A fascinating study
entitled "Democracy at Risk" by Carbon Black looks
at how the American voting system is at risk and how it could impact voter
turnout during the 2016 election cycle.
As we all remember, the
contested 2000 election between George W. Bush and Al Gore revealed the
weaknesses how America conducts its federal elections. While there has been no
indications that the technology used in American elections has been tampered
with, there are significant vulnerabilities as follows:
1.) the ease of which
electronic voting machines can be manipulated to alter votes.
2.) the ability to
compromise voter-registration databases.
3.) the prospect that
voting systems can either be shut down, delayed or that voting can be
restricted.
The recent hacking of the
Democratic National Committee shows us just how vulnerable the American political
system is to outside manipulation.
Carbon Black conducted an
online survey of American voters to better understand their concerns about the
security of the nation's inventory of electronic voting machines and how this
could impact voter turnout. In case you wondered, about 25 percent of
U.S. voters or 55 million voters in total will use electronic voting machines
on November 8th, 2016. The most vulnerable voting machines are the
direct-recording electronic or DRE machines. Interestingly, many of these
machines are running operating systems that are significantly outdated; for
example, some machines are still using Windows XP as their operating system,
an operating system that has not had any security support from Microsoft since
April 2014. Here is a map showing states which still use DRE voting
machines (coloured turquoise):
Now, let's look at how
voters feel about the security vulnerabilities in electronic voting machines:
In total, 18 percent of
voters are very concerned and 38 percent of voters are concerned that this
year's election could be affected by hacking/cyber attacks. In addition,
36 percent of voters feel that their voting information is insecure with only
12 percent of voters feeling that their voting information was very secure.
If these concerns translate into voter inaction, the one in five
voters who stated that they would consider not voting in the 2016 election
cycle because of their cyber-security concerns would result in more than 15
million voters not voting on Election Day.
Currently, some states
tether their electronic voting machines to a voter-verified paper audit trail
or VVPAT, a system which allows voters to verify that their vote was cast
correctly. This provides an additional layer of security and allows for post-election
audits of voting. That said, only about half of states have what are
termed "meaningful post-election audits".
Let's close this posting
by looking at which entities American voters feel pose the greatest risks to
the security of the current voting system in order from greater risk to lowest
risk:
1.) Insider threat from
the United States - 28 percent
2.) Russia - 17 percent
3.) Election candidates -
15 percent
4.) North Korea - 14
percent
5.) China - 13 percent
6.) Iran - 9 percent
Isn't it interesting to
see that a very substantial 43 percent of respondents felt that the greatest
threat to the United States election system comes from within the United
States? This speaks volumes about American voters' trust in their own
election system. It's really no wonder that Donald Trump has appealed to
millions of voters with his "rigged election" comment as shown here:
There is already strong evidence that our elections have been hacked in a very big way. Simply google "Steven Spoonamore" the Republican IT security specialist who identified late night voting anomalies in Ohio in 2004 which handed democratic districts and the election to Bush. Examples 2 and 3 are the recent gubernatorial elections in both Kansas and Kentucky. Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article17139890.html#storylink=cpyWhile From the article at the link: "it is well-recognized that smaller, rural precincts tend to lean Republican, statisticians have been unable to explain the consistent pattern favoring Republicans that trends upward as the number of votes cast in a precinct or other voting unit goes up. In primaries, the favored candidate appears to always be the Republican establishment candidate, above a tea party challenger. And the upward trend for Republicans occurs once a voting unit reaches roughly 500 votes."
ReplyDeleteSo American voting concerns are quite legitimate because election fraud has, and likely will happen again.