While everyone focusses
on the Federal Reserve's upcoming interest rate timing decision, there is another significant
decision that the great minds at the Fed will have to make in 2016. This
decision could have a marked impact on interest rates that the Federal Reserve
will have little control over.
Let's start by looking at
the Federal Reserve's balance sheet which are
held in the Federal Reserve System Open Market Account (SOMA):
Right now, the Fed has
the largest inventory of U.S. Treasuries held by a single holder. As of
April 1, 2015, the $4.228 trillion in securities in the Fed's balance sheet is
made up of $2.459 trillion in U.S. Treasuries and $1.732 trillion in
mortgage-backed securities. The $2.459 trillion in U.S. Treasuries is
composed of $2.347 trillion in Treasury Notes and Bonds and $98.47 billion in
inflation indexed Treasury Notes and Bonds (TIPS). Note that more than
half of these Treasury securities (61.4 percent) are held by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York as shown on this table:
It is also interesting to
note that the Federal Reserve now owns 22.5 percent of the $10.947 trillion in
outstanding U.S. Treasury Notes, Bonds and TIPS according to SIFMA data.
Here is a table showing
the maturity distribution of the Fed's Treasury inventory:
Here's the conundrum.
Over the full year 2015, only $4.8 billion worth of U.S. Treasuries held
by the Federal Reserve will reach maturity. Things change dramatically in
2016 when approximately $216 billion of the Federal Reserve's holdings
of U.S. Treasuries mature. At this point, the Fed must make a decision;
do they allow the Treasuries to mature and reduce the size of its balance sheet
or do they reinvest the proceeds, keeping the size of its balance sheet at a
constant level? Obviously, the federal government will have to reissue
the Treasuries since the federal debt is not getting smaller. This means
that if the Fed decides not to reinvest the $216 billion, there will be more
Treasuries available for investors and, as supply rises, prices will decline
and yields will rise.
The Federal Open Market
Committee has given us a bit of a clue about what they plan to do about their bloated balance sheet in their
press release dated September 17, 2014:
"The Committee
intends to reduce the Federal Reserve's securities holdings in a gradual and
predictable manner primarily by ceasing to reinvest repayments of principal on
securities held in the SOMA.
The Committee expects to
cease or commence phasing out reinvestments after it begins increasing the
target range for the federal funds rate; the timing will depend on how economic
and financial conditions and the economic outlook evolve.
The Committee currently
does not anticipate selling agency mortgage-backed securities as part of the
normalization process, although limited sales might be warranted in the longer
run to reduce or eliminate residual holdings. The timing and pace of any sales
would be communicated to the public in advance.
The Committee intends
that the Federal Reserve will, in the longer run, hold no more securities than
necessary to implement monetary policy efficiently and effectively, and that it
will hold primarily Treasury securities, thereby minimizing the effect of
Federal Reserve holdings on the allocation of credit across sectors of the
economy." (my bold)
Right now, the
economy is extremely fragile. This means that the timing of the unwinding of the Federal Reserve's
massive balance sheet could be even more important than the timing of the first
and following interest rate increases. One misstep on the balance sheet unwinding, and the economy could
find itself under significant negative pressure.
In a recent article written by bond king Bill Gross titled "Going To the Dogs" Gross describes some of the current economic conditions we face. His thoughts strongly dovetail with my concerns as to how these low rates distort and cause massive misallocation of resources throughout the economy.
ReplyDeleteThe growth in sub-prime auto loans is a glaring confirmation of this and the main reason for surging sales in the auto sector. This effort to offset the dwindling buying power of the public sector by encouraging them to take on more debt by easing terms and artificially low interest rates will not end well. Below is an article that looks deeper into the flaws in this policy.
http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2015/03/low-interest-rates-and-unintended.html