Aerosolized Vaccines - The Ultimate Solution to Vaccine Hesitancy During the Next Pandemic?

One thing that the powers that ought not to be discovered during the COVID-19 pandemic was that a certain and rather significant portion of the population was hesitant to mindlessly following government mandates to be vaccinated with what they viewed as an experimental gene-based product.  As you will see in this posting, it is quite possible that technological advances could be used to ensure widespread vaccination during the next pandemic, even among those who are vaccine hesitant.

  

Back in 2018, EcoHealth Alliance submitted a proposal to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA, a research and development agency of the United States Department of Defense codenamed DEFUSE which outlined plans to defuse the threat of bat-borne coronaviruses as shown here:

 

 

As part of the solution to coronavirus infection and resultant spreading, the researchers associated with this project would deploy vaccines using one of four methods on bats located in three caves in China's Yunan province being studied by EcoHealth Alliance scientists in partnership with the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology.  In this particular case, to control the spread of the coronavirus, the vaccines (aka immune boosting molecules) would be deployed using different delivery methods including:

 

1.) transdermally applied nanoparticles

 

2.) sticky edible gels that bats mutually groom and consume

 

3.) aerosolization via prototype sprayers

 

4.) automated sprays triggered by timers and movement detectors

 

It is the aerosolization via prototype sprayers that I want to focus on in this posting.  Here are twon excerpts from page 20, 21 and 22 of the proposal:

The proposal refers to Filament Extension Atomization or FEA technology developed at Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), a subsidiary of Xerox Corporation.  Here is a screen capture from the Stanford Research Institute's website which provides details on the Filament Extension Atomizer technology:

 

 

Note that the FEA technology can be used for drug delivery as part of its "wider range of applications".

  

Here is a video on Filament Extension Atomizer technology:

 

 

Now, let's put this technology together with the projected explosion in the use of drones by the military.  Do you trust your government enough to believe that they wouldn't use vaccine aerosolization technology as a means to vaccinate all of its citizens, even those who are vaccine hesitant for valid scientific reasons, during the next pandemic?  This sheds a whole new light on the "mandatory vaccination" mantra, doesn't it?

What Big Pharma Doesn't Know About the COVID-19 Vaccines

While the mainstream media, public health officials and politicians would have us believe that the COVID-19 vaccines are well understood and that any negative side effects are either minimal or inconsequential in fact, as you will see in this posting, such decrees could not be further from the truth.

  

Here is a screen capture showing the lead page of a document entitled Summary Basis for Regulatory Action that appeared on the Food and Drug Administration website dated November 8, 2021, keeping in mind that this is nearly 11 months after the first COVID-19 vaccine was administered in the United States (December 14, 2020):

 

This is the FDA's approval document for the COMIRNATY vaccine manufactured by Pfizer and BioNTech and, in this case, was in response to BioNTech's application for approval dated May 18, 2021.

  

The 30 page-long document goes on to outline the chemistry, manufacturing and controls of COMIRNATY, clinical and nonclinical pharmacology, toxicology as well as safety and pharmacovigilance information.  

 

Before we go any further and so that you can understand one of the terms in this posting, let's look at the definition for "humoral response" also known as humoral immune response:

 

"The humoral immune response fights pathogens that are free in the bodily fluids, or “humours”. It relies on antigens (which are also often free in the humours) to detect these pathogens. An antigen is a biomolecule, such as a protein or sugar, that binds to a specific antibody. An antibody/antigen interaction may stimulate an immune response. Not every biomolecule is antigenic and not all antigens produce an immune response. B cells are the major cell type involved in the humoral immune response. When a foreign antigen (one coming from a pathogen, for example) is detected, B cells in the body that recognize that antigen will begin to produce antibodies as a means of fighting off the foreign invader."

  

Basically, humoral immunity is the human body's response to the detection of foreign material (antigens).

  

Now, let's look at section 5 "Clinical Pharmacology" as found on page 15 in the aforementioned document.  Here is the page in its entirety with a pertinent section highlighted:

 

The manufacturer of the COMIRNATY mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is aware that the human body responded to the administration of the vaccine by creating an immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein however, "the exact immunologic mechanism that confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 is unknown."

 

Let's boil this down.  Despite the fact that Big Pharma doesn't understand the immunological mechanism behind their COVID-19 vaccine, they went ahead and requested (and received) approval for widespread administration of COMIRNATY.  That said, it would also be the case that they can't possibly understand the mechanisms that create negative side effects of this product as well, particularly over the medium- and long-term.

