According
to the Ministry of National Defense of the People's Republic of China, China's
military air capabilities have taken a very significant turn with the Chengdu
J-20 fighter officially entering service as shownhere:
The J-20 is China's latest
multi-role stealth fighter, a fourth-generation medium- and long-range fighter which made its debut flight in 2011. It is a very significant addition to the People's
Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and sets itself apart as the most advanced
fighter in the Asia - Pacific region, giving China a significant advantage over
the Japanese, Indian and Korean air forces. While the jet is not
currently fully operational, it represents a direct threat to America's fifth
generation fighters such F-35, and is likely to be fully operational by 2019.
The J029 will provide the PLAAF with both offensive and defensive
capabilities, stepping beyond its current function as a territorial air force.
Hereis the J-20's debut at the Zhuhai
Airshow in late 2016:
According toChina Power, the
J-20 is likely equipped with stealth and highly integrated avionics technology
and capabilities including supersonic cruising speeds that meet the
international standards for a fifth generation aircraft.
Here is a table showing the five
generations of both international and Chinese fighter aircraft:
Here is a diagram from China Power
comparing the J-20, F-22 and Russia's T-50 PAK FA:
The J-20 is equipped with two
Russian AL-31 engines, however, it appears that China will update the higher
with Chinese made WS-15 engines which will give it the ability for sustained
supersonic travel. The single-seater, two engine J-20 is also equipped with a passive
detection system that will provide the pilot with 360 degree spherical coverage
around the aircraft and a chin-mounted search and track sensor. The J-20
is equipped with two bays that are designed to hold small air-to-air missiles
and a larger bay located on the underside of the fuselage that can hold a
variety of weaponry, including both short- and long-range missiles.
Cost estimate (flyaway costs) for
the J-20 range from $30 to $120 million compared to less than $100 million for
Russia's T50, $143 million for America's F-22 and between$94 and $122 million for the F-35 (current costs) which is well below the cost of the early F-35s produced by Lockheed Martin.
According toRAND, the
J-20's combination of forward stealth and extended range could hold United
States Navy surface assets at risk, a particular concern given the ongoing
issues involving the South China Sea. As well, other analysts feel that
the J-20's abilities as a long-range fighter make it well suited to penetrate
the air defences of other nations, allowing China to destroy high value
military infrastructure.
China is also developing an
additional stealth fighter; theShenyang
FC-31also known as the J-31,
a smaller multirole stealth fighter that could be commercially exported to
other nations. The J-31 is roughly the same size as the American F-35 and
has a range of 7755 miles and a top speed of Mach 1.8. Some analysts feel
that it will be well suited as an aircraft for China's new aircraft carrier.
Hereis a video showing a demonstration of
the J-3 in 2014:
China, which for so many years
lagged behind the rest of the world's superpowers when it came to development
of highly advanced materiel is proving itself to be a "player" in the
world of supersonic, stealth aircraft. The further development and
adoption of these aircraft by the People's Liberation Army Airforce will make
the nation less vulnerable to threats from the United States and India when it
comes to its stance on the South China Sea and other territorial boundary
disputes.
At the recent Sochi meeting between
Vladimir Putin and his senior Defense Ministry officials, officials from
Russia's defense industry as well as the heads of various ministries and
regions, Mr. Putin made a series of very interesting comments about Russia's readiness for
war following the Zapad-2017 military exercise that received relatively little
coverage in the mainstream Western media. While this lack of coverage is
not terribly surprising given the anti-all things Russian sentiment that has taken root in
the Western media since 2014, it is rather negligent given the importance of
the comments and the fact that the world seems to be heading into the Cold War
Part 2.
As background, between September 14 and
20, 2017, Russia conducted one of its largest military exercises since the end
of the Cold War. Zapad-2017 tested Russia's plans for a
full-scale conflict with NATO with the drills taking place along the border
between Belarus/Russia/Kalinigrad and the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania. Here is a map from the European Council on
Foreign Relations showing the locations of the exercises:
Prior to the exercises, some Western analysts postulated that
Zapad-2017 was a springboard for Russia to invade and occupy Lithuania, Poland
and or Ukraine.
According to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Zapad-2017 involved the following:
Here is
a video showing Vladimir Putin arriving at and observing the Zapad-2017 war
games:
With that background, let's start
with Mr. Putin's comment as released by the
Kremlin regarding the state of Russia's military defences made on November 20,
2017 at the opening of the tenth cycle of meetings on military matters with
senior officials of Russia's Defense Ministry and the nation's defense industry
held in Sochi:
"The development of a new State
Armament Programme is nearing completion. Its implementation will largely
determine the combat capability of the service arms and branches for the coming
decade and in the long run. We need to carefully check all our plans.
