While the media focuses
on the headline unemployment and newly unemployed statistics, it tends to forget about
Americans that have been excluded from collecting state unemployment benefits,
the only benefits that were available to unemployed workers after the federal
emergency unemployment benefits expired at the end of 2013. While the
number of Americans that have been put back to work because of an improving
economy since the end of the Great Recession is substantial, according to research by the Economic Policy Institute, a
record number of jobless workers are excluded from collecting the only source
of unemployment benefits that were available to them.
Let's look at a bit of
background information to start. In the United States, the
federally-funded, state-administered unemployment insurance scheme has provided
a worker who has lost his/her job unemployment benefits for up to 26 weeks.
In states that had sharply rising unemployment rates, an extended benefit
program provides an additional 13 to 20 weeks of unemployment insurance
benefits. In June 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Unemployment
Compensation program which provided a maximum of 63 weeks of additional
unemployment benefits. This program expired on December 2013, leaving workers dependent on state-level unemployment insurance benefits. While
the federal government funds unemployment programs, state governments regulate
the program's eligibility rules, benefit amounts and weeks of benefits
available with the goal of providing temporary income replacement, ensuring
that consumer spending is maintained during an economic contraction.
Unemployment benefits are paid by trust funds maintained for each state
held at the U.S. Treasury; these funds are financed with employer payroll taxes
for the most part. The system is designed so that states can increase the
balance of their unemployment trust funds during periods when the economy is
strong and there is low unemployment since, during periods of positive economic
growth, states pay less in UI benefits than they gather in revenues.
The total cost of UI
benefits to states are driven by three factors:
1.) the unemployment
rate.
2.) the share of prior
wages replaced by UI benefits.
3.) the benefit
recipiency rate.
The last factor, the
benefit recipiency rate, is a measure of the percentage of jobless workers that
actually get UI benefits. One of the important indicators that is used to
measure the success of state unemployment insurance programs is the proportion
of unemployed individuals in the state that receive UI benefits. In general,
a falling benefit recipiency rate is considered to be a hinderance to
unemployed workers since there is empirical evidence that UI benefits actually
improve the fit between a worker's skills and earnings experience and the
skills required and compensation provided by the new job.
Let's focus on how the
benefit recipiency rate varies from state-to-state. From the late 1960s
to 2011, all states paid regular UI benefits for at least 26 weeks.
During the period between 2001 and 2007, even though the economy was booming,
many states failed to adequately fund their unemployment trust funds, causing
severe problems when the Great Recession hit. As the level of state UI
payouts grew steadily during and after the Great Recession, some states cut UI
benefits with nine states abandoning the traditional 26 weeks of UI payments altogether.
These states included Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas,
Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina and South Carolina. Here is a table
showing the state-by-state changes:
Here is a graphic showing
the short-term UI recipiency rate for each state with the states that reduced
their benefits highlighted in red:
It is often assumed that
most unemployed workers get unemployment benefits. On average, in 2014,
the short-term UI recipiency rate across the United States was 34.7 percent,
meaning that 65.3 percent of short-term unemployed workers did not get state UI
benefits. Recipiency rates varied from a low of 14.8 percent in South
Carolina to a high of 65.7 percent in New Jersey with 21 states having 70 percent
or more of their short-term unemployed workers going without UI benefits.
Almost all of the nine states that cut their UI benefits saw faster than
average declines in UI recipiency rates; for example, South Carolina which cut
its UI duration from 26 weeks to 20 weeks saw its recipiency rate decline by a
substantial 12.9 percentage points.
Let's close with this
graph that shows the UI recipiency rate for the United States from 1977 to
2014:
It is very clear that
unemployment insurance recipiency rates are at historically low levels, in
fact, the level in 2014 was the lowest level in post-World War II history and
the current level of 23.1 percent is just above all time lows.
Unemployment insurance recipiency rates have remained at extremely low
levels since 2011 at the same time as the size of the potential labor force has
grown as new potential workers enter the workforce. With the two factors
working against each other, despite the headline 5.5 percent unemployment rate,
we can see that millions of unemployed American workers are suffering like they
have never suffered before.
That last line. It's obvious that everybody is trying their best to stay employed and channel finances to their family, what little they get anyway. But like you said, things are never just as it seems. We really need to find out more about the underlying problems so we can find more solutions!
ReplyDelete