The two year civil war in Syria is
having an impact on its citizens that goes well beyond the physical. A
study by the Syria Needs Analysis Project (SNAP) looks at the economic impact
of the crisis and which sectors have been hardest hit.
Syria's economy is largely based on
agriculture, oil, trade, industry and tourism. As fighting spread
throughout the country, Syria's economic infrastructure was damaged or
destroyed and this has impeded economic growth. As well, sanctions imposed
by the EU, the United States and the Arab League have taken their toll on the
nation's imports and exports.
Here is a map that shows the impact
on the key sectors of the economy:
Let's look at the problems facing
Syria's economy for two key sectors; agriculture and industry:
1.) Agriculture: this sector
contributed 22 to 24 percent of Syria's GDP prior to the war with agricultural
exports constituting 16 to 22 percent of all exports in 2010with 80 percent of
the rural population practising farming. The five major crops include
grains, cotton, vegetables, permanent crops including olives and fruit and
fodder crops including barley. Before the civil war, 65 percent of all
cereal crops relied on irrigation. A prolonged drought between 2006 and
2010 was costly to this sector of Syria's economy, destroying the livelihoods
of 800,000 farmers and herders. Here is how agricultural output has been
impacted:
Wheat - output is 40 percent below
the 2000 to 2010 average.
Vegetables, fruit and olives -
output of vegetables has dropped by 60 percent in Homs and olive output is down
40 percent in Dar'a.
Cattle - production is down 25
percent compared to 2011.
Sheep - production is down 35
percent compared to 2011.
Poultry - production is down between
35 and 100 percent compared to 2011 with the closure of major chicken
operations in many areas and the sanctions preventing the import of mother
hens.
Farmers face a shortage of
fertilizers with prices increasing by 200 to 300 percent between January 2010
and June 2011. There is also a lack of a farming labour force as a result
of the exodus of civilians from areas of conflict. This has pushed up
labour wages from between 30 to 300 percent, depending on the area of the
country. Sanctions have had an impact on the availability of parts for
agricultural equipment, agricultural inputs like herbicides and pesticides and
diesel fuel.
2.) Industry: Syria's industrial
sector includes mining, manufacturing, construction and petroleum and includes
the manufacturing of beverages, textiles, petroleum products, tobacco, cement,
food goods, phosphate mining, oil seed crushing and automotive manufacturing.
The industrial infrastructure of the country has suffered severe damage
and there is a lack of both electricity and input materials. One city in
Aleppo, Sheikh Najjar, has seen its industrial output drop to 20 percent of
pre-war capacity. The Center for Policy Research estimates that the
unemployment rate increased to 50 percent in March 2013 which has resulted in
many Syrians seeking new sources of income as shown on this bar graph:
Estimates suggest that informal
economic activities (i.e. non-taxed employment including hashish sales, arms
trading and smuggling) were undertaken by 80 percent of Syria's workforce by
the end of 2012. As well, the number of cases of extreme poverty in the
nation are estimated to have increased from 2.2 million in 2010 to 3.7 million
in 2012 when modelling based on the nation's dropping GDP is used.
Damage to Syria's infrastructure has
been widespread with damage to the nation's electrical, water, oil, education
and agriculture infrastructure. It is estimated that capital losses are
now in excess of $42 billion. Ten percent of houses have been completely
damaged and 25 percent have been both partially and completely damaged.
Not unexpectedly, the conflict has had a major impact
on Syria's GDP. In 2010, Syria's GDP was $59 billion with an economic growth rate of between four and five percent; nominal GDP dropped to between $21 and $35 billion by June 2013, a
decline of between 41 and 64 percent. Around 28 percent of the total GDP
loss in 2011 and 2012 was due to international economic sanctions with the
majority of the loss ($3.9 billion of the $6.8 billion decline) due to sanctions on the
oil industry.
Needless to say, all of this
dropping economic activity has had a major impact on Syria's government
budgets. Syria's fiscal deficit has risen as follows:
2009 - $122 billion Syrian Pounds
2010 - $216 billion Syrian Pounds
2011 - $745 billion Syrian Pounds
In large part, the problem exists
because of Syria's reliance on oil revenues which amounted to 150 billion Syria
Pounds in 2010 but fell as a result of sanctions. Oil production was
4310,000 BOPD in 2006 but is estimate to have dropped to as little as 20,000 BOPD, a drop of 95 percent, as oil
fields fell into the hands of rebel forces. The budget deficit rose
from 3.8% in 2010 to 10.1% in 2012. Total public debt rose from 23% of GDP in 2010 to 40% of GDP in 2012 as shown here:
In order to keep
government expenditures at pre-crisis levels, the Syrian government has turned
on the money printing presses, increasing the money supply which has resulted
in a 50 percent plus devaluation in the Syrian Pound. This has pushed the
cost of most goods and services up by up to 300 percent.
We can clearly see
that the war and the use of sanctions has had a significant impact on Syria's
key economic sectors, its government debt and deficits and the growth of its
GDP. Unfortunately, as you can see, rather than pushing the Assad regime
to its knees, the sanctions have had a massive and very negative impact on the
very people of Syria that they were intended to help. From what we can
see, it will be years and require tens of billions of dollars of aid before
Syria's economy recovers to its pre-crisis state.
Thanks for shedding some light on the hidden cost of war. Currently I find myself weighing in on the side of doing more, not because it is our responsibility but because it may be in our best interest. I think we should do more but that does not mean we should jump in with both feet. It seems to be a case of you are damned if you do and damned if you don't, but this does not mean you should not try to do the best thing or the right thing. For more on this subject see the post below,
ReplyDeletehttp://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2013/05/syria-going-forward.html
War can really bring a lot of disadvantages to a nation's economy.
ReplyDelete