Demographia recently
released the 11th annual edition of its international housing affordability
survey. In this posting, I will be focusing on Demographia's analysis of
the Canadian real estate market, information that is particularly critical
given that valuations (and mortgage debt) in some of Canada's metropolitan markets have reached
stratospheric levels.
Demographia measures
housing affordability for 9 nations, including Australia, Canada, China (Hong
Kong), Ireland, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the
United States. Demographia uses a measure called the median multiple
which is defined as the median price of a home in a given market divided by the
median household income in that market or:
Median Multiple =
Median Price of a Home
Median Household Income
This gives us a good
sense of how affordable housing is an a particular market. Historically,
where the median multiple ranges between 2.0 and 3.0, housing in that market is
considered "affordable", that is, the mortgages required to buy
housing are quite easily serviced by home owners. However, as we all know, household
incomes have remained relatively stagnant in many Western nations over the past
two to three decades. Growth in housing prices has far outstripped growth
in household income, meaning that housing has become increasingly unaffordable
because mortgage payments rise as a percentage of household income. This
means that the median multiple is rising as housing prices rise and incomes
stagnate. Demographia uses the median multiple to further define housing
in unaffordable markets as such:
Now, let's compare
housing affordability for all markets, both larger and smaller, for all nine
nations in Demographia's analysis:
Of the 35 largest markets
in Canada, only 5 (14.3 percent) are considered affordable, 16 (45.7 percent)
are considered moderately unaffordable, 9 (25.7 percent) are considered
seriously unaffordable and 5 (14.3 percent) are considered severely
unaffordable. On average, Canada's 35 largest markets have a median multiple
of 3.9 or moderately unaffordable. This compares to 3.4 for the United
States, 5.0 for the United Kingdom, 5.2 for New Zealand and 5.5 for Australia.
Now, let's look at some
details. Here is a table showing Canada's ten most affordable real estate
markets showing how the median multiple has changed between 2013 - 2014 and the
year-over-year change in median price:
Here is a table showing
Canada's ten least affordable real estate markets:
It is interesting to see
that four of the ten least affordable real estate markets in Canada are located in British Columbia.
Here is a graph showing
how the median multiple for Vancouver has increased since 2004:
Here is a graph showing
how the median multiple for Toronto has increased since 2004:
Other than a very short-term levelling off in affordability during 2007 - 2008, in both cities, it has
become increasingly difficult for potential buyers to purchase a residence. Of all 378 markets in nine nations in the Demographia study, Vancouver had the second-least affordable real estate.
Now, let's switch
countries for a moment. Here is a graph showing what happened to the
median multiple in Los Angeles as it rose during the housing boom and collapsed
during the housing bust:
This shows us that even
when it looks like housing valuations can rise without end, a significant
correction can occur very quickly when real estate becomes far too expensive for households. In several of Canada's housing
markets, current median multiple levels are unsustainable over the long-term,
particularly if mortgage rates rise by even a modest amount.
No comments:
Post a Comment