The recent dump of early 1990s documents on the National Security Archives
website provides the world with an insider's glimpse at the
events of the period during which the former Soviet Union was collapsing. In February 1990, U.S. President George H. W. Bush and Soviet
President Mikhail Gorbachev and their respective representatives negotiated the
end of the Cold War and the all-important re-unification of the two Germanys. It was during this negotiation that the issue of
NATO was raised, an issue that was of great importance to the Soviet Union
since it was NATO that provided the military balance in the region that kept
the world's two greatest military powers from expanding into each other's
territory. The Soviet team was concerned that, once the Soviet Union completely
collapsed, NATO would expand into the former Warsaw Pact nations and threaten
the stability and existence of Russia. To put this into perspective, one
has to keep in mind that during the Second World War, Germany invaded Russia
through Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania and Ukraine as shown on this map:
This invasion ultimately resulted in the
deaths of at least 25 million Russians including 9.75 million
military personnel and threatened the very existence of the Soviet Union.
By way of comparison, in the Second World War, the United States lost
418,500 Americans including 416,800 military personnel.
Here is a map showing the extent of the former Soviet
Union and the Warsaw Pact in particular in 1955, showing how the Soviet Union
has protected its eastern flank:
Here is a map showing the members of the
Soviet Union in 1991:
Let's briefly look at NATO to put
everything into perspective. In 1949, NATO was founded by 12 member states; Belgium,
Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States. Other than the United
States and perhaps the United Kingdom, none of the 12 members would have been
considered a world power by the end of World War II. Greece and Turkey
joined NATO in 1952, Germany joined in 1955 and Spain joined in 1982. As
shown here, under Article 10 of the charter:
"The
Parties may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a
position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the
security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty. Any State so
invited may become a Party to the Treaty by depositing its instrument of
accession with the Government of the United States of America. The Government
of the United States of America will inform each of the Parties of the deposit
of each such instrument of accession."
Here is a map showing the current membership
in NATO:
The "new NATO" is now
comprised of 29 member states; the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined in
1999, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia
joined in 2004, Albania and Croatia joined in 2009 and Montenegro joined in
2017. Currently Bosnia and Herzegovina (formerly part of Yugoslavia),
Georgia and Macedonia (also formerly part of Yugoslavia) are potential
members.
With that background on the Soviet
Union and NATO, let's look through some of the key documents in the recent
release from the National Security Archives that show us how the United States
handled the issue of NATO's expansion into the former territories of the Soviet
Union. We will outline the key contents in several of the documents that
specifically discuss the expansion of NATO into the Warsaw Pact nations:
1.) Document 1 - U.S. Department of State Cable
dated February 1, 1990 - outlines a major policy address by Germany's Foreign
Minister Genscher which outlines his vision of a united Germany and its place
in the "new European architecture". A unified Germany
(including Berlin) will remain as a member of the European Community and a
member of the western alliance (i.e. NATO); he also states that the U.S. role
in ensuring security and stability in Europe is contingent on the continued
existence of NATO. Genscher notes that German unification must not lead
to an "impairment of Soviet security interests" and that "NATO
should rule out an expansion of its territory to the east, i.e. moving it closer
to the Soviet Borders.".
2.) Document 4 -
record of conversation between the U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and
Soviet Minister of Foreign Affairs Eduard Shevardnadze dated February 9, 1990 regarding
the unification of Germany. Here is a comment by James Baker:
Note the comment that "There
would, of course, have to be iron-clad guarantees that NATO's jurisdiction or
forces would not move eastward.". He also notes that one of the
biggest dangers of a neutral Germany is that it could become militaristic in
the future and that the only solution to security and stability is to ensure
that Germany remain in NATO and that United States troops remain within
Germany. He also notes the future threat of an aggressive nuclear
Germany.
3.) Document 5 - record of conversation between
the U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and Soviet President Gorbachev and
Minster of Foreign Affairs Eduard Shevardnadze dated February 9, 1990 regarding details
of German reunification. Here are the key comments from James Baker:
Again, note that the United States
clearly declared to the Soviet Union that NATO would not extend its forces
"one inch to the east". As well, once again, Mr. Baker notes
the dangers of a Germany with its own independent nuclear capability; he makes
it clear that he's rather that Germany and the rest of Europe depend on the
deterrent power of the United States.
4.) Document 8 - letter from U.S. Secretary of
State James Baker and Germany's Chancellor Helmut Kohl dated February 10, 1990
in which they discuss German unification and an update on Mr. Baker's meetings
in Moscow. Here is the key passage from the letter with "him" referring to Soviet President Gorbachev:
As you can see from these documents and
others that I have not included in this posting, in 1990 the leadership of the
former Soviet Union felt that they were supplied with ample assurance that NATO
would not expand eastward into the Warsaw Pact nations Whether the
United States deliberately misled the Soviet Union into believing that this was
not its intent all along is up for debate, however, the relative rapidity by
which the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined NATO suggests that the
American negotiators were quite likely hiding their true agenda. Given
Russia's experience during the Second World War, it is not terribly surprising
that the moves by NATO since 1990 are cause for great internal concern. After all, Russia's national consciousness includes the deaths of millions of its citizens over a relatively short 4 year period during the 1940s.
Thanks for another great article.
ReplyDeleteHey, the headline should have been "Lying to USSR".
ReplyDeleteOr, if you want a less pro-Russian point of view, read this:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2014/11/06/did-nato-promise-not-to-enlarge-gorbachev-says-no/
What would have been the morality of NATO refusing Poland, a country that lost more people as a proportion of its population than the USSR? Perhaps if the collapse of the Warsaw Pact had been foreseen, the USSR would have asked for and received actual written assurances as it did for so many other details.