We
are all quite aware that we are living in an ultra-low interest rate
environment thanks, in large part, to the creative efforts of the world's
central bankers. This environment was created in response to the near
collapse of the world's economy during the Great Recession and has been carried
forward into the third year of the so-called "recovery" as a
desperate means of stimulating a rather sick world economy back to health. Thus
far, the response of the world's economy to all of this cheap credit has been a
resounding and reverberating "Meh".
Just
so we can get a sense of how low interest rates really are compared to historic
norms, here is a graph showing the benchmark interest rate for the United States since 1972:
While
the central bankers of the so-called "developed nations" ponder why
the world's economy seems so unresponsive to all of their machinations, there may be
an explanation. While this particular posting pertains to details about the issue in one nation, the same cause-effect relationship applies to all nations that are currently experiencing near-zero interest rates.
UHY
Hacker Young, a United Kingdom-based accounting firm, has released a study showing that low interest rates are
responsible, in part, for damaging the economy. UHY estimates that the
combination of high inflation (a United Kingdom Retail Price Index (inflation
rate) of 3.5 percent) in combination with near-zero interest rates on savings
and current accounts has resulted a decline in the value of the nation's
savings. UHY estimates that U.K. savers are losing nearly £18 billion
per year as inflation erodes the value of their savings, even on higher interest savings
accounts and longer-term locked-in investments. While I realize that this data is specific to the United Kingdom, the same issue faces savers in Canada, the United States and other nations where interest rates are at or near historic lows.
The
Bank of England reveals that over £115 billion is currently deposited in U.K.
bank accounts that are yielding zero percent interest. To put this number into
perspective, these savings work out to just over 7.5 percent of the United
Kingdom's GDP for 2011. Since smaller investors experienced frightful capital
losses during the stock market collapse of 2008 - 2009, many retirees, in
particular, are cautious about seeking the higher returns that could be available by
investing in equities. Many would prefer to see their real net worth drop as
inflation slowly eats away at their nest egg rather than to suffer from the sudden
shock of a cliff-like decline in the stock market. Despite historically low
returns on savings, the United Kingdom household savings ratio was 7.7 percent in the fourth
quarter of 2011 and 7.4 percent for all of 2011, up from 7.2 percent in 2010.
With
no return on relatively risk-free savings, savers are much more likely to spend
less. Since much of the developed world's economies relies on consumer
spending for continued growth, cutbacks in household spending on all of those
wonderful toys and other non-essential items will be curtailed, ultimately
having an impact on economic growth around the world. This is a prime example of the law of unintended consequences; central bank actions may actually be hurting the economy rather than helping it.
Thanks to QE, banks around the developed world are getting
away with paying savers very little or nothing for their savings, generally
offering rates that are well below the rate of inflation. This means that
your savings today are worth less in the future as inflation quickly eats up
any investment income. On the upside for the ruling class, extremely low interest
rates mean that governments around the world can continue to spend far more
than what they are bringing in because the interest owing on their debt is not
punitive....at least, not yet.
This is 'financial repression' and is not new. That fixed income savers suffered in the past when governments ended up with too much debt is clear from the past. In an earlier age, the sovereign merely defaulted. In the 20th Century--and now again in the 21st Century--they engaged in keeping interest rates artificially low so that there was a negative real rate of return. As debt is mostly in nominal terms this is a write down in real terms. As you correctly point out, this is hurting many sections of society and, possibly, also hindering an economic recovery.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting hypothesis is doing the rounds that firms, who might be in a position to invest, are holding off because they are suspicious of the unnatural economic conditions. So -- as you rightly point out -- central banks acting to cut interest rates to near zero and engaging in QE might be part of the problem. And it is not as if we do not have a precedent of the perverse effects of financial repression in Japan, which has flatlined since its economic bust, nearly a generation ago!
Thanks for your input Paul. Interesting point about writing down nominal debt. I agree about Japan - they've had nearly a decade of QE and look where that has got their economy!
ReplyDelete