While
you may or may not believe in the concept of anthropogenic global climate
change, a recent study by University of Washington's Adrian Raftery et al
entitled "Less than 2 degrees C warming by 2100 unlikely" should at
least give you pause to ponder the direction that our fragile world is heading.
This study is particularly pertinent given that a 2 degrees Celsius
temperature increase is often seen as the "tipping point" that could
lead to environmental calamity.
The
authors of the paper suggest that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) projections for global temperatures out to 2100 are not based on a fully
statistical approach. The authors use a country-specific model to predict
future greenhouse gas emissions based on each nations' population, per capita
GDP and carbon intensity (carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP). They
note that carbon intensity for many nations has already peaked as shown in this
graphic which expresses carbon dioxide emissions in tonnes of CO2 per
USD100,000 in Purchasing Power Parity:
Based
on 50 years of past data, the authors calculated the following parameters going
out to the year 2100:
1.)
Growth in per capita GDP - 1.8 percent annually with slower GDP growth in
developing economies
2.)
Decline in carbon intensity - 1.9 percent annually
3.)
Global population - increases by 4 billion, from the current 7.2 billion to
11.2 billion with much of the increase in the population of Sub-Saharan Africa
When
looking at the contribution of the three factors to uncertainty about carbon
dioxide emissions in 2100, the authors measured that GDP per capita accounted
for 50 percent of total uncertainty, carbon intensity accounted for 48 percent
of total uncertainty and global population accounted for only 2 percent of
total uncertainty.
With
this background in mind, here is a histogram showing the authors' predictive
distribution of global mean temperature changes relative to the period from
1861 to 1880 in degrees Celsius:
Calculations
show that, by 2100, there is a 90 percent chance that global temperatures will
increase by 2.0 to 4.9 degrees Celsius with a median of 3.2 degrees Celsius.
There is a 5 percent chance of warming by less than 2 degrees Celsius and
a 1 percent change of warming by less than 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Let's
close by looking at some quotes from the lead author, Adrian Raftery:
"Our
analysis shows that the goal of 2 degrees is very much a best-case scenario. It
is achievable, but only with major, sustained effort on all fronts over the
next 80 years. Our analysis is compatible with previous estimates,
but it finds that the most optimistic projections are unlikely to happen. We're
closer to the margin than we think. Overall, the goals expressed in
the Paris Agreement are ambitious but realistic. The bad news is
they are unlikely to be enough to achieve the target of keeping warming at or
below 1.5 degrees."
As we can see
from this study, one of the biggest impacts on long-term greenhouse gas
emissions is the change in carbon intensity. If continuing innovations
reduce global energy needs at the same time that economic output grows, we may
not win the 2 degree Celsius battle but we may prevent the worst case scenario
from occurring as is predicted in this rather sobering research.
Methane is factoring into global warming at rates that exceed projections, it also exacerbates the problem faster than carbon does.
ReplyDeleteIt also takes over 30yrs for the gasses to reach the upper atmosphere for full effect. No matter what we do now this lag time will really cost us. With all the fake news climate change deniers affecting sheeples thinking(it's just cycles), I'd say we are almost done as a species!
ReplyDelete