There are many employment
statistics that play second fiddle to the headline U-3 data but two of them,
the employment cost index and average hourly earnings, affect every American
that still has a job.
Let's start by looking at
the employment cost index (ECI). This statistic measures the cost of
workers' wages and salaries as well as benefits and bonuses at all levels in
Corporate America. The Bureau of Labor Statistics bases the ECI on a
survey of employer payrolls in the final month of each quarter. The ECI
is considered a leading indicator of inflation since compensation generally
increases prior to companies increasing prices for its goods and services.
Here is a graph from FRED showing the
employment cost index since 2001:
While it might appear to be a steady increase, such is not the case. Here is the same data
showing the percentage change from the previous year:
Since the end of the
Great Recession, it is quite apparent that growth in the employment cost index
has been very low, ranging from 1.4 percent in Q3 2009 to 2.3 percent in Q4
2014 and has grown at an average rate of 1.83 percent over the five year period.
This compares to an average increase of 3.0 percent annually over the
period from Q1 2002 to Q1 2008. While there has been upward pressure in
employee costs over the last two quarters of 2014, the data would suggest that
there is very little upward pressure on inflation related to increases in
compensation.
Now, let's look at average
hourly earnings. Here is a graph from FRED showing average
hourly earnings of all employees in the private sector since early 2006:
Once again, while it may appear to be a slow and steady increase, the same data
showing the percent change from the previous year would suggest otherwise:
In December 2014, average
hourly earnings had increased from the previous year by only 1.65 percent.
Since the end of the Great Recession, on a year-over-year basis, average
hourly earnings have increased by an average of 2.0 percent. While the
data prior to the Great Recession is not complete, on a year-over-year basis,
average hourly earnings increased by an average of 3.4 percent.
To get a better sense of
pre-Great Recession earnings growth, while it doesn't cover all non-farm
occupations, we have a more complete database when we look at year-over-year increases in average hourly earnings of production and non-supervisory employees as shown here:
It is quite
apparent that the Great Recession had a significant impact on wage growth.
During the years between the 1990 - 1991 and 2001 recessions, the average
wage grew by 3.3 percent on a year-over-year basis. During the years
between the 2001 and 2008 recessions, the average wage grew by 3.1 percent on a
year-over-year basis. This is substantially more than the 2.0 percent
average annual increase since the end of the Great Recession.
The Federal Reserve is
obviously watching wage growth since increased wages foretell inflationary
pressures. Back in December 2006 when Alan Greenspan was her boss, Janet Yellen expressed concerns
that increasing employee compensation could have put increasing upward pressure
on inflation as shown in this comment:
"On the one hand,
recent labor market data point to a lower path for the unemployment rate than
before, and all else being equal, this boosts our inflation forecast a
bit. Offsetting this effect, on the other hand, is the huge downward
revision in compensation per hour. When these data came out, I let out a big
sigh of relief. The revised data are more consistent with the indications we
were getting from the employment cost index and suggest that wage growth has
remained contained."
Ms. Yellen made it quite
clear that her priority was to control inflation and that she was quite pleased
to see a downward revision in employee hourly compensation. From both the
employment cost index and the average hourly earnings data, it looks like Ms.
Yellen and her merry band of central bankers will be able to sleep comfortably
at night, knowing that the modest increases in compensation for America's
workers will put little upward pressure on inflation. That's one less thing that she needs to worry about when contemplating when she should push interest rates up.
No comments:
Post a Comment