Updated July 2015
In my last posting, I briefly touched on the subject of this posting, the issue of which sector of the American economy has the greatest investment in Washington politics. In this posting, I want to look at that sector in greater detail.
In my last posting, I briefly touched on the subject of this posting, the issue of which sector of the American economy has the greatest investment in Washington politics. In this posting, I want to look at that sector in greater detail.
Here, once again, is a chart showing the top
industries and donor groups in the 2014 cycle:
The securities and
investment sector (i.e. Wall Street and its offspring) have raised just over
$169 million and has donated $100.9 million to PACs, parties and candidates.
Other than the "retired" sector, Wall Street is, by a wide
margin, the biggest funder of political activities in Washington.
Historically, the
political influence of the securities and investment industry was led by
brokerage houses, bankers and stockbrokers, however, in the age of new investment
vehicles and Washington's penchant for regulation, both hedge funds and private
investment companies have a greater interest in trying to influence
Washington's policies as we will see.
Let's take a detailed
look at Wall Street's funding activities in Washington. Here is a chart showing the top contributors
for the 2013 - 2014 cycle and where those contributions ended up:
It becomes quite apparent
that the vast majority of what Wall Street contributes to the federal political
scene ends up in the hands of outside spending groups. The remainder is
divided between the Democrats and the Republicans with the Republicans
receiving 61.6 percent of the $100.87 million that is doled out and the
Democrats receiving a relatively paltry 38.4 percent. Here is a graph
showing how, since 2012, Wall Street has increasingly spent its money on the
Republican side of the ledger:
Prior to 2010, the
securities industry tended to spend most of its political "money
might" on the party that was in power. That changed with the 2010
passing of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by the
Democrats. You will also notice that, in the 2012 Presidential election, Wall Street had total contributions of $287.37 million, putting them in second place over all other sectors. Most of the funds raised came from individuals working in the securities industry, in fact, the $181.5 million raised by individuals in the securities industry far outweighed the $13.3 million that came from PACS. In the 2012 election cycle, the securities sector donated $134.2 million or 69 percent of their total donations to the Republicans and only $60.5 or 31 percent of their total donations went to Democrats. Contributions by the securities and investment sector during the 2012 election cycle was by far the largest in its history, well ahead of the $177.2 million that was contributed by the sector in the 2008 cycle.
Let's look at a bit of detail about the top three contributors. As you noticed in the chart above, Elliott Management is by far the largest contributor followed by Renaissance Technologies and TD Ameritrade. Elliott Management is a major hedge fund founded by Paul Singer in 1977, making it one of the oldest hedge funds. under continuous management. It is based in New York City and manages around $23 billion in assets. Renaissance Technologies is a Long-Island based hedge fund founded in 1982 by James Simons. It manages around $15 billion in assets. TD Ameritrade is an online broker based in Omaha. It is owned by Ameritrade Holding Corporation which, in turn, is owned by TD Bank Financial Group, a Toronto, Ontario based banking conglomerate. It is interesting to see a Canadian financial behemoth involved in political influence in the United States.
Here is a graphic showing the how the money
given to Congress was split in the 2014 cycle:
So far, the Democrats
have received $21.99 million compared to $30.63 million to the Republicans.
In the House, the Republicans received an average of $65,931 compared to
$50,814 to the Democrats. In the Senate, the Republicans received an
average of $148,679 compared to $152,530 for the Democrats.
Here is a list showing the top
twenty individual recipients of Wall Street's unfettered generosity in 2014:
Since hedge funds have
become such an important part of Wall Street, let's look at a chart showing how much hedge funds have
contributed to Washington's political scene in the 2014 cycle:
Over $40 million has been
contributed to candidates, parties and outside political groups by the hedge
fund subsector alone in the 2014 cycle. If we go back to the 2008 Presidential
election cycle, we find that only $11 million was contributed by hedge funds as
shown on this chart:
This shows us that hedge
funds, the investment vehicle of the most elite among us, are playing an
increasingly important role in influencing American politics.
To close, it is interesting to see
that Wall Street and its offspring are having a substantial monetary impact on the
federal political scene. With their growing political funding activities,
they are likely to have an increasing impact on policies that would result in
increasing regulations over their operations.
Where are the stats for union funding?
ReplyDelete^^Unions didn't cause the great recession/collapse we are still living through.
ReplyDeleteIt's really sad that money buys our government. (in most cases).. People are so controlled by TV adverts they are unable to use their brain. Pre-election news is filled with
ReplyDeleteX has raised $5 mil, but Y has $7.5 mil. What has money got to do with MY vote?