Updated March 15, 2017
I haven't posted on this subject for nearly a year but with the Federal Reserve's recent revelation that they might consider raising rates if labour market and inflation conditions looked "appropriate" as shown here...
I haven't posted on this subject for nearly a year but with the Federal Reserve's recent revelation that they might consider raising rates if labour market and inflation conditions looked "appropriate" as shown here...
"In discussing the outlook
for monetary policy over the period ahead, many participants expressed the view
that it might be appropriate to raise the federal funds rate again fairly soon
if incoming information on the labor market and inflation was in line with or
stronger than their current expectations or if the risks of overshooting the
Committee's maximum-employment and inflation objectives increased."
... and the mainstream
media's frothing at the mouth as shown here in an article on FT.com entitled
"Fed Flags Interest Rate Rise "Fairly Soon"...
"Many of the Federal
Reserve’s policymakers said they should be ready to lift short-term interest
rates again “fairly soon”, minutes from the last meeting (January 31 - February
1, 2017) revealed, setting the stage for intense debate at the next gathering
as the US economy strengthens...Despite the
background of political wrangling, the US economy has continued to see a robust
expansion that many Fed policymakers think supports their median projection for
three rate rises this year..." (my bold)
...it seemed to be a very
good time to revisit a topic that provides us with insight about the strength
of the economy in more-or-less real-time, insight that may show us the Fed's
future policy direction.
What many business
writers fail to do is examine the Federal Reserve's own tool that can be used
to actually gauge the health of the economy. The Center for
Quantitative Economic Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has
developed a tool that provides us with a predictor of the seasonally adjusted
annual rate of real GDP growth called GDPNow. The GDPNow model uses
similar methods to those used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to
estimate real GDP growth by using an aggregate of 13 economic subcomponents
that comprise GDP. As additional monthly economic source data becomes
available, the GDPNow forecast for a given quarter is updated and its accuracy
improves. GDPNow forecasts begin the week after the BEA's advance
estimate of GDP growth for the previous quarter is released and is updated six
or seven times monthly with the following data points:
1.) Manufacturing ISM
Report on Business
2.) U.S. International
Trade in Goods and Services
3.) Wholesale Trade
4.) Monthly Retail Trade
5.) New Residential
Construction
6.) Advance Report on
Durable Goods Manufacturers
7.) Personal Income and
Outlays
Other data releases
including Existing-Home Sales and Industrial Production and Capacity
Utilization are also included in the model.
Here is a table showing the data sources used
to calculate GDPNow:
With this background,
let's look at the latest GDPNow forecast for the first quarter of 2017 with the
green line showing the evolution of the GDP growth forecast over the
quarter as data has come in:
The current model
predicts that GDP for Q1 2017 will grow by a tepid 0.9 percent, well down from
the 3.4 percent predicted at the end of January 2017 and down 0.9 percentage points from March 1, 2017. Here is a table showing how the data releases since the end of January have negatively affected the GDP estimate:
A growth level of 0.9 percent can hardly be termed a "robust expansion". It is also well below historical economic growth rates as shown here:
A growth level of 0.9 percent can hardly be termed a "robust expansion". It is also well below historical economic growth rates as shown here:
Obviously, with its
record-breaking policy of ultra-low interest rates, the Fed has painted itself
into the "monetary policy corner" when it comes to dealing with the
next economic slowdown/recession. Obviously, the braintrust at the Fed is
concerned about this very issue as you can see from this quote taken directly from the minute of
the January 31 - February 1, 2017 FOMC meeting:
"A few participants
noted that continuing to remove policy accommodation in a timely manner, potentially
at an upcoming meeting, would allow the Committee greater flexibility in
responding to subsequent changes in economic conditions."
That sounds like a fancy
way of saying "the Fed is screwed when the next recession arrives
unless interest rates rise as we have promised". If GDP growth is as low as the current GDPNow model predicts, the Fed may well be screwed and any lowering of their key interest rate will be temporary at best.
Growth is tepid at best considering the money spent to achieve it. Sadly this is even after we have allowed numbers that mean "nothing" to seep into how the gross domestic product (GDP) is calculated all in an effort to create the illusion of growth. In 1962 Kuznets, the father of the GDP formula emphasized that we must keep in mind the difference between quantity and the quality of growth. He made clear a distinction exist between cost and returns.
ReplyDeleteThe number we are spoon fed and await with such glee has little to do with real growth but most likely mirrors or is merely a reflection of monetary pumping. The GDP number fails to highlight a slew of important factors that feed directly into our standard of living and the health of our economy. More about this subject in the article below.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2015/05/gdp-number-is-master-illusion.html