With Barack Obama's eight
year stint in the Oval Office coming to an end and his persona (at least to
those who don't really pay attention) as a "peacemaker", a recent analysis by Micah Zenko provides us
with an interesting glimpse at his real foreign military approach.
Before we get into the
meat of this posting, let's look at a bit
of history from 2009:
Here is what the Nobel Committee had to say in October 2009 about the President who had been in office for less than ten months at that point in time:
"The Norwegian
Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009
is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to
strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The
Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a
world without nuclear weapons.
Obama has as President
created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has
regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations
and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are
preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international
conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated
disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the
USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic
challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be
strengthened.
Only very rarely has a
person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its
people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that
those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes
that are shared by the majority of the world's population.
For 108 years, the
Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international
policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading
spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for
all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global
challenges." (my bold)
With that in mind,
let's get back to Micah Zenko's analysis. Here is a table showing
the number of U.S. bombs that were dropped in all of its current theatres of
operation during 2016:
The vast majority of
bombs, 24,287 in total, were dropped during the anti-Islamic State Operation
Inherent Resolve in both Syria and Iraq which received 2,963 and 2,941
airstrikes respectively. Of the 7,473 coalition airstrikes in Iraq and
Syria, the United States was responsible for 5,904 or 79 percent of the total.
Of the total of 30,743 bombs that were dropped by America's coalition
partners, the United States dropped 24,287 or 79 percent of the total.
When looking at the coalition bombing statistics on a national basis, in
2016, the United States conducted 67 percent of the airstrikes in Iraq and 96
percent of the airstrikes in Syria.
Just in case you
wondered, 2015 was also a bomb-dropping bonanza
with a total of 23,144 bombs dropped including 22,110 in Iraq and Syria, the
major beneficiaries of the Peace President's munificence as shown here:
Apparently, Obama-style
Nobel Peace Prize-winning international diplomacy included materiel raining from the sky on the innocent and guilty alike.
Barack Obama has the distinction of being the only U.S. president to
serve his entire eight year term in a state of war including operations in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia and Syria. That is his
legacy.
The stats are interesting but where did you get the idea that Obama was regarded as a "peacemaker".
ReplyDeleteOutside of the USA he is regarded as another just another imperial US president who does not mind killing anyone who is not US citizen (and even that seems dubious).