 

But, we won't hear that from the mainstream media, public health officials or politicians, will we?  Their philosophy has been to force us to get our COVID-19 vaccines so that we can get some of ourr rights back.

The High Potential Cost to Taxpayers of COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Injuries

Australia, one of the nations with the harshest anti-COVID-19 responses, has come up with a new plan for those who have been injured or even killed by COVID-19 vaccines.

  

Here is their plan:

 

 

The scheme covers losses or expenses of $1,000 or more due to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine that was approved by Australia's national Therapeutic Goods Administration, the government's authority which is responsible for evaluating, assessing and monitoring products that are defined as therapeutic goods, ensuring that Australians remain healthy and safe.

 

Claimants must meet all of the following criteria to receive compensation under the scheme:

 

1.) received a Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved COVID-19 vaccine

2.) met the definition of harm, like one of the clinical conditions listed in the policy

3.) been admitted to hospital as an inpatient because of the harm you suffered or seek a waiver

losses or expenses of $1,000 or more, excluding pain and suffering, due to the COVID-19 vaccination.

 

The following conditions are eligible:

 

1.) If you had AstraZeneca Vaxzeria, the following clinical conditions are accepted under the scheme:

Anaphylactic reaction

Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome

Capillary leak syndrome

Demyelinating disorders including Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Thrombocytopenia, including immune Thrombocytopenia.

2.) If you’ve had Pfizer/Biontech Comirnaty or Moderna Spikevax, the following clinical conditions are accepted under the scheme:

Anaphylactic reaction

Myocarditis

Pericarditis.

3.) If you had Novavax Nuvaxovid, the clinical condition of anaphylactic reaction is accepted under the scheme.

The following conditions and injuries are not accepted with the first one being particularly interesting:

1.) contracting COVID-19

2.) psychological and psychiatric conditions

3.) secondary injuries, like an injury suffered when fainting, or a haematoma where you were injected that becomes infected.

These other side effects aren’t accepted under the scheme:

1.) headache

2.)fatigue

3.) injection site reaction

4.) muscle or joint pain

5.) dizziness

6.) diarrhoea

7.) pain in extremity

8.) fever

9.) insomnia

10.) nausea or vomiting

11.) lethargy

12.) hyperhidrosis

13.) chills

14.) decreased appetite

15.) malaise

16.) lymphadenopathy

17.) somnolence

18.) abdominal pain

19.) puritus

20.) urticaria or rash

21.) influenza-like illness

22.) angioedema

23.) anxiety-related reactions

 

Claimants can claim for lost earnings, out of pocket expenses, pay for attendant care services, gratuitous attendant care, loss of capacity to provide domestic services, pain and suffering costs and, most interestingly, deceased COVID-19 vaccine recipient payments and funeral costs.  Let's look more closely at the last category as shown on this screen capture:

 

I find it fascinating that the Australian government, unlike most other Western governments (particularly Canada's) are admitting that there is a possibility, even though it may be very unlikely, that the approved COVID-19 vaccines could result in death (among other potential outcomes that are covered under Australia's COVID-19 vaccine claims scheme).  It will be interesting to see how long it is before other governments who coerced their citizenry into accepting these vaccines are forced to "pay up".  Unfortunately, it's our tax dollars that are going to pay to cover these costs rather than being covered by Big Pharma and its very deep pockets who have been legally absolved of any responsibility for COVID-19 vaccine-related injuries, no matter how severe.

COVID-19 Vaccine Trials and Pregnant Women - What Did Pfizer Know?

While I have stepped back from commenting on the COVID-19 pandemic, every so often there is a story that needs to be told. 

As some of you may be aware, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was forced by court order to release the documents that it relied on to approve Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine despite insisting that they needed 75 years to release an estimated 450,000 pages.  The court order forced the FDA to release the data within 8 months (starting in March 2022) which has led to a massive amount of data for the outside world to pick through to ascertain what Pfizer and the FDA knew about the vaccine prior to its rollout.   The problem has been the huge volume of data that is being released in no particular order, making it difficult for analysts.  Nonetheless, one of the more interesting releases took place on July 1, 2022 as shown here:

 

In looking through this adverse event listing dated April 1, 2021 with a cutoff date of March 13, 2021 and a snapshot date of March 25, 2021, on page 3643 we find the following listing of subjects who reported that they were pregnant after at least one dose of BNT162b2 (and up to 4 doses):

 

 

There was a total of 50 trial participants who became pregnant during the trial phase.  Eight of the women were given the placebo and 42 were given the trial drug.  The eight women who received the placebo were unblinded and, by the date of the publication of the document, all fifty of the women were receiving BNT162b2.

