Overall, the CBO reports that, to
the end of July 2012, the deficit was $975 billion, $125 billion less than the
$1.1 trillion deficit incurred for the first 10 months of fiscal 2011. Revenues rose by $114 billion and outlays
dropped by $11 billion as shown on this screen capture:
The deficit in July alone was $71
billion, down $58 billion from a year earlier, however, if one eliminates
one-time shifts in payment, the deficit for the month of July 2012 would only
have been down $22 billion from the same month a year earlier.
Revenues in July were up 15 percent
from the same month a year earlier, largely because of increased receipts from
individual income and payroll taxes.
While that looks good on paper, about half of the increase was due to an
additional work day in July 2012.
Outlays in July were $35 billion
lower than a year earlier, unfortunately, once again because July 1, 2012 fell
on a Sunday, about $36 billion in payments that would ordinarily have been made
in July, were made in June. Basically,
eliminating yet another one-off, outlays in July 2012 were $1 billion higher
than in July 2011.
Now, let’s look at the entire 10
month period starting with revenues and closing with outlays.
Here is a screen capture showing
revenues for the first 10 months of this fiscal year:
Revenues were up 6 percent on a
year-over-year basis with the largest increase coming from corporate taxes
which grew by $42 billion or 30 percent.
This is largely a result of changes in tax rules which govern how
quickly firms can deduct their capital expenditures. Individual tax receipts grew by only 4.1
percent with much of the increase due to growth in wages. Total receipts grew from $1.893 billion in
2011 to $2.007 billion in 2012, an increase of 6 percent. There was one interesting drop in revenue;
receipts from the Federal Reserve dropped by $6 billion largely due to lower
interest rates and the shift to lower-yielding less risky assets which resulted
in smaller profits and thus, smaller payments to the Treasury. See, there is another unintended consequence
of the Fed’s actions!
Here is a screen capture showing
outlays for the first 10 months of this fiscal year:
Spending through July was down less
than 1 percent on a year-over-year basis.
Allowing for one-off events, Department of Defense spending dropped by
2.6 percent, Medicaid spending dropped by 11.4 percent while Social Security spending
rose by 6 percent and spending on Medicare rose by 4.3 percent net of
receipts. By far, the largest
year-over-year percentage drop in spending was for unemployment benefits which
fell 21.1 percent from $104 billion to $82 billion despite the fact that the
number of unemployed only dropped by 8 percent from 13.908 million in July 2011
to 12.794 million in July 2012. As we
all know, long-term unemployed Americans are simply falling off the statistical
radar screen.
In closing, let’s take a quick look
at two of my favourite numbers starting with the debt-to-the-penny and closing
with the interest owing on the debt for the end of July 2012:
The total debt on July 31, 2012 was $15.933
trillion compared to $14.342 trillion on July 29, 2011, a rise of 11.1
percent. The interest owing on the outstanding
debt for the first 10 months of fiscal 2012 is misleading because of a one-time
accounting adjustment. Without the $75
billion adjustment, the total interest owing thus far this year would have been
just over $398 billion. Despite the fact
that interest rates on Treasuries are at or near all-time lows, it looks like
the interest owing on the debt for 2012 will come very close to hitting a new
record, somewhere in the $450 billion range without the one-time event. To put this into perspective, that’s roughly
what Washington will spend on Medicare for all of 2012.
In closing, as most of us expected,
Washington is headed for its fourth year in a row of trillion dollar plus
deficits, a new record even when adjusted for inflation. While the deficit is down from
the levels “achieved” between 2009 and 2011, the only thing saving the current
administration’s bacon is ultra-low interest rates on the outstanding
debt. If interest rates were to rise to
a historically normal level of 5 percent, the amount of annual interest owing
on the debt would swell to nearly $800 billion, more than what is currently spent annually on Social Security. That pretty much puts things into perspective, doesn't it?
One of the most ironic aspects is that many members of Congress are balking at the first major attempt to rein in spending. That attempt is the "sequester" and a lot of GOP are campaigning against it. I have no idea how they think we can reduce spending without cutting stuff! Fed up! --A proud supporter of the maligned sequester.
ReplyDeleteMagic! It's the only thing that will work!
ReplyDeleteThe debt will get much better if we grow the economy at a higher rate than we are adding debt. Focus on that, forget the debt for now. You are taking your eye off the ball. Remember all those lean years from the end of WW2 until, oh about the mid-70s or so when we toiled so mightily to pay off all that debt we incurred during the war? No? Me either.
ReplyDeleteTwo points. First, if interest rates rise then that probably implies the economy is growing and that means higher revenues for the Gov't which could theoretically offset any increase in the interest. Secondly, treasuries are generally sold in secondary market and thus investors are only concerned about the borrower (i.e., the U.S. gov't) paying interest which amounts to about $1.75 per hour per full time employee ($450 bln/134,000,000 workers/1950 hours) before taxes are taken out. The average pay on non farm payroll is about $23 per hour. That equates to 7.6% per hourly rate of pay to cover the entire interest on U.S. debt. Does not paint a better picture?
ReplyDeleteInterest rates can rise for reasons other than growth in the economy. Just ask the PIIGS nations. Three short years ago, their interest rates were all the same as their less indebted European counterparts. The secondary bond market certainly had a way of changing that quickly, didn't it?
ReplyDeleteIt's all a matter of perception. The beauty of bonds is in the eye of the beholder.
Don't worry about the debt? That's one of the most illogical things I've ever heard! If you want real economic growth, do what Estonia did. Cut spending with REAL austerity measures! They did that in 2009 and halved their unemployment rate in three years and now has one of the fastest, if not the fastest, growing economies in Europe. Interesting since the PIIGS are refusing to make real cuts and are still struggling. I guess Austrian economics works.
ReplyDelete