With the Federal government in
shutdown mode and hundreds of thousands of federal government workers on
temporary furlough, I thought that it would be an interesting exercise to look
at the number of Federal government employees and how the level has changed
over the past decade. Here is a graph from FRED showing
just that:
Ten years ago, there were 2.742
million federal government employees, excluding uniformed members of the
military. At the beginning of the latest recession in December 2007,
there were 2.756 million federal employees, the level being basically unchanged
over the four years leading up to the Great Recession. By the end of the
recession in June 2009, federal government employment had risen to 2.815
million and hit a peak of 3.415 million for a single month in May 2010.
Between September 2010 and October 2012, the number of federal employees
remained in a range of between 2.8 and 2.9 million then began its gradual drop
to its current level of 2.739 million. At its current level, federal
government jobs comprise about 2.4 percent of the total workforce, down very
slightly from 2.5 percent a decade ago. It is interesting to see that
while the rest of the economy saw a significant retrenchment in total private
non-farm employment during the Great Recession as shown here:
The number of total non-farm,
private sector employees is still 1.68 million or 1.45 percent below its pre-Great Recession
peak, having dropped from a peak of 115.66 million in December 2007 to its
nadir of 106.9 million in January 2010, a fall of 7.6 percent. In
contrast, over the same time frame, the number of federal government workers
was at a level that was higher than its pre-recession level for the entire five
year period from the beginning of 2008 to the end of 2012.
Here's a graphic showing how federal
government employees were divided by government branch and department in 2010,
including part-time and part-year workers:
Here is a chart comparing education
levels for the federal government employees and private sector employees:
A hefty portion of private sector
workers (41 percent) have high school or equivalent education compared to only
20 percent of workers in the federal government.
How does wage compensation level for
an average full-time, private sector worker compare to an average full-time
federal government employee? Here's the answer in 2010 dollars from a
January 2012 study released by the Congressional Budget Office:
Private sector workers with a high
school diploma or less are earning 21 percent less than equivalent workers in
the federal government. Even private sector workers with a Bachelor's
Degree are seeing a 2 percent penalty compared to their federal counterparts. The
biggest gains in the private sector over the federal government are not seen
until one has a Professional Degree or PhD; for these individuals who are
working in the private sector, there is a 23 percent wage premium over their
federal government counterparts.
I found this part particularly
interesting. Here is a comparison of private and federal government
benefits by level of educational attainment:
On average, over all educational
levels, the benefits paid to federal employees are 48 percent higher than those
found in the private sector. For those private sector workers with some
college or a high school diploma, there is a 71 and 72 percent negative
difference in the value of their benefits compared to their federal government
counterparts. It is largely the value of federal pension and health care
benefits that attracts workers who plan to stay with the federal government for
most of their working career, unlike the private sector where both benefits have historically been optional.
Now, let's total the wage and
benefit compensation for both sectors and divide it into groups based on educational attainment:
As expected, the private sector
loses out again, particularly if a worker has achieved an educational level of
some college or less. In those two cases, there is a 32 and 36 percent
negative difference in the total value of their compensation.
In graphical form, here's what total
average compensation for both private and federal government workers looks
like:
In fiscal 2011, the government spent
approximately $200 billion to compensate federal employees; a total of about
$80 billion to compensate civilian personnel working for the Department of
Defense and about $120 billion for non-defense personnel working in all other
departments.
It is interesting to put the amount
spent on federal employee compensation into context in the grand scheme of
federal spending and then compare average compensation levels in the federal
government to those found in the private sector. It will be fascinating
to see how long it takes before someone proposes either a significant cut in
staffing levels or a realignment in compensation to bring it more in line with
the private sector, particularly if the Senate and Congress are looking to reduce spending (if indeed that EVER happens).
As an aside, today when I
tried to get data on United States federal government payroll, I got this:
...and this:
The biggest reason for the difference in pay based on education is that lacking college is not a barrier to move up in the federal workforce. Hard work and preforming well can see someone with only a HS diploma end up as the chief of a department. This does not happen in the private sector. So while looking at the surface you are see things that don't make sence, there are countless differences between private and public work. But the biggest is that once you’re in, you’re in and it is up to you on where you go and how far you can advance, due to good old fashion hard work.
ReplyDeleteWhat fact based evidence do you have to back that up?
Delete