The NuclearThreat Initiative (NTI), a non-partisan, non-profit organization with a mission
to reduce the risk of the use of weapons of mass destruction, states that Syria
is suspected of having one of the most advanced chemical weapons
capabilities in the Middle East. Syria’s
initial sources of chemical weapons were supplied by Egypt prior to the October
1973 war with Israel; artillery shells containing sarin and mustard gas that
were never utilized. From this humble beginning, a cottage industry
developed and blossomed. By the
beginning of the new millennium, it is estimated that Syria was spending
between $1 billion and $2 billion dollars annually on
its ballistic missile and chemical and biological weapons capabilities.
Since the
1970s, Syria has developed the capability to produce mustard gas, sarin and
possibly VX nerve agent; many analysts feel that Syria's arsenal of CW is the
most formidable of any Arab State. Largely, it is believed that Syria
felt it necessary to develop these weapons to trump Israel's possession of
nuclear weapons and to counter Israel's superiority in both artillery and
armour.
As
background information, let's look at these chemical agents in turn:
1.) Mustard gas is also known as sulphur mustard.
Mustard gas is known as a vesicant or blistering agent because it causes
blistering of the skin, eyes and mucous membranes, particularly in the
respiratory tract. It is either odourless or has the smell of onions,
garlic or mustard. It can also damage DNA.
2.) Sarin is classified as a nerve agent; these
chemical warfare agents are considered among the most toxic and rapidly acting
of all chemical warfare agents. They are similar in nature to insect
pesticides known as organophosphates and were originally designed for use as pesticides.
Exposure is either through skin contact, through respiration or through
ingestion when sarin is mixed with water. Post-exposure symptoms to
odourless sarin vapour appear within seconds and within minutes to hours after
exposure to liquid sarin. Sarin exposure prevents the proper operation of
the chemicals that regulate the body's glands and muscles; as a result,
exposure to small doses can impact the victim's ability to breathe and can
result in changes to heart rate and blood pressure and exposure to large doses
results in loss of consciousness, paralysis and respiratory failure.
3.) VX is also classified as a nerve agent,
once again similar to organophosphate pesticides. Exposure is through
skin contact, eye contact or through respiration. VX is primarily a
liquid exposure hazard and does not mix easily with water. VX is the most
potent of all nerve agents, particularly if exposure is through skin surfaces.
Symptoms of exposure are similar to what is experienced with exposure to
sarin.
In 1971,
under a Presidential directive, Syria mobilized the Scientific Studies and
Research Centre (SSRC), a "civilian"agency that, by 1973, had become
the engine for the local development of weaponry for the Syrian Army.
Since it quickly became apparent that Syria would not be able to develop
nuclear weapons, President al-Assad and the director general of the SSRC,
Syrian nuclear physicist Abdullah Watiq Shahid, did a mid-course correction and
began to explore the option of developing chemical and biological warfare
agents. At one point and in what now appears to be an extremely ironic
move, the SSRC even secured funding from the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for the purchase of equipment.
The SSRC was responsible for setting up the first facility for the
production of chemical weapons, producing di-chloro, a main source of sarin.
Some of Syria's most important sources of knowledge for the manufacturing
of chemical weapons came from the USSR, Russia, West Germany, France and Iran.
Syria has
been producing chemical weapons since the 1980s at facilities located near
Hama, Homs and Al-Safira in the Aleppo region as well as Damascus, names that
have become familiar as sites of heavy military and rebel action in recent
weeks. Syria relies on foreign sources for equipment and precursor
chemicals with Iran being identified as a major supplier of Syria's chemical
weapons requirements. In 2005, Syria signed a mutual defence pact with Iran, allowing Iran
to store its weapons and missiles in Syria.
In addition, Syria agreed to store hazardous materials for Iran and Iran
would supply military aid to Syria including technology for weapons of mass
destruction and an upgrade of Syria's chemical and ballistic missile systems.
In return, Syria will continue to arm Hezbollah, the Iran-sponsored
terrorist group. This agreement was structured so that both nations would
protect each other from international pressures should either nation come under
the threat of sanctions or military action. This agreement greatly
complicates any efforts to unseat the al-Assad family, particularly through
military intervention.
Thanks to
Russia, China and North Korea, Syria has one of the largest arsenals of offensive weapons in the
Middle East. Syria has a large stockpile of Scud and short-range
ballistic missiles. According to Global Security, in 2003, Syria has a combined
total of between several hundred and a thousand Scud and SS-21 missiles,
capable of delivering chemical warheads. Syria has also developed a
longer-range Scud missile, the Scud D, with a range of 700 kilometres.
The Scud D was built with the aid of North Korean technology.
From
this information, you can quite quickly see that Syria has availed itself of
the technology from a diverse selection of the world's superpowers, major partner
countries in NATO and a handful of the world's pariah states. This has
allowed Syria to develop a home-grown chemical warfare industry that is
second-to-none in the Middle East. The greatest danger lies in the fact
that Syria has greater destructive capabilities than either Iran or Iraq yet,
until recently, these capabilities appear to have flown well under the radar of
the world's leadership and the mainstream media. Unfortunately for
Syria's civilians, the 18 month long uprising could have a very, very ugly
ending if the ruling class is cornered and desperation sets in. It appears that they have the ability to
inflict extreme pain if they so choose.
Assad is definitely not a nice person but many of the groups opposing him are not much better. Freedom vs oppression gets complicated by Sunni vs Shia which is further complicated by America vs Iran.
ReplyDeleteHezbollah, the Iran-sponsored terrorist group - in what way are they a terrorist group, a sincere question? When it comes to the Middle East and terrorist designations, I keep thinking of America where the Indians were savages and carried out atrocities while the Whites were innocent victims who never did anything aggressive, merely defended themselves.
It all depends on your classification of terrorist, doesn't it? The United States, Canada, Israel and Great Britain list Hezbollah as a terrorist group, however, the EU refuses to since Hezbollah is involved in the political process in the Middle East. That said, some top Hezbollah officials have been listed by the EU as terrorists.
ReplyDeleteYou're right. It is odd and very, very complicated.