Back when the Great
Recession hit, much of the near collapse of Wall Street and its banking system
were laid at the feet of those imaginative financial products like
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) which were basically bundled loans
(mainly mortgages) containing subprime loans that were sold to unsuspecting
consumers. Well, eight years later, it looks like "they're
baaaack" but in a slightly different form.
Let's start this posting
with a definition. "Securitization" is the practice of bundling
various types of debt including mortgages, consumer loans or auto loans and
selling their cash flows to third party investors as securities. Prior to
the Great Recession, the brilliant minds of Wall Street got the idea that they
could make billions of dollars by bundling residential mortgages into
mortgage-backed securities (MBS) which were secured by what turned out to be a
significant percentage of subprime loans that were granted to
less-than-creditworthy borrowers and selling them to anyone who wanted what
appeared to be a risk-free, bond-like investment.
Now, let's focus on the
subject of this posting. Here is a graph from FRED showing the growth
in securitized loans for motor vehicles:
Here is a graph showing the year-over-year growth in auto loans since 2000:
By the fourth quarter of
2015, securitized motor vehicle loans had reached a high of $1.039 trillion, up
by $213.8 billion or 25.9 percent from their pre-Great Recession high of $825.2
billion in the third quarter of 2005 and up by $340.6 billion or 48.8 percent from their
post-Great Recession low of $698.4 billion in third quarter of 2010.
Concern is growing over
the significant growth in lending for motor vehicles. While the volume of
collateralized auto loans aren't approaching the massive volume of
mortgage-backed securities, at over a trillion dollars, these speculative
investments that present themselves as a "sure thing" are starting to
show signs of weakness.
Here is a graph from Wells Fargo showing how
the Americans with poorer credit ratings (i.e. subprime borrowers) are having
trouble paying their monthly auto loans:
According to Bloomberg,
the default rate on auto loans is currently at 12.3 percent, the highest rate
since 2010. Some of this may be related to the collapse of oil prices
which have negatively impacted household incomes of families in Texas, Colorado,
Oklahoma and North Dakota. What is even more concerning is that, according to Equifax for the first four months of 2015,
23.5 percent of auto loans were issued to subprime consumers for an average
amount of $18,200. In total, 2.12 auto loans were made to consumers with
an Equifax Risk Score below 620 (considered subprime), up 9.6 percent over the
previous year.
Here are some comments from U.S. Comptroller
of the Currency, Thomas Curry, back in October 2015 about the securitization of auto loans:
"Auto lending is
another area of credit risk that we’ve had our eye on for several years. It’s
good news for automakers and for the economy as well that sales are rolling
along at record levels. It’s also good for banks, which have supplied a
significant amount of the financing that makes this activity possible, either
directly to purchasers or indirectly through car dealerships. At the end of the
second quarter of 2015, auto lending represented more than 10 percent of retail
credit in OCC-regulated institutions, up from 7 percent in the second quarter
of 2011. And, increasingly, banks are packaging these loans into asset-backed
securities rather than holding them in a portfolio. These securities are being
greeted by strong demand from investors, who no doubt remember that securities
backed by auto loans outperformed most other classes of asset- back securities
during the financial crisis.
But what is happening in
this space today reminds me of what happened in mortgage- backed securities in
the run up to the crisis. At that time, lenders fed investor demand for more
loans by relaxing underwriting standards and extending maturities. Today, 30
percent of all new vehicle financing features maturities of more than six
years, and it’s entirely possible to obtain a car loan even with very low
credit scores. With these longer terms, borrowers remain in a negative equity
position much longer, exposing lenders and investors to higher potential
losses. Although delinquency and losses are currently low, it doesn’t require
great foresight to see that this may not last. How these auto loans, and
especially the non-prime segment, will perform over their life is a matter of
real concern to regulators. It should be a real concern to the industry.
Neither auto loans nor
home equity loans are inherently unsafe. That’s true for most asset classes.
However, what is inherently unsafe are excessive concentrations of any one kind
of loan. You don’t need a very long memory to recall the central role that
concentrations—whether in residential real estate, agricultural land, or oil
and gas production—have played in individual bank failures and systemic
breakdowns. It’s an old movie that’s been reprised on a regular basis. That’s
why we’re closely watching growing exposures in commercial real estate loans,
especially in the construction and multifamily housing sectors, as well as in
loans to non- depository financial institutions." (my bold)
And, it looks like
trouble in the sector has already started as shown on this release from Asset-Backed Alert about Skopos Financial's
most recent securitization of subprime auto loans:
"The collateral
for Skopos Financial’s most recent securitization of subprime auto loans is
performing worse than expected, feeding fears of an impending liquidity crunch
in the asset class.
At issue is
a $154 million transaction that Skopos completed on Nov. 9 with Citigroup
running the books. That issue’s top class earned ratings of A/AA from DBRS and
Kroll, but already has experienced enough collateral defaults to approach a
“cumulative net loss ratio trigger event” set by Kroll.
Should losses reach that level, Skopos would
have to stop collecting excess cashflows and redirect the money to bondholders.
Such an event would make it difficult for the
Irving, Texas, company, founded by former Drive Financial executive Mark
Gallas, to continue doing business as usual — and would make it virtually
impossible for Skopos to raise additional capital through securitization.
Sources said other deep-subprime lenders including Go Financial and United Auto
Credit face similar pressures due to rising losses among the loans underpinning
their securitizations.
“For these smaller firms, securitization is
their only source of funding in this space,” one source said. “It only takes
one deal of theirs to go sideways in terms of performance and they can impact
the whole subprime-ABS market.”” (my bold)
Once again, whether they
want to admit it or not, the Federal Reserve's near zero interest rate policy
comes home to roost. With interest rates on no-risk 5 year CDs looking
like this:
...in the search for
reasonable yield, investors have taken on far more risk than they normally
would. With the default rate on auto loans rising, there could be a lot
of tears among small retail investors that thought that they were buying a sure
thing. On top of that, with auto loans
at near-zero levels, consumers are being lured into borrowing money to buy cars
that they simply cannot afford.
No comments:
Post a Comment