With the Trump Administration moving
towards conflict in at least one or two foreign theatres, a quick look at the
some of the biggest individual beneficiaries of war is in order, taking a
closer look at how much of the business of each of these five companies is
attributable to the spending of U.S. tax dollars and how much the named
executive officers at each company make, thanks to spending by the Pentagon.
Let's start by listing the five biggest defense contractors in the
United States along with their global position:
1.) Lockheed Martin (also 1st globally)
2.) Boeing (also 2nd globally)
3.) Raytheon (also 4th globally)
4.) General Dynamics (also 5th
globally)
5.) Northrop Grumman (also 6th
globally)
Let's look at their net earnings for
the most recent full fiscal year:
1.) Lockheed Martin - $5.302 billion (2016) up
from $3.605 billion in 2015
2.) Boeing - $4.895 billion (2016) down from
$5.176 billion in 2015
3.) Raytheon - $2.174 billion (2016) up from
$2.067 billion in 2015
4.) General
Dynamics - $2.995 billion (2016) down from $2.965 billion in 2015
5.) Northrop Grumman - $2.2 billion (2016) up
from $1.99 billion in 2015
Here is the percentage of sales for
each company that are made to the United States government:
1.) Lockheed Martin: 71 percent
2.) Boeing: 64 percent of Boeing's
sales in its Defense business
3.) Raytheon - 67 percent
4.) General Dynamics - 60 percent
5.) Northrop Grumman - 84 percent
Stock Performance: Here's a look
at how each company's stock has performed over the past five years, keeping in
mind that, in general, Named Executive Officers are among the largest
individual shareholders:
1.) Lockheed Martin:
2.) Boeing:
3.) Raytheon:
4.) General Dynamics:
5.) Northrop Grumman:
In all cases, over the past five years, the returns to shareholders by the top five defense companies have outstripped the growth in the S&P 500 by a relatively wide margin.
Here is the compensation for each
company's Named Executive Officers (NEOs):
1.) Lockheed Martin:
2.) Boeing:
3.) Raytheon:
4.) General Dynamics:
5.) Northrop Grumman:
No comments:
Post a Comment