With the Trudeau
government signalling that their first (and following budgets) are likely to
run deficits, I thought that it was time to take yet another look at Canada's
debt and deficit history as I have done for several years running. This
year, thanks to Royal Bank's research department, I have
additional metrics that may be of some interest to my readers. It is
important to note that statistics prior to fiscal 1983 - 1984 are not directly
comparable to later data since the method of accounting used by the federal
government changed to the full accrual method.
Let's open with a summary
of which prime ministers and political parties were in control of Canada's
federal coffers/Canadians' tax dollars by year:
1980 to 1984 - Pierre
Trudeau (Liberal)
1984 to 1984 - John
Turner (Liberal)
1984 to 1993 - Brian
Mulroney (Progressive Conservative)
1993 to 2003 - Jean
Chretien (Liberal)
2003 to 2006 - Paul
Martin (Liberal)
2006 to 2011 - Stephen
Harper (Conservative - minority)
2011 to 2015 - Stephen
Harper (Conservative - majority)
2015 to present - Justin
Trudeau (Liberal - majority)
As well, since there has
been substantial inflation over the 35 year period, here are some values to
help you ascertain how the real value of the Canadian dollar has declined at several
points in time from the Bank of Canada Inflation Calculator:
- by 168.14 percent
between 1981 and 2016
- by 55 percent between
1991 and 2016
- by 31.3 percent between
2001 and 2016
- by 7.62 percent between
2011 and 2016
Now, let's look at how
Canada's deficit picture has evolved over three and a half decades:
Of the 35 fiscal years,
only 12 or 34 percent have seen the federal government spend less than they
brought in as revenue. Other than the possible small surplus in fiscal
2014 - 2015, all of the surpluses occurred between fiscal 1997 - 1998 and
fiscal 2007 - 2008.
Now, let's look at what
has happened to the net federal debt over the same timeframe:
Over 35 fiscal years, the
net federal debt has grown from $109.6 billion in fiscal 1981 - 1982 to $612.3
billion in fiscal 2014 - 2015, growth of $502.7 billion or 459 percent.
If you use the Bank of Canada's Inflation Calculator which shows that
there was 168.14 percent inflation between 1981 and 2016, you can see that the
growth in the federal debt outstripped inflation by 2.7 times.
Now that we have the debt
and deficit data in mind, here are three additional government metrics that we
rarely hear about starting with the per capita net debt:
At $17,228, per capita
net debt is still below its peak of $19,010 seen back in fiscal 1996 - 1997,
however, up to fiscal 2014 - 2015, it has grown by 297 percent over the
thirty-five year period, 1.77 times the rate of inflation.
Let's now look at how
much the federal government spends on programs on a per capita basis:
Program spending has
risen from $2734 per capita in fiscal 1981 - 1982 to its current level of
$7141, an increase of $4407 or 161 percent. This is very close to the
rate of inflation over the thirty-five year period, however, given Canada's
aging population, unless the federal government is willing to cut back spending
on health care for seniors and other senior-related programs, per capita program spending is likely to rise
significantly (and likely more than the rate of inflation) over the next two
decades.
Let's close with a look at how government revenues have changed as a percentage of GDP:
It's interesting to observe that government revenues as a percentage of GDP fell right at the beginning of the Great Recession in fiscal 2008 - 2009 from roughly 16 percent of GDP to roughly 14 percent of GDP and how the revenue situation has not improved despite significant improvements in the economy after the end of the Great Recession.
Let's close with a look at how government revenues have changed as a percentage of GDP:
It's interesting to observe that government revenues as a percentage of GDP fell right at the beginning of the Great Recession in fiscal 2008 - 2009 from roughly 16 percent of GDP to roughly 14 percent of GDP and how the revenue situation has not improved despite significant improvements in the economy after the end of the Great Recession.
The saving grace for the
federal government over the past eight years has been the drop in interest
rates on new and outstanding debt. Here is a chart showing the yield on
Government of Canada ten year bonds since 1985:
If interest rates should
rise to average historical levels of around 6 percent, the federal government
would find its deficits growing at a far faster rate than they are currently.
As we can see from this
data, Canada's fiscal health has been negatively impacted by a series of
governments of both Liberal and Conservative persuasion. While Canada's fiscal picture is better than some of its G-20 peers, there is no doubt that if and when the
next recession hits, the federal government will find it very difficult to stimulus
spend its way out of trouble.
The two parties have mismanaged economy your stats assure us of that . In the 70s Canada blew it by not putting David Lewis of NDP into power. Canadians would of been living in a wealthy secure middle class . Anyway were stuck with a gutted middle class and alot of poverty and afew very wealthy 1% thks to Liberals & Conservatives . Possibly the young Canadians will figure it out meanwhile the Cons& Libs national debt grows every decade .
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for the stats, but the analysis is flawed. The government owns the Bank of Canada which issues a fiat currency, and the federal government can always spend on stimulus if it so chooses:
ReplyDeleteHow the Bank of Canada Creates Money for the Federal Government: Operational and Legal Aspects
Penny Becklumb,Mathieu Frigon, Economics, Resources and International Affairs Division, Library of Parliament
10 August 2015
http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2015-51-e.html?cat=economics
"By recording new and equal amounts on the asset and liability sides of its balance sheet, the Bank of Canada creates money through a few keystrokes. The federal government can spend the newly created bank deposits in the Canadian economy if it wishes."
***
".....there is no external limit to the total amount of money that the Bank of Canada may create for the federal government."
***
"The Bank of Canada's money creation for the Government of Canada is an internal government process. This means that external factors, such as financial markets dysfunction, cannot cause the federal government to run out of money."
______________________________
Modern Monetary Theory in Canada