Given that it looks like
the 2016 Presidential race is starting to heat up, at least from the Republican perspective, I
thought that a brief look at the recent musings from a 2008 GOP candidate was
in order.
Let's open this posting
with a quote from Ms. Palin at CPAC 2013 when her teleprompter seemed to be
functioning:
While many of America's
politicians are reliant on teleprompters to keep them on message, a performance
by Sarah Palin at the recent Iowa Freedom Summit gives us a prime example of
how badly things can go wrong when a teleprompter fails:
In case you don't really care to listen to her entire speech, Ms. Palin's "free
association" really hits its stride around the 26 and 28 minute marks. This performance begs the
question "What would come out of the mouths of politicians if they weren't
supplied with an ample inventory of talking points?".
Here's what Palin-fan Byron York had to say
about the 2016 Presidential race and its "Palin problem" and her
performance at the Freedom Summit:
"First, Palin embarked on an extended
stream-of-consciousness complaint about media coverage of her decision to run in
a half-marathon race in Storm Lake, Iowa in 2011. She then moved on to
grumbling about coverage of a recent photo of her with a supporter who had made
a sign saying "Fuc_ you Michael Moore" in reaction to the left-wing
moviemaker's criticism of the film "American Sniper." Then it was on
to Palin's objections about the social media ruckus over a picture of her
six-year-old son Trig standing on the family's Labrador Retriever.
It was all
quite petty, and yet the complaining took half of Palin's allotted time. She
then proceeded to blow through her time limit with a free-association ramble on
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the energy industry, her daughter Bristol,
Margaret Thatcher, middle-class economics — "the man can only ride ya when
your back is bent" — women in politics, and much more. It would be hard to
say that Palin's 35-minute talk had a theme, but she did hint that she is
interested in running, although there are no indications she has taken any
actual steps in that direction.
"Long
and disjointed," said one social conservative activist when asked for
reaction. "A weird speech," said another conservative activist.
"Terrible. Didn't make any sense."
"There
was a certain coarseness to her that wasn't there before," said yet
another social conservative who noted that some in the crowd were uncomfortable
with Palin declarations like, "Screw the left in Hollywood!" (It's
not that they like the left in Hollywood — just the opposite — but the
crudeness of Palin's expressions turned them off.)
...By the time
Palin finished speaking, it was hard for anyone to believe she truly is
"seriously interested" in running for president."
Let's hope
that Mr. York is right and that we don't get a rerun of 2008.
"Long and disjointed" may be an understatement, thanks for letting us know we could jump to the 26 minute mark and not miss anything of great importance. It is a frightening reality that she could of moved all the way to the top. Just because someone reaches a position of power does not mean they are capable or intelligent.
ReplyDeleteBeing disorganized, inarticulate, dumb, and wacky are not really disabilities for a Republican, so Sarah could make it, yet. I hope she runs.
ReplyDeleteReady for the mental institution but are the persons already in the asylum ready for her? I don't think so!
ReplyDeleteYour Momma Dumb; your Daddy Dumb; you came out Dumb Dumb....
ReplyDelete