  

Now, let's look at the number of women who suffered from the following:

 

1.) abortion spontaneous

 

2.) abortion spontaneous complete

 

3.) abortion spontaneous incomplete

 

4.) miscarriage

 

Pfizer reported the miscarriages as serious adverse events or SAE's with "moderate" or a rating of 2 and "severe" or a rating of 3.  The causes of the miscarriages were classified as "O" meaning "other" (i.e. the vaccine did not cause the miscarriage) and Vaccine Related (Vax Rel) relationship of either "yes" or "no" as assessed by the investigator.

 

Here are some of the screen captures of the women who suffered from one of the four miscarriage types as noted above:

 

You can find all of the miscarriages on the following pages: 219, 561, 708, 1071, 1146, 1179, 1349, 1749, 1758, 1806, 1809, 3519, 3526, 3530,  3560, 3536, 3537(2), 3538, 3546, 3547 and 3551(2).

  

I do find it interesting that Pfizer classified the seriousness of some of the miscarriages as a "2" or "3" at worst.  Out of the 50 pregnancies that took place during the Pfizer BNT162b trial, 23 or 46 percent ended in either a complete or incomplete spontaneous abortion or miscarriage and yet Pfizer, in its infinite wisdom, interpreted this as a non-event since it determined that all of the miscarriages were attributable to "other" causes.

 

Keep in mind that the Food and Drug Administration had access to all of this data by the beginning of April 2021 and yet they still approved the vaccine for pregnant women and did not flag the fact that Pfizer attributed none of the miscarriages to its "magic COVID-19 concoction".  In fact, this is what the CDC had to say about pregnant women and the COVID-19 vaccines:

 

  

...and this is what the Government of Canada had to say about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women:

People should be asking their governments why they insisted that pregnant women be vaccinated against COVID-19 when Pfizer's trial evidence strongly hinted otherwise.  Why did governments accept Pfizer's insistence that other causes resulted in an inordinately large number of miscarriages among its pregnant trial participants given that only 10 to 20 percent of normal pregnancies end up in miscarriage.

The Thailand Myocarditis Study - Is This the Safety Signal That Will Halt Adolescent COVID-19 Vaccinations?

While it hasn't received a great deal of coverage in the mainstream media, myocarditis has proven to be one of the adverse side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly among young males.  While government health officials have taken the stance that there are insufficient cases of myocarditis among young males to send out a safety signal to vaccine manufacturers and those who are being vaccinated as shown here for Canada:

 

 ...and here for the United States:

Based on what government "experts" are telling us, one could be forgiven for thinking that the risk of COVID-19 in adolescents is far higher than the risk of post-COVID-19 vaccination cardiac adverse events.

According to the Myocarditis Foundation, while many myocarditis patients live long lives post-diagnosis  with no major long-term side effects, in some cases, ongoing cardiovascular medications and even heart transplants may be needed.  Here are two quotes:

 

"Overall, myocarditis which can cause dilated cardiomyopathy, are thought to account for up to 45 percent of heart transplants in the U.S. today...

  

...myocarditis can recur, and in some cases can lead to a chronically enlarged heart (called dilated cardiomyopathy). There is no known way to prevent recurrence of myocarditis. However, the risk of recurrence is low (probably about 10 to 15 percent)."

 

A recent peer-reviewed prospective cohort study of the cardiovascular effects of Pfizer's Comirnaty/BNT162b2 vaccine on adolescents living in Thailand:

 

...looked at the post-vaccination health of 301 adolescents (202 males and 99 females) aged 13 to 18 years with a mean of 15 years from two schools using ECG, echocardiography and cardiac enzymes which were collected at baseline (i.e. prior to vaccination), days 3, 7 and 14 (optional) after receiving the second dose of the vaccine.  Patients who had a history of cardiomyopathy, tuberculosis, constrictive or tuberculosis pericarditis or an allergy to the COVID-19 vaccine were excluded from the study.

