens by noting that the global economy is still struggling with the legacies
of the financial crisis and that "vicious cycles are hindering the
transition for both the advanced and emerging market economies". Not unexpectedly, the
world is experiencing a two-speed recovery; rather unexpectedly, this time
things are different because it is the world's "advanced" economies
that are suffering from lagging economic growth while emerging markets are
seeing their share of the world's economic growth rising as shown on these graphs:
The
economies that were at the centre of the 2008 - 2009 financial crisis are still
experiencing that splitting hangover headache from the collapse of their
respective real estate booms and their excessive household debt levels. BIS
states that household debt levels remain close to 100 percent of GDP in several
countries including Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. Accompanying
high household debt levels is the problem of highly leveraged governments and
financial sectors that are very slow to improve the problems on their balance
sheets, particularly in the world's developed economies.
This
has left the world's central bank system stuck between a rock and a very hard
place. Over the year that was 2011, central banks increased their
purchases of government bonds in an effort to shove stubborn interest rates
down right along the yield curve as a last ditch effort to prod the world's
reluctant economy back to life. At this point in time, the total
assets of the world's central banks stand at $18 trillion (and growing), a
level that is roughly 30 percent of global GDP. As I have posted before, here are a handful of graphs showing
how central bank balance sheets have grown and the assets that they hold:
BIS
points the fickle finger of fate at government inaction for backing the world's
central banks into a corner as average government deficits have risen from 1.5
percent of GDP in 2007 to 6.5 percent in 2011 and debt has risen from 75
percent of GDP to more than 110 percent in the same timeframe. To
bring government fiscal situations back to pre-crisis levels, it will take 20
consecutive years of surpluses exceeding 2 percent of GDP just to bring the
debt-to-GDP levels back to pre-Great Recession levels. To put it mildly, that is
about as likely as pigs learning how to fly between now and 2032. Unfortunately,
as I have said before, central banks have been their own worst enemies in some
ways; their ultra-cheap credit has led the ruling class around the world to
believe that they can continue to accrue debt at breakneck speed with no
repercussion. Here are two graphs showing the sharp contrast between
interest rates for the world's advanced and emerging market economies showing how
cheap credit is for what turns out to be the world’s most indebted economies:
Here's
what BIS has to say about where the fault lies (all bold is mine):
"The
extraordinary persistence of loose monetary policy is largely the result of
insufficient action by governments in addressing structural problems. Simply put:
central banks are being cornered into prolonging monetary stimulus as
governments drag their feet and adjustment is delayed. As we discuss in Chapter IV, any
positive effects of such central bank efforts may be shrinking, whereas the
negative side effects may be growing. Both conventionally and unconventionally
accommodative monetary policies are palliatives and have their limits....In
fact, near zero policy rates, combined with abundant and nearly unconditional
liquidity support, weaken incentives for the private sector to repair balance
sheets and for fiscal authorities to limit their borrowing requirements. They
distort the financial system and in turn place added burdens on supervisors.
With
nominal interest rates staying as low as they can go and central bank balance
sheets continuing to expand, risks are surely building up. To a large extent
they are the risks of unintended consequences, and they must be anticipated
and managed. These consequences could include the wasteful support of
effectively insolvent borrowers and banks – a phenomenon that haunted Japan in
the 1990s – and artificially inflated asset prices that generate risks to
financial stability down the road. One message of the crisis was that central
banks could do much to avert a collapse. An even more important lesson is
that underlying structural problems must be corrected during the recovery or we
risk creating conditions that will lead rapidly to the next crisis.
In
addition, central banks face the risk that, once the time comes to tighten monetary
policy, the sheer size and scale of their unconventional measures will prevent
a timely exit from monetary stimulus, thereby jeopardising price stability
(i.e. inflation). The result would be a decisive loss of central bank
credibility and possibly even independence."
Not
that a loss of central bank credibility hasn't already happened!
When
talking about "wasteful support of effectively insolvent...banks"
perhaps BIS need look no further than the bailout of the banking systems of
Spain, Ireland, Greece, Italy and many other nations.
Here
is a graphic from the report showing the "vicious cycle" that the
world's central banks are trapped in today:
Lest
those of us who live on the west side of the Atlantic get cocky, in closing,
here is an interesting comment from the annual report:
"Over
the past year, much of the world has focused on Europe, where sovereign debt
crises have been erupting at an alarming rate. But, as recently underscored
by credit downgrades of the United States and Japan and rating agency warnings
on the United Kingdom, underlying long-term fiscal imbalances extend far beyond
the euro area."
BIS' annual report for 2011 paints a rather grim but quite
realistic picture of what lies ahead for the global economy. What is particularly
concerning is that the outlook is so grim three years into the
"recovery". Unfortunately, it likely means that the next global
economic downturn will be even more painful than the Great Recession since, in
many ways, the economy never recovered from the last crisis.
Why are the stock markets not reacting? Is that because they think the consequences will not impact them for quite some time, or that they also rely on the MSM? I really can't image they rely on the MSM.
ReplyDeleteI have sadly come to the conclusion that the only outcome of this mess is government default at some point in the future--essentially a financial earthquake that will shake developed nations and the global economy.
DeleteThat central banks proceeded as they did has only had the effect of delaying the inevitable bust.
Alas, as Reinhart & Rogoff indicate we have been in this space before.
Peter
I agree. I'm putting my money into an bear ETF's.
Delete