With Washington spending
a great deal of time on the immigration issue, I wanted to take a look back at
the issue in its historical context since President Obama appeared on the
scene. This is particularly pertinent given that at a news conference in
Australia on November 16th, 2014, the President made this comment in response
to a question about his changing stance on "going it alone" on
immigration reform, particularly the deportation of undocumented immigrants, by Jim
Avila of ABC News:
Jim Avila: "Following up on
immigration — in 2010, when asked by immigration reform advocates to stop
deportations and act alone on providing legal status for the undocumented, you
said, “I’m President, I’m not king. I can’t do these things just by myself.” In
2013, you said, “I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute
laws that are passed.” Mr. President, what has changed since then? And since
you’ve now had a chance to talk since July with your legal advisors, what do
you now believe are your limits so that you can continue to act as president
and not as emperor or king?"
President Obama: "Well, actually,
my position hasn’t changed. When I was talking to the advocates, their interest
was in me, through executive action, duplicating the legislation that was
stalled in Congress. And getting a comprehensive deal of the sort that is in
the Senate legislation, for example, does extend beyond my legal authorities.
There are certain things I cannot do. There are certain limits to what falls
within the realm of prosecutorial discretion in terms of how we apply existing
immigration laws."
I believe that Mr. Avila's question was very specific, asking the President
whether he believed that he had the authority to take the kinds of actions
that he is now undertaking and that, in the past, he had stated that, as the Chief Executive, his powers were legally limited.
What is rather interesting is this
Google Fireside Chat held back in February 2013, focusing on the
comments that the President made (starting at the 18 minute, 42 second mark)
where he is asked about the record number of immigrants deported by the Obama
Administration and what he would do to ensure that families weren't being
broken apart:
Here is is
response:
"Well,
look Jacky, this is something that I’ve struggled with throughout my
presidency. The problem is that, you know, I’m the president of the United
States. I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws
that are passed, and Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a
broken immigration system.
And what that means is that we have certain
obligations to enforce the laws that are in place, even if we think that in
many cases the results may be tragic. And what we have
been able to do is to make sure that we’re focusing our enforcement resources
on criminals, as opposed to somebody who’s here just trying to work and look
after their families.
What we
have tried to do is administratively reduce the burdens and hardships on
families being separated. And what we’ve done is, obviously, pass the
deferred action which made sure that the DREAMers, young people who were
brought here and think of themselves as Americans, are American except for
their papers, that they’re not deported.
Having said
all that, we’ve kind of stretched our administrative flexibility as much as we
can. And that’s why making sure we get comprehensive immigration reform done is
so important." (my bold)
Incidentally, here is a graph from Pew Research Centre
showing the number of deportations of both criminal and non-criminal immigrants
since 2001:
At 438,421 in fiscal 2013, the Obama
Administration has deported a record number of unauthorized immigrants. Between 2009 and 2013, the current Administration has
deported a total of 1.253 million immigrants; by way of comparison, in eight years, the
Bush II Administration deported 2.102 million immigrants.
In another town hall meeting held in March 2011, a question was asked
about granting Temporary Protective Status to students as shown here:
The President states that he cannot suspend deportations through the
use of an Executive Order because there are laws on the books that Congress has
passed and that the job of the Executive Branch is simply to enforce the laws
that Congress passes. He also states that the President cannot just ignore the
laws through the use of Executive Orders because those actions would be
inappropriate for his position as President.
In closing, let's take a quick look at a few comments made by the
President in the past about the powers available to the Executive:
1.) March 31, 2008: The Presidential
candidate states that he takes the Constitution very seriously and that the biggest
problem occurred when President Bush II acted on his own through the use of
executive powers, a process that the current President intended to reverse when
he became President.
2.) May 19, 2008: The Presidential candidate, when
asked if he will use executive powers to ignore Congress, responds by stating
that he will obey the Constitution and will not use signing statements but will
either veto or sign what Congress sends to him, as he should under the powers
granted to him by the Constitution. He states that his position is in
sharp contrast to what President Bush II's "end runs around Congress".
He also states that it is important to have a President that is not too
powerful and a Congress that is not too powerful.
As has become apparent, before taking his position behind the Oval Office desk, Barak
Obama was a bit naive about what could be accomplished by a sitting President.
The partisan fractiousness of Congress has definitely had a negative
impact on his agenda, however, looking through his past comments on immigration and the use of executive powers would, at the very least, lead us to believe that his stance has evolved,
contrary to what he's telling us.
"You will note that Mr. Avila's question was very specific, asking the President whether he believed that he had the authority to take the kinds of actions that he is now undertaking."
ReplyDeleteI read Avila's questions that you quoted carefully, several times. Your characterization of them is sloppy, at best.
I had hoped that I would clear up things by quoting President Obama's past statements on immigration and his role as Chief Executive. Apparently I failed!
ReplyDelete