  

Cardiovascular manifestations were recorded  including the following:

 

1.) Chest pain/pericarditis

 

2.) Dyspnea/orthopnea

 

3.) Palpitation

 

4.) Hypertension/hypotension

 

5.) Tachycardia/bradycardia

 

6.) Shock/cardiogenic shock

 

7.) Abnormal ECG or abnormal rhythm or ECG change

 

8.) Bundle branch block

 

9.) Decreased ejection fraction

 

10.) Diastolic dysfunction

 

11.) Elevation in at least one cardiac biomarker (troponin‐T, CK‐MB)/myocarditis

 

 Myocarditis patients were those with the presence or worsening of one or more of the following clinical symptoms along with evidence of inflammation:

 

1.) chest pain, pressure, or discomfort

2.) dyspnea, shortness of breath, or pain with breathing

3.) palpitation

4.)  syncope and more than one new finding of: (a) troponin level above upper normal limit of normal; (b) abnormal ECG or rhythm monitoring consistent with myocarditis; (c) abnormal cardiac function or wall motion on echocardiography; (d) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) findings consistent with myocarditis and no identifiable cause for symptoms and findings.

 

Pericarditis patients were those with new presence or worsening of more than two of the following clinical features: 

1.) acute chest pain

2.) pericardial rub on exam

3.) new ST‐segment elevation or PR‐segment depression on ECG

4.) pericardial effusion on echocardiography or cMRI.

 

As well, all participants had a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T assay at baseline, and on Day 3, Day 7, and Day 14 (optional) after the second vaccination dose.  Troponin is a type of protein that is normally found in the muscles of the heart.  It is not normally found in blood unless there has been damage to the heart.  As heart damage increases, troponin levels also increase.  As such, troponin is invaluable in diagnosing heart attacks and other heart-related health issues.

   

Here are some of the results of the ECG findings in chart form:

 

After vaccination, ECG revealed that 247 (82.06 percent) of the 301 patients had normal sinus rhythm and 54 (17.94 percent) had abnormal ECG rhythm.  

  

Here is a table showing the patients with positive lab assessments or elevated biomarkers (troponin-T):

Note that the baseline troponin-T level in all 7 patients is low prior to vaccination and that in 5 cases, the troponin-T levels continue to rise for at least two weeks after 2 doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine is administered.  Using a 14 pg/mL cutoff, the combined clinical and subclinical rate of myocarditis is 2.5 percent (5 divided by 202 male participants).  It is also important to note that among the 99 females in the study, there were no patients with elevated post-vaccination troponin-T levels.

  

From this study, it would appear that heart damage in male adolescents continues well after the second dose of Pfizer's BNT162b2 vaccine.  Unfortunately, scientists do not know what level of heart damage is required before there is an increased risk of a cardiac event which could well be life-shortening nor do they know if these cardiovascular manifestations are transient.

  

Let's close with this excerpt from the Emergency Use Authorization granted by the FDA for Pfizer/BioNTech's Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine dated August 23, 2021:

 

Unfortunately, given that it will take up to the year 2027 before these studies are completed, the health of adolescent males is at significant risk from cardiac events after vaccination for COVID-19.  Fortunately,  governments, the medical community and parents of young males now have the safety signal data that they need to make a decision on the continued vaccination of young males; whether the powers that (ought not to) be use it wisely or choose to ignore it because it doesn't fit their narrative of a "needle in every arm" is up to them.

How the CDC Alters its Narrative to Align with the Facts

One of the keys to solving the pandemic has been the use of a brand new vaccine technology called messenger RNA better known to most of us as mRNA.  This technology works as follows according to the CDC:

 

Here's another collection of graphics from the European Vaccination Information Portal showing how the mRNA vaccines work:

 

Note this phrase from the second graphic:

 

"The proteins and the mRNA are destroyed and disappear from your body in a matter of days."

  

Here's another graphic from the New York City government with the same information:

 

This narrative has been promoted heavily during the vaccination phase of the pandemic, largely to reassure the COVID-19 vaccine consumers that the mRNA technology would not alter human DNA as shown here:

 

As the purveyor of health information to the American public and as one of the world's most influential medical institutions, narratives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or CDC carry a lot of weight globally.  Here's what the CDC had to say about the persistence of mRNA in the human body on July 22, 2022:

 

The next day, this is what the CDC had to say about the persistence of mRNA after vaccination:

 

 

Is the CDC now recanting on a key part of its COVID-19 mRNA vaccine safety claims that were being used to coerce humans into accepting the vaccines as "safe"?  

The CDC has now completely removed its guidance on the persistence of mRNA and the spike proteins generated by the COVID-19 vaccines which had been part of its narrative going back to November 2020 before the mRNA vaccines had even rolled out and were still being tested by their manufacturers as shown here:

 

Apparently, in the CDC's world, if facts don't align with the narrative, you simply change the "facts" on your website, hoping that the world doesn't notice.  George Orwell would be so delighted to see that his vision of the future has come true as quoted here:

 

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party (or CDC) is always right."