Our Army and Navy must possess the most
advanced weapons, military and special equipment, which take into account,
among other things, potential changes in the strategy and tactics of warfare in
the future and are on a par or, better yet, superior to their foreign
counterparts. If we want to be in front and win, we must be better.
The key indicators of the programme
should, above all, ensure guaranteed strategic deterrence and, in the event of
a potential external threat, its effective neutralisation.
Of course, the implementation of the
State Armament Programme will depend on capabilities of defence enterprises,
scientific and research centres. However, it is important not only to develop
in a timely manner advanced technology or weapon samples that meet the
requirements of the Defence Ministry, but also to be ready to launch them into
mass production without any delays or disruptions." (my bold)
Here are additional comments made by Mr. Putin on November 21,
2017 at the Sochi series of meetings in which he focuses on the fulfillment of
Russia's state defense order:
"As part of the fulfilled
tasks, the armed forces have received over 3,400 items of advanced and upgraded
hardware, including 16 combat vessels, 190 modern aircraft and helicopters, 800
tanks and armoured combat vehicles, 170 missile defence systems, and 1,950
multipurpose vehicles.
Defence industry experts have carried
out regular maintenance of the main arms and equipment right in the field.
In general, these measures allow
increasing the overall share of modern arms and equipment models at the armed
forces’ disposal up to 60 percent by the end of this year.
Let me note that many arms samples were
tested in action against terrorists in the Syrian Arab Republic. The tests in
actual combat conditions confirmed the high quality of the Russian weapons.
Their traditional advantages are simple operation and reliability.
A number of our international partners,
including the new ones, have already shown interest in buying Russian arms and
equipment and expanding military technical cooperation with Russia.
We have to closely study and use the
practical experience of putting our armament systems to use. We also have to
encourage positive tendencies in planning, placing and fulfilling the state
defence order to make all elements of this interconnected system work
effectively together." (my bold)
Now, lets look at Mr. Putin's final comments regarding the Zapad-2017 war games to his colleagues at the Sochi
meetings on November 22, 2017:
"I propose that we discuss a key
event on our training schedule, the Zapad-2017 strategic military exercise,
primarily its civilian aspects as the exercise involved many civilian
departments and regions.
Attending this meeting are the heads of
ministries and the governors who contributed to the organisation of this
exercise. I would like them to speak about their conclusions and proposals
regarding the issues that occurred and the aspects that still need to be
addressed.
It should be said that several
important goals have been attained at the exercise. First, we checked our
mobilisation readiness and ability to use local resources to meet the troops’
requirements. Reservists were called up for this exercise, and we also tested
the ability of civilian companies to transfer their vehicles and equipment to
the armed forces and provide technical protection to transport communications.
We also assessed the provision of
transport and logistics services, as well as foods and medicines to the army.
We need to review once again the defence companies’ ability to quickly increase
output.
The exercise has exposed certain
shortcomings. We must analyse them so as to propose additional measures to
enhance mobilisation readiness.
I want to say that the economic ability
to increase the production of defence products and services quickly is a vital
element of military security. All strategic and simply large companies,
regardless of the type of ownership, must be able to do this.
We held detailed discussions on this
topic in 2015 and 2016. Instructions were issued to modernise production, to
create a reserve of material and technical resources, and to ensure the
transportation of military personnel. The ministries and agencies are working
on this in close cooperation with the Defence Ministry under the guidance of
the Board of the Military Industrial Commission. I would like you to make short
reports on this work at our meeting today and to say which shortcomings of the
past few years have been settled and which are still to be dealt with.
Let us talk about all of this in detail
and draw conclusions for the future." (my bold)
To put all of this into perspective,
Russia is the world's third largest spender when it comes to its military.
According to SIPRI, in 2016, the United States spent $611.12
billion (in 2015 U.S. dollars) on defense, China spent $215.18 billion and the
Russian Federation spent $69.25 billion. While Russia spends roughly
one-ninth of what the United States spends on its military, it has the
capability to produce materiel that should cause the United States to think
twice before escalating tensions to the point of outright hostilities. As
we can see from Mr. Putin's comments, the Russian Federation is "in it to
win it" in the event of an all-out war and is certainly preparing for this eventuality by modernizing its forces and preparing its civilian industries to convert to a war production footing. On the upside, the military-industrial-intelligence complex in America will be very happy!
I have been an avid follower of the world's political and economic scene since the great gold rush of 1979 - 1980 when it seemed that the world's economic system was on the verge of collapse. I am most concerned about the mounting level of government debt and the lack of political will to solve the problem. Actions need to be taken sooner rather than later when demographic issues will make solutions far more difficult. As a geoscientist, I am also concerned about the world's energy future; as we reach peak cheap oil, we need to find viable long-term solutions to what will ultimately become a supply-demand imbalance.